Skip to main content

Full text of "The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU"

See other formats

Paul Anthony Taylor, Aleksandra Niedzwiecki, 
Matthias Rath and August Kowalczyk 

Paul Anthony Taylor, Aleksandra Niedzwiecki, 
Matthias Rath and August Kowalczyk 


Dr. Rath Health Foundation 

What you always wanted to know 
about 'Brussels EU' 

But no one dared to tell you! 

Those who cannot remember the past 
are condemned to repeat it. 

Georg Santayana 

2010 Dr. Rath Health Foundation 


Foreword by August Kowalczyk 5 

Introduction 9 

Chapter 1 13 

Summarizing the evidence 

Chapter 2 77 

Walter Hallstein: Prominent Nazi Lawyer - 
And Key Architect of the 'Brussels EU' 

Chapter 3 161 

The "Greater Sphere Cartel" and its 
organisational framework 

Chapter 4 171 

The 'Brussels EU' Today: What the Oil and 
Drug Cartel and its political stakeholders 
don't want you to know 

Chapter 5 203 

The Rule of the Brussels EU would 

End Centuries of Freedom and Independence 

in Great Britain 

Chapter 6 217 

Relay Of Life 

Chapter 7 259 

Who's Who in the "Brussels EU" 


by August Kowalczyk 

We can find friendship in different ways. 

Happy is he who finds friendship with TRUTH. 

Happy, because above Faith, Hope and Love there is the value of 
RIGHTEOUSNESS - which is TRUTH. It often appears amidst the 
rubble of our naivety and ignorance - but it becomes a driving force 
of our mew' thinking and a necessity for action. 

And then, in the universe of humanity, there appears someone or 
those who know. 

In fact, they either know or they only pretend to know. If our lives 
and our universe are filled with history, inscribed into our lives, into 
our existence, then there is a chance that we can quickly recognize 
those who merely talk. 

For once, we can recognize the voices heard some time ago, the 
voices of those who already deceived the TRUTH. Lied, cheated, 
interpreted. Sometimes these are the voices of those who have been 
killing, sometimes those who have been giving the orders - to kill! 
And after successful disguise they are raising their fingers towards 
heaven and shout "do not kill." 


August Kowalczyk 
KZ Auschwitz 
Prisoner No. 6804 

And sometimes, from behind the 
drapes displaying the inscription of 
the CEEuropean Commission 1 , 
emerge faces which I know person- 
ally but not by their last or first 

This is the bench of those accused 
and sentenced in the Nuremberg 
Tribunal, these are the directors, 
legal advisors and engineers from 
the construction site of Oswiecim - 
the chemical plant IG Farben 

They all saw death and the agony of 
those who were dying but they 
turned their eye away towards a dis- 
tant horizon. 

They heard piercing screams of the bandit supervisors, their curses 
and thuds of beating, quite often deadly; strangely, however, they 
were deaf to the calls for help or for mercy. 

Quietly they were monitoring their corporate results and guarding 
profits. Their only concern was the underperformance of this evil 

On June 14, 2003 -the day of the 63rd anniversary of the first trans- 
port of Poles tattooed with the numbers from 31 to 728 to KL 
Auschwitz - in The Hague, the capital of Holland, I heard the words 
simple and deeply enlightening because of their simplicity and his- 
toric reality. 

These words were spoken by Dr. Matthias Rath, the President of the 
Health Foundation. This Hague meeting gathered people from 

around the world who came in 
order to testify to the words ex- 
pressed by him. This meeting 
ended with a complaint to the In- 
ternational Criminal Court in The 

This complaint, as any other com- 
plaint, contained many arguments, 
but it also taught. And then it ap- 
peared that the curtains hiding the 
TRUTH had fallen; or perhaps, not 
fallen yet, but just opened reveal- 
ing the facts about money, cartels, 
the pharmaceutical industry, and 
about my personal debtor the IG 
Farben Cartel. 

Until today, I have not received the 
compensation I am entitled to for 
my slave labor which I conducted 
from April 1 941 to May 1 942 at the 
construction site of IG Farben 

The structures, which almost al- 
ways are the opposite of freedom, 
took again the side of an execu- 
tioner not a victim. 

I supported the complaint to the In- 
ternational Tribunal in the Hague 
with my signature - August Kowal- 
czyk, former prisoner of the Ger- 
man Nazi concentration and 
extermination camp Auschwitz, 
my number 6804. 

IG Auschwitz was a 1 00% sub- 
sidiary of the IG Farben Cartel 
was the largest industrial plant 
in WWII Europe and was built 
to produce synthetic gasoline 
and rubber for the Wehr- 
macht's conquest of the Eura- 
sian continent on behalf of this 
Oil and Drug Cartel. 

This 24 square kilometer indus- 
trial complex was built with 
slave laborers of the Auschwitz 
concentration camp. August 
Kowalczyk was one of them. 
He is an eye witness of a Eu- 
rope under the brutal rule of 
the Cartel - and a 'guardian of 


From 2003 on, our common actions have led to the program 'Eu- 
rope for the People and by the People' which forms the basis for 
the 'People's Project for a European Constitution.' 

This book is a description of how TRUTH - its reality, its under- 
standing and above all its knowledge and trust- are searching each 

And how from personal experiences even those most subjective 
experiences and through a 'relay of remembrance and health', we 
can reach social openness and undertake political efforts to aban- 
don rhetoric mostly election rhetoric and as such unbinding in the 
name of TRUTH. 

And only then we can become friends with TRUTH. 

August Kowalczyk 

August Kowakczyk summarized his Auschwitz experiences in the 
book 'A Barbed Wire Refrain'. 

Further information: GB1AK479 




This book tells a story that many readers may, for obvious reasons, 
initially reject. In doing so, they may say that if the far-reaching his- 
torical information documented here were true, they would surely 
have heard about it before. 

Mindful of this, we, as the authors, consider it our responsibility to 
encourage our readers not only to read this book, but also to visit 
and study the source documents noted at the bottom of its pages. 

For almost three-quarters of a century, the world has been told that 
WWII was caused by a psychopath, Adolf Hitler, and his entourage 
of racist hooligans, the Nazis. The facts are, however, that WWII 
was a conquest war conducted on behalf of the Chemical, Oil and 
Drug Cartel with the goal of controlling the multi-trillion dollar 
global markets in the newly-emerging fields of patented chemical 

Official documents from the U.S. Congress and the Nuremberg war 
crimes tribunals unequivocally show that WWII was not only pre- 
pared, but also logistically and technically facilitated by the largest 
and most notorious oil and drug cartel at that time, namely, the Ger- 
man IG Farben cartel, composed of Bayer, BASF, Hoechst and other 
chemical companies. The summary of the indictment from Nurem- 
berg proves that without IG Farben, WWII could not have taken 

You will also learn in this book that WWI, the second largest tragedy 
of the twentieth century, was actually the first attempt at world con- 
quest by these corporate interests. Moreover, after both these mili- 
tary attempts to subjugate Europe and the world had failed, the Oil 
and Drug Cartel invested in a third attempt: the economic and po- 
litical conquest of Europe by means of the 'Brussels EU'. 

Not surprisingly, therefore, the key architects for the Brussels EU 
were recruited from among those technocrats who had already de- 


signed the plans for a post-WWII Europe under the control of the 
Nazi/Cartel coalition. This book will introduce you to these stake- 
holders of the cartel - dressed not in military uniforms, but in grey 
suits - the most notorious of whom was Walter Hallstein, the first 
president of the so-called EU Commission. 

The answer to the question as to why you have probably not heard 
about these ground-shaking facts before is straightforward. After 
1945, the Cartel invested hundreds of billions of dollars with one 
goal only: to rewrite history and cover its criminal past. This cover- 
up, with regard to the corporate origins of two World Wars, was 
obviously the precondition for the Cartel's third attempt - this time 
via the Brussels EU - at the conquest and control of Europe. 

Evidently, the Cartel interests had hoped to cement their control 
over Europe via the Brussels EU without these dark roots ever being 
exposed. However, this plan has failed. The publication of this book 
and the tens of thousands of authentic documents it references 
mean that the Brussels EU experiment is over. No democratic per- 
son, organization or party can possibly now support this third at- 
tempt at the conquest of Europe. 

This book is also a unique opportunity for all those politicians and 
political parties who have been lured into supporting the Brussels 
EU without knowing its background or understanding its true pur- 
pose. This includes the 27 heads of state who have signed the 'Lis- 
bon Treaty', the majority of whom did not understand that their 
signatures constituted an 'Enabling Act' for the Cartel and its stake- 
holders to seize control over Europe. These politicians and political 
parties now have the chance to make a complete turnaround and 
to publically revoke their support for a model of Europe that has 
been built upon decades of lies and deception. 

For citizens of the UK, the exposure of the historical roots of the 
Brussels EU is a particular provocation. Having twice previously - 
in WWI and WWII - played a critical role in saving Europe from 
takeover by the Cartel and its political stakeholders, they are now 


faced with the possibility that the great human sacrifices of their 
countrymen were in vain. With their subjugation under the Lisbon 
Treaty and the Brussels EU, the lives of sixty million Britons living 
today, and countless more as yet unborn, would come under the 
yoke of the very same interests that have tried to conquer and seize 
control of the UK twice before. 

We therefore encourage you, the reader of this book, to help dis- 
seminate this important information among your family, friends, 
work colleagues and in your community. Moreover, we encourage 
you to confront your political representatives - at the local, re- 
gional, national and European level - with the information con- 
tained in this book. In doing so, you must urge these politicians to 
make a choice: Either they can close their eyes to the truth and, 
thereby, recklessly support the takeover of Europe by a dictatorship 
of corporate interests, or they can act to protect democracy and the 
health and life interests of millions of people. The choice these 
politicians make with regard to their position on the Brussels EU 
will be the most important decision of their political careers. 

After the last attempt of the Cartel to control Europe had failed in 
1945, one of the most widely used excuses by its political stake- 
holders was that they "didn't know". After the publication of this 
book, however, no politician today can make such a claim in de- 
fense of his or her continued support for the 'Brussels EU'. 

From a historic perspective, what is most urgently needed now is a 
movement of the people. This is particularly important because 
politicians in many countries across Europe have become influ- 
enced by the corporate interests of the Oil and Drug Cartel; thus, 
they are no longer independent defenders of the interests of the 
people. A movement of the people will therefore be the only guar- 
antor of freedom, democracy and independence for the people of 
both Britain and Europe. 


The 'Lisbon Enabling Act' - 

Platform for the Oil and Drug Cartel's attempt 

at the Takeover of Europe 




Chapter 1 

the evidence 


Chapter 1 

Democracy Turns into Dictatorship 

How the European Union is controlled by corporate interests 

The Brussels EU is portraying itself to the world as a shining exam- 
ple of a 21 st century democracy. In reality, however, nothing could 
be further from the truth. 

In a true democracy, all power resides with the people. The princi- 
ple of 'separation of powers" between the three levels of govern- 
ment - Executive, Legislative and Judicial - establishes checks and 
balances to protect against abuse. This principle has been univer- 
sally accepted after mankind fought for it for thousands of years. 


In a true Democracy all the power resides with the people. 

The People 


Summarizing the evidence 

In contrast, the Brussels EU lacks this fundamental principle of 'sep- 
aration of powers. v Moreover, the people of Europe have neither 
control over the Executive level nor over the Legislative process. 
Worse, the parliament they elect has no means of effectively con- 
trolling these branches either. 

To hide this impotence, Article 225 - the so-called Tig Leaf Article" 

- was inserted into the 'Lisbon Treaty." This clause offers a possibility 
for the EU Parliament to "request the Commission to submit a pro- 
posal" for legislation. The Commission, of course, can simply refuse 
to do so. (See: 

Operating outside the basic principles of democracy, the Brussels EU 

- by definition - is a dictatorship. The power of the people to deter- 
mine their government has been transfered to corporate interests. 


Corporate interests 

• Oil and Drug Cartel 

the Executive 

Executive and 
Legislative Level 

• EU Commission 

• Appointed President 





If the ultimate power 
no longer resides with 
the people, democracy 
becomes dictatorship. 

EU Parliament 

• No right 
for independent 

s / The People 

Unlike in a true democracy, in the EU 
the power no longer resides with the people 


Further information: GB1BD122 


Chapter 1 

How the Oil and Drug Cartel 
Attempts to Control Europe 

The Brussels EU portrays itself to the world as a parliamentary democ- 
racy with the EU Parliament playing the decisive role. However, the 
executive decisions and the drafting of all legislation is carried out 
by the EU Commission and its staff of over 54,000 people. 

From their offices in the Commission headquarters -the Berlaymont 
building - and other locations, this paid army of career bureaucrats 
craft the laws of Europe on behalf of corporate interests. 

In contrast, the 754-member EU Parliament is composed of politi- 
cians from 27 nations who have no controlling power over this 
army of bureaucrats. The EU Parliament functions as little more than 
window-dressing for the purpose of portraying the Brussels EU as a 
'parliamentary democracy' to the people of Europe. 


Summarizing the evidence 





EU Bureaucracy: 

Over 42,000 unelected 
bureaucrats and other 
staff employed directly 

Over 1 2,000 "off the 
balance sheet" staff. 

A total of over 
54,000 people! 


The EU Commission 
and its giant bureau- 
cracy are both the ex- 
ecutive and decisive 
legislative body of the 
Brussels EU. 

In the European Uni- 
on, no law can be writ- 
ten or passed without 
the approval of the EU 
Commission, which is 
appointed on behalf of 

EU Parliament: 

The elected mem- 
bers of the EU Par- 
liament have no 
right for independ- 
ent law making! 

All 500 Million People of Europe 

Further information: GB1CE843 


Chapter 1 

The Stakeholders of the Oil and Drug Cartel 

On the previous pages we emphasised the fact that the power de- 
termining the government of Europe has shifted from the people to 
the corporate interests, namely the oil and dug cartel. This cartel is 
well characterised. It comprises the multi-trillion dollar chemical, 
petrochemical and pharmaceutical investment interests. This cartel 
is by far the largest corporate investment group in the world. 

During the 20 th century, this cartel has become not only the domi- 
nating economic force but has also positioned its political stake- 
holders in the governments of the leading industrial nations of the 
world. Leading representatives from the financial circles controlling 
this cartel are: 

• The Rockefeller group, respresenting the U.S. -based oil and drug 
interests. This is the largest of these financial interest groups. Built 
from the 1 9th century monopoly of the Standard Oil corporation, 
it now controls dozens of chemical, pharmaceutical and oil 
multinationals around the globe. One of its most prominent am- 
bassadors in recent decades has been Henry Kissinger. 

• Germany and France, the leading export nations of chemical and 
pharmaceutical products in Europe. This group had its roots in 
the late 19th century and comprised Bayer, BASF, Hoechst and 
later their infamous IG Farben cartel. Their modern-day successor 
companies are the leading investment businesses in Europe today 
and have been instrumental in building up the Brussels EU. 

As was widely covered in the media at the time, just days before 
his appointment, current EU President Rompuy was invited for his 
presidential "job interview" by the Bilderberg group - an elite circle 
of U.S./European corporate interests under the control of David 
Rockefeller and chaired by the ex-EU Commissioner and drug lob- 
byist Etienne Davignon. 


Summarizing the evidence 

And How They Chose the President of Europe 


• World's leading 
exporter of 

• One of the leading 
drug exporters 


• One of the leading 
drug exporters 
One of world's 
leading oil traders 

Rockefeller Group: 

• World's largest 
investment group 

• Core investments: 
Chemicals, oil, 

'Bilderberg Group' 

November 19 th , 2009: 
EU President Rompuy poses 
for the cameras with one of 
the men who brought him 
to power. 


cal stakeholders of 
the Chemical, Oil 
and Drug Cartel, 

• Henry Kissinger, 
former secretary 
of the Rockefeller 
brothers fund, 

• Etienne Davi- 
gnon, former EU 
Board member of 
drug maker 

People of Europe had no vote and no say! 

Further information: GB1ST321 


Chapter 1 

Ending Democracy and Returning 
to Medieval Times 

For the disbelieving reader, it may be helpful at this point to sum- 
marize the selection process of the first President and Foreign Min- 
ister of the Brussels EU: 

1 . The people of Europe were excluded from the decision-making. 

2. The new 'royals' of Europe were selected by an elite circle of 
corporate interests. 

3. The selection ceremony took place in a lavish aristocratic 
setting at the Palace of the Valley of the Duchesse, on the 
outskirts of Brussels. 

4. French President Sarkozy (Nicolas Paul Stephane Sarkozy 
de Nagy-Bocsa), the offspring of a petit-aristocrat, was the 
'master of ceremonies'. 

5. The 'queen's' crown was bestowed upon Baroness 
Catherine Ashton. 

6. The 'king's crown' went to another person whose name 
reflects aristocratic descent, Herman van Rompuy. Van 
Rompuy will act as an interim 'monarch' until such time 
as - possibly triggered by an international crisis - the 
petit-aristocrat himself assumes the throne. 

In fact, the EU system of governance reverses all democratic 
achievements of European civilization over the past thousand years 
and throws the entire continent back to Medieval times, when au- 
tocratic monarchs ruled Europe outside of any democratic control. 


Summarizing the evidence 

'Palace of the Valley of the Duchesse\ 
the site on the outskirts of Brussels 

where the selection ceremony for the 

President of the European Union 

took place on November 12, 2009. 

■ ■I a *7V ■ StJBT ■ 


i ii ii 

1 ftpnf ifim i 

Hf- FP 

cc —' * 

■ n 

tv n: r 

■ ■ 

■ « j 

ii hi 1, 


l \ ' ^ 

The European Union portrays itself to the world as a role model for 
21 st century democracy. However, the Brussels EU coronation cere- 
mony should convince even the most skeptical reader that the Brus- 
sels EU construct is anything but a democracy. 

Further information: GB1MT165 


Reversing the Centuries-Long Struggle 
of Mankind for Democracy 

Birth of Democracy 

776 US Declaration 
of Independence 

Magna Charta 

. ■;" 

^"■'■^■i-. ■ M _,r._ 1 _» J L_J h L. 

■ n _u-._^,i_.._ _f„ ", , J,iJ 

■ ■ ■ - n tm Jm u. T rr ■— w -fc i r i i h 
. i « i. ■■ 'll. km Hk ■_ l irx" i/i n. _v . : i. x-i. ■ 
fV i i i - —h.i- iL-.L_ T . _^_,_ _. 







Ji HH 

l_jjii IK .§■■ 



1791 Polish Constitution ^ 

1 789 French Constitution 


Liberation of Developing Nations 
from Colonialism 

Did Millions of People Die in Vain Fighting 
for Democracy in WWI and WWII? 



Over 1 00 Million Victims in Two World Wars: 
The Cemetry of Soldiers Fallen in Normandie 

Chapter 1 

Did the People of Europe Give up 
Centuries of Democracy Voluntarily? 

For the Oil and Drug Cartel the 'Brussels EU' is merely an operative 
base from where it intends to conquer the world using political, 
economic and - if necessary - military force. Towards this end, the 
Cartel is currently trying to export the undemocratic construct of 
the 'Brussels EU' to other regions of the world. The African Union 
is already being modeled after the 'Brussels EU' - including an 'AU 

The political stakeholders of the Cartel are deceptively parading the 
'Brussels EU' as a model of 21st century democracy and peace. 
From the sheer scope of this global PR campaign, the people of the 
world may have the impression that the 'Brussels EU' was approved 
in a democratic election by the people of Europe and that this po- 
litical body reflects their will. 

But nothing could be further from the truth. The actual facts cast a 
characteristic light on the fundamentally undemocratic nature of 
the 'Brussels EU' - a warning sign for the world: 

• The only country where the people were allowed to vote on the 
'Lisbon Treaty' - the enabling act for the 'Brussels EU - was Ire- 
land, whose population constitutes less than 1% (!) of the total 
of Europe. And even this vote was the result of a mockery of 
democracy: In June 2008 the people of Ireland had rejected the 
'Brussels EU' construct in a resounding 'No'. But the political 
stakeholders of the Cartel in Brussels decided to ignore this vote. 
They bribed the Irish government into holding a second referen- 
dum and coerced a 'Yes' vote with a staggering amount of money 
channelled from the stakeholders of the Cartel to Dublin. 

• Over 99% of the population of Europe - numbering more than 
500 million people - were denied the democratic right to vote 
on the 'Lisbon Treaty' in a referendum. 


Summarizing the evidence 

The Stakeholders of the Cartel Deprived 
People of their Democratic Rights! 

I Voting allowed on 'Lisbon Treaty' 
I No voting allowed 

□ Non members 
of 'Brussels EU 



500 million Europeans were denied 
their democratic right to vote 
on the "Lisbon Enabling Act" 

This violation of all principles of democracy by the Cartel is no co- 
incidence. Opinion polls conducted across Europe showed a re- 
jection of the 'Brussels EU' construct by a vast majority of voters. 
The deceptive nature of the 'Brussels EU' is best characterized by 
the fact that whilst it is hailed by the Cartel stakeholders as a hall- 
mark of democracy, the most basic democratic rights are denied - 
in fear of the people. 

Further information: GB1SC834 


Chapter 1 

The strategic goals of the cartel 

On the previous pages, we summarised what the plans of the oil 
and drug cartel are for constructing the Brussels EU. Obviously, this 
bold manoeuvre is not a random exercise, but has profound eco- 
nomic motives. This page explains the why behind the Brussels EU. 

The financial groups behind the oil and drug cartel are interested in 
controlling giant global markets that affect literally every human life. 
Prominent examples of this are the areas of food, health and energy. 
Over the past century, the oil and drug cartel has expanded its markets 
in these three areas into multi-trillion dollar investment businesses. The 
construction of these giant global markets was based on two strategic 
tools: Firstly, the use of patents as tools for monopolizing markets. Sec- 
ondly, public disinformation with the goal of keeping the people illit- 
erate about the alternatives. As a result, every person in the 
industrialized regions of the world today pays around one third of 
their disposable income as "tributes" to this cartel. 

With the beginning of the 21 st century, the Cartel faces a fundamen- 
tally new challenge: All of its key markets - oil, drugs, agricultural 
chemicals and GMOs - are being threatened by new technologies 
that will ultimately replace the existing monopolistic and patent- 
based global markets. 

In this situation, the financial interests behind the Cartel know that 
their multi-trillion dollar business can no longer survive in a democ- 
racy. Thus, the undemocratic construct of the Brussels EU is a strate- 
gic step towards the setting up of a global dictatorship on behalf of 
these corporate interests. 

At the beginning of the 21 st century mankind stands at a crossroad. 
We have to decide whether we want to allow the oil and drug cartel 
interests to continue their domination over our lives - by the impo- 
sition of largely antiquated technologies - or whether we are ready 
to liberate ourselves from that yoke by taking advantage of new, in- 
dependent and sustainable technologies such as renewable ener- 
gies, science-based natural health and organic agriculture. 


Summarizing the evidence 

The Global Multi-Billion-Dollar Markets of 
the Chemical/Petrochemical/Drug Cartel 

per average 

Nutrition 1 


Health Care 2 


Energy 3 







• Synthetic food 




Oil, gas, 
synthetic fuels 
and other 


mechanisms of 
global control 







making the peo- 
ple of the world 
from Cartel 

ural health 









1 Av.% disposable income on food and non-alcoholic beverages. Source: Eurostat 

2 Av. % disposable income on health plus health-related taxes. Source: Eurostat 

3 Av. % disposable income on fuels for transport, utilities etc. Source: Eurostat 

The strategic goals of the Cartel: 

• Turn the lives and bodies of billions of inhabitants of our planet 
into a marketplace for their patented products. 

• Carrying over their multi-trillion dollar benefits from previous 
century technologies - including environmentally-damaging 
petrochemicals and toxic pharmaceuticals - into the 21 st century. 

Further information: GB1BD733 


Chapter 1 

Today Europe -Tomorrow the World 

Two months prior to the Lisbon Treaty coming into effect, the polit- 
ical stakeholders of the Oil and Drug Cartel left no doubt about 
their global ambitions. On October 7, 2009, the Daily Telegraph 
newspaper in the UK published an article titled: EU draws up plans 
to establish itself as 'world power'. If the Cartel gets its way, the 
Brussels EU will be a mere stepping stone towards the cementing 
of its economic and political conquest of the world. 

According to the Telegraph article, the first embassies of this unde- 
mocratic construct were being planned for strategic locations, 
namely: New York (the seat of the United Nations), Addis Ababa 
(the seat of the African Union) and Kabul (an area of interest due to 
the ongoing war in Afghanistan) - even before the Lisbon Treaty 
had come into effect. 

But long before the Lisbon Treaty had even been drafted, the Cartel 
was trying to export the political construct of the Brussels EU as a 
model to expand its control over other continents: 

• African Union. The architects of the African Union (AU) have not 
hidden the fact that the AU was modeled on the European Union - 
with almost identical institutional structures, including a so-called 
"AU Commission." The permanent seat of this commission is Addis 
Ababa in Ethiopia - apparently, the intended "Brussels of Africa." 

• ASEAN. In 2009, leaders of East Asian countries announced that 
they had laid the groundwork for an EU-style bloc that will cover 
half the world's population. Their plans echoed similar ones out- 
lined by Australian prime Minister Kevin Rudd in 2008. 


Summarizing the evidence 


Patented Chemicals, 
Petrochemicals, Pharmaceuticals 






From its new politburo in Brussels the Oil and 

Drug Cartel is now attempting to take control 

over the whole world. 

Further information: GB1TW421 


Chapter 1 

Enforcing Drug Patents as a Key Element 
of Global Economic Control 

Historically speaking, global wars have been fought using guns and 
bombs, with the goal of conquering and controlling other countries. 
Today, however, the key tools to achieve global control are eco- 
nomic and legal instruments, which are used as a means of con- 
quering not only governments and economies, but also, ultimately, 
societies and people. 

The key economic tools of the Brussels EU are patents; in particular, 
patents on chemicals, pharmaceutical drugs, genetically-modified 
seeds and other high-tech products. Of these, the most lucrative of 
all are patents on pharmaceutical drugs. In 2008, for example, total 
global pharmaceutical sales amounted to 773 billion dollars - an 
amount that surpasses the combined gross domestic product (GDP) 
of the world's one hundred poorest countries. 

As such, it is obvious that, when choosing the EU's first foreign af- 
fairs minister, the Cartel would pick somebody who had experience 
in this field. 

Catherine Ashton, in her previous role as EU Trade Commissioner, 
played a central role in the repeated seizing, at European ports, of 
pharmaceutical products being shipped from India to African and 
Latin American countries. 1 The only reason for these seizures: the 
drugs were produced by companies in India who specialise in pro- 
ducing generic (non-patented) drugs. These generic drugs - the only 
ones that can be afforded by poor developing countries - threaten 
the profits from patented drugs manufactured by European phar- 
maceutical companies. 


Economic Times, India. 6 September, 2009. 


Catherine Ashton was appointed as the EU 
trade Commissioner in 2008. In that role, 
one of her main functions was to police in- 
ternational trade and enforce drug patents 
as means of global economic and political 
control - thus ensuring the dependency of 
the developing world upon patented drugs 
from European exporters. 

m Her new appointment, as the EU's new for- 
eign affairs minister and Vice President of 
the Commission, will enable her to fulfill 
this role with even greater impact upon the 

Further information: GB1PT937 

Chapter 1 

Patents - the key tools to control the world 

The significance of patents in the strategic planning of the Brussels 
EU for world control deserves particular attention. In general, 
patents are: 

• legal documents - issued by the relevant government agency in 
a country - that define the right of ownership of a product or tech- 
nical process; 

• economic tools - to control national and international markets; 

• political instruments -through their role in the critical health sec- 
tor, pharmaceutical drug patents are also being used as strategic 
tools to control entire countries. 

A particularly malicious aspect of patents is that they are being used 
to form global corporate cartels beyond any national or interna- 
tional legislative control. Large multi-national companies do not 
need to formally unite in order to control the market for a certain 
product across a continent or the entire world - they simply need 
to stake out their territorial patent claims. 

Patents allow multinational companies to control entire sectors of 
societies across continents without being subject to restrictions such 
as national boundaries. In some industries, profits amounting to tril- 
lions of dollars are being chanelled to multinational companies 
without the public being able to identify the corporate beneficiaries. 

The effect of patents with respect to human health has been espe- 
cially devastating, in that drug multinationals have been seeking to 
monopolize what is arguably the most critical sector in any society. 
As a result, for decades, mankind has been prevented from having 
access to non-patentable medicine that is more effective, safer and 
more affordable in the fight against today's most common diseases. 

To coordinate their global claims, these multinational companies 
have established a "central cartel office": the Brussels EU. 


Summarizing the evidence 


Patented Chemicals, 
Petrochemicals, Pharmaceuticals 

Patents are key tools that control the world! 

The Brussels EU is attempting to extend its patent 

strategy to other continents - thereby enabling the 

Cartel to control the entire world. 

Further information: GB1PC887 

Chapter 1 

The key beneficiaries from the Brussels EU 

One glance at the graphics on the opposite page should be enough 
for any reader to understand the key beneficiaries from the political 
construct of the Brussels EU. 

From its inception the Brussels EU was constructed by the eco- 
nomic stake holders of the chemical/ pharmceutical cartel. The top 
illustration on the facing page supports this fact. It shows the relative 
financial contributions of taxpayer money paid by each of the 27 
member states to the Brussels EU in 2006. Considering the fact that 
the majority of smaller member states joined the Brussels EU only 
recently, the total 'investments' from the founding states over a pe- 
riod of half a century dwarf the financial contributions of the 'new- 

The graphic at the bottom of the facing page shows the relative 
number of patents filed annually from within each of the 27 mem- 
ber states of the EU. The largest number of patents are being filed 
from a group of coutries composed of Germany, France, Italy and 
the Netherlands. Collectively, the number of patents filed from these 
four countries amounts to more than 70% of all patent applications 
filed in the EU - that is, more than double the number from the 
other 23 countries taken together. 1 It is, therefore, no coincidence 

• Germany, France, Italy and the Netherlands are four 
of the six founder members of the Brussels EU . 

• the six founding members - together with Great Britain, 
another leading drug exporting nation - hold the majority 
of votes both in the 'Council of Europe' as well as the 
'European Parliament.' 

Following the signing of the Lisbon Treaty, the 'investors' in the 
Brussels EU are ready to collect the 'return' on their investments. 

1 Source EUROSTAT 2005. 


Summarizing the evidence 

Buying Europe for Patents 

Percentage of 
total EU financing 
in 2005 

Percentage of total 
EU patent applica- 
tions filed in 2005 


#:"f v ® 


There is a remarkable similarity between the ranking of financial 
contributors to the Brussels EU and the number of patent applica- 
tions filed from within those same member states. Since patents are 
valid throughout Europe, this picture shows which nations control 
high-technology markets - and ultimately life - in Europe. 

Further information: GB1KB632 


Chapter 1 

The Master Architect of the Brussels EU 

Questions that urgently deserve answers are: How could the archi- 
tects of the Brussels EU build such an undemocratic construct from 
within democratic European countries - and who were these men? 
In fact, the key architect of the Brussels EU was Walter Hallstein 
(1901-1982), a prominent attorney in Nazi Germany. 

In June 1 938, Hallstein participated in the official State negotiations 
bewteen Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy with the goal of making 
these aggressive ideologies the basis for a future Europe. In January 
1 939, only months before the launch of WWII by the fateful coali- 
tion between IG Farben - the largest oil and drug cartel at that time 
- and the Nazis, Hallstein gave a historic speech outlining in detail 
the legal structure of Europe under Nazi/IG Farben control. 

In 1941, Hallstein became Dean of the Faculty of Law and Eco- 
nomics at the University of Frankfurt, Germany. It was no coinci- 
dence that Frankfurt was also the headquarters of IG Farben. A few 
years later, the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals revealed that it 
was from these IG Farben headquarters that the economic conquest 
of Europe was planned and implemented - with patents being the 
key legal tools for economic control. 

In 1 950, after having lied to the Allies about his Nazi past, Hallstein 
became advisor to West German Chancellor Adenauer and the 
principal coordinator of his foreign policy. As a result of his previous 
extensive experience in the planning for a Europe under the rule of 
the Cartel and the Nazis, he became the key architect of the Brus- 
sels EU. 

On March 25, 1 957, Hallstein was one of the 1 2 signatories of the 
Treaties of Rome - the founding document of the Brussels EU. In 
1 958 he was appointed the first president of the EU Commission - 
a post he held for an entire decade. 


Summarizing the evidence 

Walter Hallstein 


Hallstein was a member of the infamous asso- 
ciation of Nazi "Law Protectors/ 7 the organiza- 
tion built to become the legal pillar of a Europe 
under the control of the Nazi/Cartel coalition. 

1941 -1945 

Hallstein was professor of law and 
economics in Frankfurt, the Head- 
quarters of the world's largest 
chemical cartel and main Nazi fin- 
anciers, IG Farben. 


Hallstein was appointed the first 
president of the so-called 'EU- 
Commission'. He built the Brussels 
EU and ruled Europe for ten deci- 
sive years from this giant building 
with the help of thousands of un- 
elected bureacrats - on behalf of 
cartel interests. 


Hallstein was the political 
mastermind of the negotia- 
tions that led to the Treaties 
of Rome'. 

On March 25, 1957, Hall- 
stein was one of twelve sig- 
natories of these treaties that 
founded the 'Brussels EU'. 

Further information: GB1WH799 


Chapter 1 

The Cartel Architects of the Brussels EU 

(T) European Coal and Steel 
Community (ECSC) 

Leading Lawyer 


(2) Western European 
Union (WEU) 


f%\ European Economic 
Community (EEC) 


(f\ European Atomic 

Energy Community (EURATOM) 


Today's Brussels EU is built upon a series of predecessor organiza- 
tions that gradually led to the current construct. The first cycle of 
organizations was completed in the 1 950s and included the Euro- 
pean Community for Coal and Steel (ECSC) in 1 951 , the European 
Defense Community (EDC) (a project that was rejected by the 
French Parliament in 1954), the European Economic Community 
(EEC) and the European Atomic Energy Community (EAEC or 
EURATOM) in 1957. 

All those organizations had several key elements in common: 


Summarizing the evidence 

Construction Treaties of the 'Brussels EIT 















Community (EC) 

(Economic, domestic 
and foreign policies) 


European Community 
\iJ for Coal and Steel (ECSC) 




Europ. Econon 

lie Community (EEC) 

Police PJCC 

Foreign Policy CFSP 

cu ; 

2^^H edc 



EU Commission Hallstein 



1 . They were driven by the German Oil and Drug Cartel - after the 
1 945 defeat of the Nazi/Cartel coalition - in an effort to organize 
its next attempt at the conquest of Europe. 

2. The texts of the treaties were prepared by legal stakeholders of 
the Oil and Drug Cartel, most notably Walter Hallstein, in order 
to secure the dictatorial structure needed for this conquest plan. 

3. Five other European countries, France, Italy and the Benelux 
countries were lured to join these 'Communities' with the de- 
ceptive promise of peace, security and economic prosperity. 

Further information: GB1CA582 


Chapter 1 

The 'Sicily Six' - 

From June 1 to 3, 1 955 the decisive preparatory meeting for the 'Eu- 
ropean Economic Community took place in Messina, Sicily. The par- 
ticipants at this meeting should become known as the 'Sicily Six/ 

Gaetano Martino, MD, Italy. Conference Host. 

Formal legal education: None. 

Before and during WWII: Member of the Italian 
Fascist movement under Mussolini. 

Post-WWII career as member of the 'Sicily Six' 

Antoine Pinay, France. 

Formal legal education: None. 

During WWII: Member of the 'National Council of 
Vichy' - the French puppet regime established by 
the Nazi/Cartel Coalition in occupied France. 

Joseph Bech, Belgium. 

Education: Law School 

Profession: In the year of his admission as attorney, 
1914, he became deputy of a right-wing party. 
Held various political functions throughout his life. 


Willem Beyen, Netherlands. 

Education: Law School 

Profession: Business executive (Phillips, Unilever), 
banker, various political functions. 

Paul-Henri Spaak, Luxemburg.. 

Education: Law school 

Profession: Few years of private legal practice. 
From 1925 onwards various political functions. 


Summarizing the evidence 

And the Nazi/Cartel Law Professor 


Hallstein signing the 

'Treaties of Rome' 


His signature as a 'found- 
ing father' 


The limited legal experi- 
ence of these five 'found- 
ing members' of the 
'Brussels EU', contrasts 
with that of the sixth 
member, Walter Hallstein. 

By the time of the 'Rome 
Treaties' Hallstein had al- 
most three decades of experience in the fields of education, teach- 
ing and research at German Law Schools and Institutes with a focus 
in comparative international law and economics: 

• Education at the Law Schools of Bonn, Munich, promotion to 
'Doctor of Law' at the University of Berlin 

• Elite training in 'Comparative International Law' at the 'Kaiser 
Wilhelm Institute' in Berlin, financed by the IG Farben Cartel 

• Almost 20 years as Dean of the Faculties of Law and Economics 
at the Universities of Rostock and Frankfurt. 

One look at Hallstein's Curriculum Vitae documents shows us who was 
really pulling the strings in crafting the legal basis for the 'Brussels EU'. 


Chapter 1 

Hallstein and Project 'Scorched Earth' 

How could Hallstein - with his dark background in the Nazi/Cartel 
history -become the chief architect of the Brussels EU' and the first 
president of the EU commission? 

The answer to this question is strikingly simple: Firstly, Hallstein 
had to lie to the Allied High Command in post-war Germany about 
his membership of various Nazi organizations. Secondly, he had to 
make sure that his numerous publications and presentations as a 
crusader for the Nazi cartel conquest of Europe were destroyed. 

The facing page documents a printout from the German National 
Library using the search term 'Walter Hallstein'. This - the most 
comprehensive online library in the whole of Germany - lists the 
following publications by him: 

• Before 1 933 (the year the Nazi/Cartel Coalition seized power in 
Germany) one finds one single publication. 

• After 1945 and the defeat of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition one can 
find more than 1 00 books and publications by Hallstein. 

• Amazingly, between 1 933 and 1 945, during the terror regime of 
the Nazi/Cartel coalition, one can find only one single publica- 
tion by Hallstein. This absurdly short list of one publication in 
1 2 (!) years deserves an explanation - especially considering the 
fact that during this period Hallstein was Dean of the Law Faculty 
of two major German universities. 

There is only one explanation for this fact: Hallstein and his Cartel 
accomplices had tried to make sure that none of his speeches and 
publications as an advocate for the Nazi/Cartel coalition and its 
take-over of Europe survived. This 'Policy of Scorched Earth' was a 
precondition for the political rise of Hallstein to become the found- 
ing father of the 'Brussels EU.' 

To answer the question 'Who is the real Hallstein?' for the people 
of Europe, we have included a special chapter about him. 


Summarizing the evidence 


Etd^biQl^ der Sudn wacte per=hafcteitf *md J*if= IP2VI95J 
wii BthI-chmJ; i3e*H*nitrr Beblmd 

5^hm gfc-inr. -Frqnk^rt.ll - Ifrnpigntnl 


Lawi- firhunii »Fla "- 

BypLhc l-si dy r h:^.:-:, itiuDy f-; Jba am ±4- Sutij]pu^44ti 

■■ViiHMiHl-Li^ urtd Pnknk 
FianWji i.M. : Kkjacy: rr.- ■ C iflqfl 

Hfliht^n. hVdtor- -Hektdberg; l 5dme 

Die PEnchhgnrig rJes Ge5drKtiarb*»toi5. 

KHNrr.wi, h^i^m Frankfurt* M ■ Brflijen-trn vg-L^agcHLj^S 

Nazi Regime 

9 Die i|**Tirertity- dr GcpefTwart 

Hsiiaton. WJte- -BBrlrirVMj 

1 4J Dfif ijaOyr S -.'-J i l I", a f-j>ji vttmQ I m hryTEallaT ^ 

Printout from the online search service of the German National Library. 
The search term 'Walter Hallstein' results in one single document during 
12 years of Hallstein's role as promotor of the Nazi/Cartel's attempt at 
world conquest. 

Further information: GB1WH733 


Chapter 1 

The Cartel's Patent Expert C.F. Ophuels 

Obviously, Hallstein was not alone in his 
role as the chief architect of the 'Brussels 
EU'. He surrounded himself with legal tech- 
nocrats who had already been instrumental 
stakeholders of the Nazi/ Cartel Coalition 
prior to 1945. 

Since the key tools of the Cartel to secure its 
future control over Europe were patents, it is 
no surprise that Hallstein chose - as his right 
hand man - an expert in patent law: 

During the Nazi regime, Carl Friedrich Ophuels had been the lead- 
ing Court expert of the important Patent Court in Frankfurt (Ger- 
many), the city of the IG Farben headquarters. In this role, Ophuels 
was familiar with all patent disputes relating to the spoliation by 
the IG Farben Cartel of the chemical industries in the conquered 
countries of Europe. This fact qualified him, of course, as an accom- 
plice for the Cartel's next attempt at the conquest of Europe. 

The 1 946 Allied Denazification questionnaire reveals that Ophuels 
was a member of the Nazi-Party, the NSDAP, with the membership 
No. 2 399061 (document A). Because of his Nazi past, the Allied 
Security Office in 1 947 classified Ophuels as follows: "This individ- 
ual was previously found unemployed by Military Government for 
any position above ordinary labor" (document B). 

However, Hallstein's judgement of Ophuels was in direct contrast 
to that of the Allied Office. Together with Gerhard Schiedermair - a 
member of the notorious Schiedermair clan of Nazi lawyers - Hall- 
stein promoted Ophuels within one year (1 949) to 'Doctor' and 'Pro- 
fessor' of Law at the University of Frankfurt. One year later, in 1 950, 
Hallstein appointed Ophuels to the position of 'Ambassador in Brus- 
sels' and his right hand man for the construction of the 'Brussels EU'. 


Summarizing the evidence 

Is Appointed Hallstein's 'Man in Brussels' 


Urih-fliiiaiif rlilH *r.iniruri un llii* |L*Fj 




C *Wfl "h T"J ! m T 

""" '*' 



ht*tt ip4>ib« uhJb^ 

Wflh**Te aft- l-rti: *«iP*#W- 


ij.tW 1 *-^ ■ 

s^ L*±±_ #*— #%^ 


l^r^r-rLw. Ht^ ,Jt| 


■■■■■: - ..J 


— ^ j M^ ! — 

■ _! ■ 


pi-Bi-ha-| »■■■ ■ ■f»m l4Ji r ^ lw I- wrp . 
tCEl--PaT{i h^l | h-i 

■■ \S;y 


fcjt*d*>r*ifl KmnHfurL /...tain 
4Jtl *i3 flB J»n^ 

( LnHQX J.J 

r'itn- 4 nbraaqy 1*17 

iAVmu- 194? 


■ r - 

^Jl 'rledPltill 

ib Gliding bc fcjonb*r£ i-Tn- ,21 , .1ttB.innt.T-- 

bin %!«an tclt^ bolero n tribunal 
tfEP- y h - ojid&r ?fc* i-* fw llmrotl'J-i 

i: nor been rrnpj»tf^itf Go 
■jjjiIi-jj:irL «j '.:J'juriL 

P. Th±a IrcSivid-Jti vna 

jjf4Vl'.::inljr Fl-AiB-I ILEL*l]Jpl4J*d bj 

UlJlt«i7 titt^jfiAimt far ib./ paflitifctt 


elRpitytaoEit rinirl-Haeu, ir» hm:. 
with rnin-d-Jr 

1. CyLiilfl OaXl Ft. 

Tflluihd ft ia Ka , V«a= , Mr.K/"?B i ^H-LiJ- 

nurda -von elDflr ': h i'; 7r:- jl*lcvti] 

voriiQ-pjrk y^rl HB ■ = -- JibLu* 

Lc-i Lbi urili;iiii|-Jit> Lu:. ■: jr.i ia-LJ^i*-B 

IT^X-la JTriiAbftE 1'iXGIi lie .'iLLlitrtv- 

aL.EtaJiirj*j>itfi fu*r «J_Jit Tj.tJiik-il 

In Mart*jr»r MLa &ir*ohal J ckitif 
JLrbe-it UeiL-adsi- 

j; Did ikrt* die. iiill - 

EuBX. i -|:u£.LHJ.-iLD£ HLiX-Bll^triiB. 
B U PU di ctcg A 1 Of ;* ■ K 

(■J«,Ui,J U* H T LvjrrLBcn 

HI fcv i:\-H 
If] C 

Further information: GB1C0266 


Chapter 1 

'Politically Reliable' Cartel Nazi Becomes 

Cuil ||J1 lfclH£ 


X SI .1 | v./nTienbiiiid 

I <ei 1_*j.l. duj .-1:1 uifcE-ufrjji|ft*VF 


FwUu - - Ili^ ->p rZJI 
rid ..-.- i rwLh- — v--- ■* .'.In', 

«■ JdJd i^t?* 



:^jt "-LL-.*"ir ■ 

/ z i I D u rv . 

Do-i Jjr£.r=:n - rr £rf -; ■ 
L nn d% sjp i! jn t oc:t j ft^j.* 

crcd l u J h_t r ^ L i! or -3lt-j 5c-jn.t, " :■ J 7.1 i p;si.;^ -id- .T:.! P|-t ifJ-j-Li d\ f 
fi u'b-rr t j-ij^un ,, j|laj_- _. .■; u ?tf rjj i.n -Ey '■ - . ?. ■'■ -*■*[ . r f n 'i -4 iti ;• 

b«n F-.'-uJS ETE , jnr 

j/- [»>: p*Il£*ml JdMrr2 2ft^ 

: , ^jcr.i£^ri. , .icr- < 

On December 1 7, 1 941, the Nazi Party head office in Frankfurt, in an 
official letter to the Rector of Frankfurt University, attests that C.F. 
Ophuels is a "Politically reliable" ["politisch verslassicher"] Nazi. Only 
16 years later, this devoted stalwart of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition signs 
the 'Statutes for the European Court of Justice' as a principal architect. 

We, the people of Europe, have to realize that the foundation of the 
European Court of Justice -the highest Legal Organ of today's 'Brus- 
sels EU' - has been crafted and signed into law by stakeholders of 
the Nazi/Cartel Coalition, including registered Nazi Party members. 

For half a century, the Cartel was able to suppress the appalling cha- 
rade of its political stakeholders. Now that the truth is finally out, how- 
ever, the democratic legitimacy of the 'Brussels EU' is gone. No 
democratic organization - and no voter - can ignore this criminal past. 


Summarizing the evidence 

Founding Father of the European Court 

European Court of Justice 
- The Highest Court in Europe - 



Protocol on the Statute of the Court oUuttke 
Or the Eump^n E ccm u m ic Community 

I.L K4 NFi: AN If m i ¥%i »1 If ' f i NM W."NITV, 

HAVE DESIGNATED jp rhvir Pk-nvuGnliAriH; 


itii-M J. Ch_ SNOT cfc dWPfi RRS. ^iriin-Cwtf dI «f rib* Mlnliiry *f EwimiL: All:ihr». 
I lend of lht Hc-IrIiib n>lL*fliriiin Inlnc InttfENU'ramcnlJii rnnferon ■.■.■: 

the PKh.mnhvi aKiiih kf:i>fi^lhkfiei.kcf<;kr^vy_ 

:'.. Ii-mil I'l.i ill I ii.lii. KHr'Hl I S. \ :nl, n,,. .Iiii .'I :!■--- h ■ - 1 ■ ■ : ■ I l> i |in >li>. i>l ! , . • in . ii;, . 
Hl-mI i.I rlii^rfiiM^n iklL-tjalHJii C-ii I hi I nlVr pi%n ii*ir*l:Jl f »iifr item- l-: 


Mr. Rrfbtri MARJOUM. FTufHsar #f F«ulti« *f Liw. 

Urpwfy Ht*d uf thi 1 French ikkiinriNn I*1nc IntcTKuu'ruincvil il Cpnfi'rcnc?: 

On April 17, 1957, C.F. Ophuels - Nazi Party member no. 2 399061, 
membership duration May 1, 1933 to 1945 (the entire Nazi reign) - 
became a key 'founding father' of Europe's Highest Court. 

Further information: GB1PR598 


Chapter 1 

IG Farben and the Criminal History 
of the German Chemical Cartel 

Who were the Cartel interests Hallstein, Ophuels and their accom- 
plices in 'grey suits' served? The IG Farben Cartel was formed in 
1 925 by Bayer, BASF, Hoechst and a few smaller German chemical 
companies. It was the world's largest company in the emerging 
fields of dyes ["Farben" in German], chemicals, pharmaceuticals, 
plastics and other patented synthetic products. 

With tens of thousands of patents, IG Farben was the world's largest 
patent holder at that time. The only step missing for world control 
was the extension of its patents to monopolize the giant emerging 
markets of patented synthetic products throughout the rest of the 
world. As early as 1 904, Bayer chairman Carl Duisberg had already 
called for the formation of such a cartel, setting the explicit goal for 
the German chemical industry to "rule the world". 

Towards this end, Bayer, BASF and other German chemical com- 
panies were instrumental in supplying explosives and poison gas 
to the German Imperial army to launch WWI. In 1 91 8, due to the 
heroic efforts of the world community, the German army was de- 
feated and the first attempt of the German chemical cartel to 
achieve world conquest had failed. But the Cartel did not give up. 

BAYER, BASF, HOECHST - operating since 1925 as the IG Farben 
Cartel - financed the rise of the Nazi party and prepaired it techni- 
cally and logistical ly for the next attempt at world conquest, WWII. 
By 1 942, the chemical industries of half of Europe were under the 
control of the IG Farben cartel. In 1945, the second attempt for 
world conquest also failed. In 1948, several IG Farben directors 
were sentenced during the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal for 
genocide, slavery, plunder and other crimes against humanity. 




Summarizing the evidence 

The economic driving forces 
behind two World Wars 


First attempt of oil and drug cartel to conquer the world 
By 1914 these 3 companies controlled over one thousand 
patents, by far the world's largest number of patents con- 
trolled by any corporate group at that time 


The world's largest chemical/pharmaceutical cartel fi- 
nances the rise of the Nazis and prepares them for war 


Second attempt of oil and drug cartel 
to conquer the world fails 


Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal 
IG Farben executives are tried and sentenced for 
genocide, slavery, plundering of Europe and other 
crimes against humanity - including the build-up 
of the concentration camp Auschwitz. 

Further information: GB1DF377 


Chapter 1 

The IG Farben Cartel Built Up 

the World's Largest Extermination Camp 

In return for financing the rise of the Nazis and equiping them for 
WWII, the IG Farben cartel was the primary economic beneficiary 
from the conquest of Europe. An example of the close collaboration 
between Farben and the Nazis is the Auschwitz concentration camp. 
Financed with a credit of 1 billion Reichsmark, from the Deutche 
Bank and Dresdner Bank, IG Farben built the largest industrial com- 
plex in the world at that time in the Polish city of Auschwitz. 

The "IG Auschwitz" plant was to produce the synthetic rubber, 
gasoline and other chemicals for the Nazi/IG Farben conquest of 
Russia and Asia. For the construction of this giant plant, the nearby 
Auschwitz concentration camp was extended and became the 
world's largest slave labor and later extermination camp. 

These and many other crimes committed by the IG Farben cartel, 
in Auschwitz and elsewhere, are documented in the records of the 
Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal against leading executives of this 
cartel. Most shocking among these documents are the deadly med- 
ical experiments - the majority of which were conducted with 
patented pharmaceutical drugs from BAYER, HOECHST and other 
IG Farben companies. The Nuremberg Tribunal also revealed that 
some of the doctors conducting these deadly experiments, includ- 
ing Dr. Vetter, were - at that time - paid employees of BAYER. 

For more information about the role of the Oil and Drug 
Cartel behind WWII, Auschwitz and other war crimes: 

More than 50,000 authentic records from the Nuremberg 
War Crimes Tribunal against the IG Farben Cartel. 


Summarizing the evidence 

BAYER, BASF, HOECHST (IG Farben Cartel) 
The architects of Auschwitz 





/G Auschwitz extended over 24 km 2 IG Auschwitz was built with tens of 
(6000 acres). It was a 100% subsidiary of thousands of slave laborers from the 
IG Farben (BAYER, BASF, HOECHST). Auschwitz concentration camp. 

BAYER and HOECHST tested their BAYER employees conducted tests with 
patented drugs on thousands of in- patented BAYER drugs in the Auschwitz 
mates, most of whom were killed. concentration camp. 

Between I and 3 million people were 
murdered in Auschwitz with Zyclon B 
- a gas manufactured by the BASF/ IG 
Farben subsidiary Degesch. 

In 1948, directors of the IG Farben car- 
tel were tried in Nuremberg. Chairman 
C Krauch and others were sentenced 
for genocide, slavery and other crimes. 

Further information: GB1AU388 


Chapter 1 

With the 'Coup' to Impose the 'Brussels EU' 
the Cartel Exposes its Own Criminal Past 

Over the past half century, the Oil and Drug Cartel has done every- 
thing possible to conceal the truth regarding its unscrupulous crim- 
inal past as the instigator of two World Wars. 

For more than 6 decades now, the stakeholders of the Cartel have: 

• paid hundreds of billions of dollars for the cover up, 

• built media empires for the manipulation of public opinion, 

• had history books re-written and global news censored, 

• financed and raised generations of politicians - from left to right - 
in dozens of countries, 

• placed 'gatekeepers' in important academic disciplines, including 
science, medicine, history, political and social sciences as well as 
other key areas of society such as churches, trade unions etc., 

• and mercilessly hunted those who dared to break the silence. 

All of this happened for one reason only: to hide the Cartel's crim- 
inal past until it had successfully completed its third attempt at the 
conquest of Europe which, this time around, it intends to achieve 
via the 'Brussels EU'. The cover-up of the largest crime in history - 
the Cartel's role behind WWII - has cost the cartel hundreds of bil- 
lions of dollars over the past half century. 

This staggering amount of money, spent by stakeholders of the Car- 
tel to cover-up its criminal past, can only be explained by one fact: 
the Cartel is fully aware that the exposure of its past would destroy 
the plans for its next attempt at conquering and controlling Europe. 

The signing of the 'Enabling Act of Lisbon', along with the coercion of 
the people of Europe under the 'Brussels EU', make the publication of 
the historic documents and facts contained in this book a necessary and 
timely event. The spread of this information across Europe and the world 
will expose the Cartel's role behind the 'Brussels EU' and prevent the 
Cartel from launching another attempt at world conquest. 


Summarizing the evidence 

World War II: Conquest War 
on Behalf of the Oil and Drug Cartel 



KUUCini^inTt:tfi(r t£T=K 

i:0JI3IJ'lTl;Ji 03 MiUTAltY AmiKfc 

UKlTfcli STWTtti ttttfirii^fi 

. !:■■! ili- i ■■■ 

S. fit*-.. lfiT 

I HI. 

fi. Iter. 146 

rfHlhi.- flrP »l 

ldnill Lii.4-- ■ -I ■. i-h-ii-K-fil* 

iiiniii.i |, ..h;. 

p. p|. fU.UH -VlA II-HIjiL. "miitmiI |-3vl? pit tth- 



■ 1IDI..7-J 

-J-LII-..UU. (fl j 

This is the title page from the official 1945 report that followed 
Hearings of the US Congress on the causes of WWII. It runs to over 
a hundred pages and unequivocally proves that WWII was a 'Con- 
quest War' conducted on behalf of the Oil and Drug Cartel. The 
goal of WWII was the same as that of WWI: to control the multi 
trillion dollar emerging world markets in chemicals, petrochemi- 
cals, and pharmaceutical drugs. 

These official government records were hidden away in archives for 
more than six decades. Despite being key documents regarding the 
greatest crime in human history, they were not even published on 
the website of the US Government. Now, finally, you can study them 
yourself at 

Further information: GB1SR299 


Chapter 1 

Made Public After 7 Decades of Silence: 
The War Crime Records of the Cartel 

We have obtained more than 50,000 pages from the official records 
of the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal against the IG Farben cartel. 
For the first time in more than seven decades, the authentic records 
(including the horrifying exhibits) of this 1 947/8 trial against the di- 
rectors of BAYER, BASF, HOECHST and other IG Farben companies 
have been made public and are accessible online worldwide. 

When studying these historic records, you will realize that you have 
been systematically deceived about the true cause of World War II, 
the largest crime in the history of our planet. For example, you will 
learn that: 

• WWII could not have taken place without the financial and lo- 
gistical support of BAYER, BASF, HOECHST and other IG Farben 
companies, the world's largest chemical and pharmaceutical car- 
tel at that time. 

• WWII was not primarily fought for national or racial reasons but 
on behalf of the IG Farben Cartel and its attempt to conquer and 
control the emerging multi-trillion dollar chemical, petrochemical 
and pharmaceutical markets across Europe and the world. 

• WWII was not the result of a perverted psychopath by the name 
of Adolf Hitler. In contrast, Hitler and the Nazi hooligans were 
the political and military puppets of the IG Farben Cartel. Accord- 
ing to the Prosecution in the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals, 
WWII was the result of a coordinated technological, logistical, fi- 
nancial, political and military effort by - what the prosecution 
called - the "marriage" between IG Farben and the Nazis. 

• The Auschwitz concentration camp was not the 'product' of some 
SS lunatics, but a slave labor camp for IG Farben's giant industrial 
plant, IG Auschwitz, that was to produce the synthetic fuel and 
rubber for the conquest of Eastern Europe, Russia and Asia. 


Summarizing the evidence 

The Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal 
Against the Oil and Drug Cartel 


-rn-n k-*t>^ ::ili-a:<v ^ 
14 August 1 W, 


CiBL S^ISH. HBUUHDl ttHHIHp ffiff-G 

miHUfirTH.;-! riLT^i A!JHKQ£J a I7JLK KftlSQ- 
•IBliAlffl, s^r BU^IN, HEICKIDH , 

rmVj seefh 7mr mm hszcb, elub 



JudE* DurtiH 5iiakfl p Residing 

Juape Jwbb- Morula 
Judga CLnrtJiDE F* Hctt*1L 




u»D F^H3 wjutapt rmuwLs 

din Ufl. H*J« Hri 

Gklrf rf "crt^fli&Lj Brie* CHu^ T^ier p Kr* Mbodip 
Ur. irrabKip Kir* Sprtdhaxj l*r* ILLn5ka£r p fiian Kiifsr, 
■tv 5harnsia a n .r_ns iLstufnwr.p r.^r. r^BnaDp. Mr, Van 
Strait, Jrtr* BftlHtalQp :.^ P Ls*y. 

Title page of the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal Case No. VI "The United 
States of America vs. Carl Krauch and other IG Farben Directors/' which 
lasted from August 27, 1947 until July 30, 1948. 

Further information: GB1NT954 


Chapter 1 

Exposing Half a Century of Deception 

If the cartel's decisive role behind WWI and WWII 
had been exposed in the past, these corporate inter- 
ests would never have had the chance to launch an- 
other attempt at the conquest of Europe and the 

As such, the hiding of its criminal past was a precon- 
dition for the Cartel's buildup of the 'Brussels EU'. 

On the previous pages of this book, we exposed the 
Cartel's deceptive strategy. The facing page summa- 
rizes the essential facts: While the Cartel's political 
and military stakeholders were sentenced in Nurem- 
berg, its legal and economic stakeholders were com- 
missioned to prepare and implement the Cartel's 
third attempt at European and world conquest. 


Summarizing the evidence 




"Brussels EU" re- 
builds the "Uni- 
formed Arm" of 
the Cartel - whi 
it had sacrifio 
after the unsuc- 
cessful last attempt 
at world conquest. 


Chapter 1 

Third Attempt of the Oil and Drug Cartel 
to Conquer and Control the World 

When reading this book, you may think that the startling information 
presented cannot be true, for, if it were, you would surely have heard 
about it before. There is, however, a simple reason why you may not 
thus far have been aware of these facts. 

Since its two prior attempts at world conquest - WWI and WWII - 
had failed, the stakeholders of the Cartel knew that the only way a 
third attempt could be successful would be if its involvement in the 
two prior attempts could essentially be eliminated from the memory 
of mankind. Otherwise, how else do you explain that more than sixty 
thousand pages from the Nuremberg Tribunals against the IG Farben 
cartel were hidden away for more than six decades in international 
archives? Why did it take the authors of this book to help release this 
information and publish it online 

While the military and political stakeholders of the Cartel during 
WWII were held responsible for the death and destruction they 
caused, their economic masters continued their relentless efforts to 
achieve their ultimate aim. Towards this goal, they simply financed 
the rise of a new generation of political stakeholders in key countries. 

Helmut Kohl, a former BASF employee, was promoted to become 
German Chancellor - a post he held for 1 6 years. During that time, 
he spent billions of dollars of taxpayers' money to finance the 
buildup of the Brussels EU. Angela Merkel, his political protegee, 
holds this post today. In parallel, in France, the 'heirs of the architects 
of Auschwitz' promoted Nicolas Sarkozy to power. After the rejec- 
tion of the Brussels EU by the people of France and the Netherlands 
in 2005, these two political executors of the Cartel coerced the 
heads of the rest of Europe into signing the Lisbon 'Enabling Act'. 


Summarizing the evidence 

The Heirs of the Architects of Auschwitz 
Became the Key Promoters of the 'Brussels EU' 

Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal 

Recognizing it as the driving industrial force behind WWII, the 

Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal ordered the dismantling of the 

IG Farben Cartel into its main component companies. 


Fritz Ter Meer 

IG Farben director, 
sentenced in Nurem- 
berg for slavery, plun- 
der and other crimes. 
AfterWWIh Chair- 
man of BAYER com- 
pany froml 956-1 967. 


Carl Wurster 

Board member of the 
IG Farben subsidiary 
that produced the 
gas for Auschwitz . 
After WWII: CEO, 
later deputy board 
chairman of BASF. 



Helmut Kohl 

Former BASF employee, protege of Wurster 
Became chancellor of Germany 1 982-1 998 


2005: With the help 
of the-then French 
interior minister 
Nicolas Sarkozy, the 
drug dwarf Sanofi 
'swallowed' the drug 
giant 'Aventis'. 

Angela Merkel in 1992 and 2009. Her mentor, 
Helmut Kohl, introduced young Merkel as "my girl." 

Angela Merkel 

• Political Executor of the German Cartel 

• Chancellor of Germany 2005 to today 

Nicolas Sarkozy 

• Political executor of French Cartel 

• French President 2007 to today 

Sarkozy and Merkel became the political enforcers of the 'Lisbon En- 
abling Act' and the Oil and Drug Cartel's next attempt to conquer and 
control Europe - and from there the rest of the world. 


Chapter 1 

The World at the Brink of 
a Global Dictorsip and WWII I 

History shows us that there were two preconditions for the attempts 
at world conquest by the Cartel: 

1 . The establishing of a dictatorship in the territory from where the 
conquest of the world is being launched. The Lisbon Treaty provides 
the legal basis for this. 

2. Systematic planning for military actions, including a new world 
war. The formation of a European army, when combined with open 
threats by leading political stakeholders of the cartel to use nuclear 
weapons, is an unmistakable step towards this. 

Thus, the historic parallel to the seizure of power by the Oil and 
Drug Cartel by means of the Brussels EU is the takeover of the Ger- 
man government by the same interest groups three-quarters of a cen- 
tury ago. The year 1933 is paralleled by the year 2009, when the 
Oil and Drug Cartel enforced its 'Enabling Act'. The year 1934 is 
paralleled by the year 201 0, when the dictatorship will show its true 
face by subjecting key sectors of society under its rule. The Sarkozy- 
backed plan for a centrally-controlled European economy is just the 

In light of these facts, the people of Europe and the world need to 
take action. The success of their efforts will depend upon the follow- 
ing preconditions: 

1 . The right political analysis. 

This book was written to provide this. 

2. Effective dissemination of this information to 
the people of the world. 

3. The organization of a movement of people who 
are committed to protecting democracy and peace 
in Europe and the rest of the world. 


Summarizing the evidence 

Parallels between 1933 and today 

Enabling Acts 




-Lisbon Treaty- 

Beneficiaries and 

Chemical, oil and 
drug cartel 

The same 

Ultimate Goal 

Economic and 
political control 

The same 

Territorial market 

Europe, then 
rest of world 

The same 

Leading country/ies 



Deceptive tactics 
to seize power 

False promises of 
"law, order and peace" 

The same 

Enabling Act 

German Enabling 
Act of April 1933 

Lisbon Treaty 

Triggering event 

Economic Crisis 
of the late 1920s 

Today's global 
economic crisis 

Preparations for 

Abolition of civil rights 

The same 


Public Opinion 

The same 


Chapter 1 

The Politicians who Delivered the European 

On 1 3 December, 2007, these Eu- 
ropean politicians signed the Lis- 
bon 'Enabling Act'. By doing so, 
they delivered the entire European 
continent into the hands of the 
Cartel. Just like the German Parlia- 
ment in 1933, these politicians 
paved the way for dictatorship and 
world conquest on behalf of cor- 
porate interests. And just like in 
1933, they gave this takeover a 
pseudo-democractic cover. 

Cartel's Key Political Executors 








Summarizing the evidence 

Continent into the Hands of the Cartel 




V A 


J?™ J 

Tusk Socrates Basescu Reinfeldt Ficocrop 

Poland Portugal Romania Sweden Slovakia 


Chapter 1 

Preventing History From Repeating Itself 

Since it is obvious that the political representatives of an entire con- 
tinent, Europe, failed to protect democracy, we, the people of the 
world, have to recognise our responsibilities and take action. In 
order to be able to do so, we need to understand history. The facing 
page summarises mankind's experience of the past century in a 
graphical form. 

Twice before, the Oil and Drug Cartel took Europe and the world 
into the abyss. More than one hundred million people paid with their 
lives as a result of these corporate interests' quest for global control. 
The twentieth century will go into the annals of history as the 'Cen- 
tury of Death and Destruction on Behalf of the Oil and Drug Cartel'. 
And now, at the beginning of the twenty-first century, we are faced 
with the situation that the same corporate interest groups are under- 
taking a third attempt to subjugate the world under its control. 

This third attempt today is particularly malicious because the Cartel 
is hiding its obvious motives of global control behind the deceptive 
propaganda of peace. The Cartel's political stakeholders are trying 
to convince the people that the Brussels EU is needed to prevent 
Europe from repeating the dreadful experiences of WWI and WWII. 

We now have to make a choice: Either we close our eyes and ig- 
nore these historical facts or we recognise our responsibility to 
prevent history from repeating itself and act. Clearly, the only way 
forward is to act. The first step to end the centuries of deception - 
that has kept millions of people illiterate about the real culprits 
behind the largest crimes in history - is to share this information- 
with others. 


Summarizing the evidence 

A Century of Death and Destruction: 

The Cartel and its Quest for World Conquest 





Wilhelm II 


and the 

Nazi Party 


"Brussels EU" 


'War Bonds' 


Enabling Act 

Enabling Act 

of ignoring 
the early 
warning signs 



World War I 

World War II 

1918 ^Y 1945 

Attempt for World Attempt for World 
Conquest failed J Conquest failed 



Chapter 1 

Lingering Shadows from the Past: 

For those of our readers who may argue that the modern-day situation 
cannot be compared to the horrors of the past, we would urge you to 
consider the following. 

The present minister of defence in Germany, Karl-Theodor zu Gutten- 
berg, was raised from the age of 14 by his step-father, who was the 
son of Joachim von Ribbentrop. Ribbentrop, of course, was Hitler's 
foreign minister from 1 933 to 1 945 and coordinated the military com- 
ponent of WWII, the Cartel's second war of global conquest. In 1 947, 
Ribbentrop was tried in Nuremberg and hanged for his crimes. 

One may argue that a mere family relationship does not necessarily 
predetermine allegiances with corporate interests or political strate- 
gies. In this case, however, the facts speak for themselves. German 
defence minister Guttenberg is an adamant advocate of the milita- 
rization of Europe and the launch of a European army. Pressured for 
resignation after publicly defending the killing of innocent civilians 
in Afghanistan by German troops, Guttenberg responded in front of a 
German TV audience: "I will definitely stay, even if a storm is blowing. 
That is the way I have been educated - and that is the way I will be- 
have." Clearly, the dark shadows of the Ribbentrop tradition are threat- 
ening the future of the world once again. 

The aggressive manner in which these European-wide militarization 
plans are being pursued by Germany and other drug-exporting coun- 
tries - and imposed on other EU member countries - leaves no doubt 
as to whose interests Guttenberg and other political stakeholders rep- 

There is an urgent need for the people to halt this development, par- 
ticularly considering the following fact: The last two conquest wars 
were started by the Cartel before the dawn of the nuclear age. The sit- 
uation today is fundamentally different. The arsenal of nuclear 
weapons in France and Great Britain, combined with the political de- 
cision-taking in Brussels, would give the Cartel interests direct access 
to these weapons. The only time to prevent this from happening is 


Summarizing the evidence 

From Ribbentrop to Guttenberg 

Joachim von Ribbentrop 
Hitler's Foreign Minister 
during WWII (above) 

In 1947 was sentenced to 
death and hanged for war 
crimes at Nuremberg (left) 

Carl Theodor zu Guttenberg 
German Defence Minister 
since 2009 

• Political stakeholder of 
modern-day corporate 
Germany - including the 
IG Farben successors, 

• Advocate of the milita- 
rization of Europe and 
the launch of a European 
army - under control of 
the 'Brussels EU' 

Shadows of the past? 

Further information: GB1RG532 


Chapter 1 

"Those who cannot remember the past 
are condemned to repeat it." 

Georg Santayana 

In this opening chapter of the book we con- 
fronted you with historical facts and information 
which you may have never heard about. 

We are aware that some of this shocking infor- 
mation is hard to accept and we encourage you 
to conduct your own additional research. 

Because all the facts presented here are based on 
historical records we are convinced that you will 
find everything in this book confirmed. 

Once you have realized to what extent you, your 
family, friends, and entire generations have been 
held in complete illiteracy about essential facts 
of history, you may ask yourself a decisive ques- 

'How much longer do we allow Cartel interests 
to determine the future of our continent'? 

The following pages will give you some ideas 
about what you can do, which will be further 
elaborated in the last chapter of this book. 


Summarizing the evidence 


of Lives ... 


of Profits 




International Oil and Drug Cartel 

Do You believe that in the 21st century these corporations 
will stop risking millions of lives to make billions in profit? 

Further information: GB1TA748 


Chapter 1 

The Historical Callenge of Our Time 

To correctly assess the current geopolitical situation, we must high- 
light an important difference between the previous two attempts at 
world conquest by the Cartel and its current attempt. WWI and 
WWII were attempts by the Oil and Drug Cartel from one country 
(Germany) to eliminate competition from other nations and multi- 
national companies to dominate the newly emerged market of 
chemicals, petrochemicals and pharmaceuticals. 

In contrast, the present attempt at world conquest via the Brussels 
EU is being pursued so vigorously for a different reason. Over the 
past decades, mankind has developed technologies that fundamen- 
tally threaten the monopoly of patented synthetic products. The 
products that are threatened currently form the very foundation of 
the economic power of the Cartel: 

• Oil. The monopoly of oil as the principal supply of the world's 
energy is being threatened by renewable forms of energy, includ- 
ing water (hydrogen), wind, solar, tidal, geothermal and others. 
As different as all these technologies are, they have one aspect 
in common - they liberate mankind from the dependency on oil. 

• Patented drugs. The monopoly on patented pharmaceutical 
drugs as the principal answer to the world's health problems is 
being threatened by science-based, effective, safe and affordable 
natural health approaches. 

• Patented food (GMOs). The attempt to monopolize and control 
the world's supply of food, based on patented genetically-mod- 
ified fruits, vegetables and animals (GMOs), is threatened by the 
growing popular demand for healthy, fertilizer- and pesticide- 
free organically-grown food sources. 

The meltdown of each of these global markets signifies a loss in the 
magnitude of hundreds of trillions of dollars. Moreover, the 


Summarizing the evidence 

interests behind the Cartel have realized that the people of the 
world are determined to defend these new liberating' technologies, 
making it impossible for them to defend their global patent-based 
markets in a democratic system. In this situation, the only option 
for the Cartel to protect its economic privileges is to escalate inter- 
national crises and instigate military conflicts with the goal of es- 
tablishing its dictatorial rule over the world. 

The people of the world have to realize that the current attempt of 
the Oil and Drug Cartel at world conquest is not the battle of one 
nation against the rest of the world, like in WWI and WWII. The 
battlelines today are drawn between the financial interests of a 
handful of corporate shareholders and the health and life interests 
of billions of people living today and countless others as yet unborn. 

This is the challenge of our time. But in this historic challenge also 
lies a breath-taking opportunity. 


Chapter 1 

A World For the People and By the People 

Since it is obvious that the political representatives of an entire con- 
tinent, Europe, failed to protect democracy, we, the people of the 
world, have to recognise our responsibilities and take action. What 
is needed now is a global movement that protects the inhabitants 
of this planet, today and in the future, from being sacrificed to the 
interests of the Oil and Drug Cartel. The very essence of this move- 
ment is to protect the health and lives of millions of people; there- 
fore, it will be a 'Movement of Life'. 

This book provides the historical analysis for the necessity and ur- 
gency for such a movement. The lessons of history documented in 
this book will end the decades of deception that have formed the 
basis for the rule of the Oil and Drug Cartel until now. 

This book shows that the desperate efforts by the Cartel to cement 
the Brussels EU and extend its influence around the world are no 
coincidence. They reflect the fear of the status quo that it may lose 
political and economic control of our planet. Alternative forms of 
energy are threatening to end the "Tyranny of Oil". Similarly, effec- 
tive natural health approaches are about to end the dependency of 
mankind upon patented toxic chemical drugs. 

The stakeholders of the status quo have realised that they can no 
longer preserve their economic interests in a democracy. The only 
way that their multi-trillion dollar markets with largely antiquated 
technologies can be maintained is by resorting to totalitarian forms 
of government. Thus, the aggressive attempts of the Cartel to seize 
power over Europe and the world, as documented in this book, are 
not a sign of strength, but of desperation. 


Summarizing the evidence 

The Birth of the 'Movement of Life' 

Why the Movement of Life will Succeed 

Understanding this historical analysis - regarding the increasingly 
desperate situation of the forces that have controlled the world in 
the past - is a precondition for the creation of a new world "For the 
People and By the People." The "Movement of Life" that has to un- 
dertake this historical mission has two primary goals: 

1 . Advance new technologies in the fields of energy, health and 
other key sectors of society that dismantle the monopoly of 
the status quo in these markets. 

2. Combine the democratization of these technologies with the 
promotion of political democracy, at the local, national and 
international level. 

By working toward these two goals, the "Movement of Life" will 
protect democracy, preserve peace and, thereby, inevitably over- 
come the plans of the Cartel for another attempt at world conquest. 

More about the urgency of the "Movement of Life" can be found in 
the concluding chapter of this book. 



Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

Chapter 2 


Nazi Lawyer - 
And Key Architect 
of the 'Brussels EU 


Chapter 2 

Walter Hallstein (1901-1982) 

Walter Hallstein was a prominent lawyer involved in the legal and ad- 
ministrative planning for a post- WWII Europe under the control of 
the Nazis and their corporate allies, the Oil and Drug Cartel IG Far- 

Hallstein represented the new breed of members of the Nazi/Cartel 
Coalition. He was trained by legal teachers whose primary goal was 
to sabotage the 'Versailles Treaty' defining the reparation payments 
imposed on Germany after it lost WWI. Early on in his career Hall- 
stein received a special training at the 'Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in 
Berlin/ This private institute was largely financed by the IG farben 
Cartel to raise its scientific and legal cadres for the Cartel's next at- 
tempts at the conquest and control of Europe and the world. 

While the rule of the Nazis ended in 1945, the rule of their accom- 
plices, the IG Farben Cartel and its successors BAYER, BASF, and 
HOECHST had just begun. As a strategic part of their plan to launch 
the third attempt at the conquest of Europe, they placed - a mere 
decade after their previous attempt had failed - one of their own at 
the helm of the new cartel 'politburo' in Brussels: Walter Hallstein. 

This chapter documents that the fundamentally undemocratic con- 
struct of today's 'Brussels EU' is no coincidence. Hallstein, a promi- 
nent Nazi lawyer - and expert on the IG«Farben concern - was chosen 
by these corporate interests to become the first EU Commission pres- 
ident with a specific assignment: to model the 'Brussels EU' after the 
original plans of the Nazi/IG Farben coalition to rule Europe through 
a 'Central Cartel Office'. 

The goal of the oil and drug interests then and now was the creation 
of a 'European Cartel Office' [i.e. the 'Brussels EU'] with a junta of 
unelected cartel bureaucrats [i.e. the 'EU Commission'] ruling over 
the people of Europe on behalf of global corporate interests, namely 
the Chemical, Oil and Drug Cartel. 


Walter Hallstein: Prominent Nazi Lawyer - And Key Architect of the 'Brussels EU' 

Master of Deception 

No single person had a greater influence than Hallstein on the pres- 
ent-day shape of the 'Brussels EU' and, thereby, on the Cartel's vision 
for the future of Europe. The facts about Walter Hallstein documented 
in this book will end decades of illiteracy about this 'founding father' 
of the 'Brussels EU'. 

By learning the background of this man, the people of Europe and the 
world will be able to identify the true interests and motives behind 
the construct of the 'Brussels EU'. 


Chapter 2 

The Key Architect of Today's 'Brussels EU' 

On March 25, 1957, Hallstein was made one of twelve 'founding fa- 
thers' - the original signatories - of the 'Treaty of Rome', the founding 
document of the 'Brussels EU', which he had co-authored. 

On January 7, 1958, Hallstein was appointed by the political stake 
holders of the Oil and Drug Cartel as the first President of the so-called 
'EU Commission/ the highest office of the European Economic Com- 
munity (EEC) and the precursor of the 'Brussels EU'. 

In 1963 Hallstein was appointed for a second 5-year term as president 
of the 'EU Commission'. To cement its grip over Europe, the cartel and 
its political stakeholders provided Hallstein - the first 'king' of modern 
Europe - with an appropriate 'castle', the giant 'Berlaymont' colossus 
in the center of Brussels (picture below). 

For a full 10 years, from 1958 to 1967, Hallstein commanded an army 
of thousands of bureaucrats - outside any democratic control. 

The political leaders of the 27 European nations who signed 
the 'Lisbon Enabling Act' failed to ask decisive questions: 

1 . Who conceived the undemocratic structure 
of the 'Brussels EU'? 

2. Where did the blueprint for the construct 
of the 'Brussels EU' come from? 


Walter Hallstein: Prominent Nazi Lawyer - And Key Architect of the 'Brussels EU' 

With the help of this army of obeying servants, largely paid for by the 
cartel and its political stakeholders, Hallstein modelled the 'Brussels 
EU' after blueprints designed two decades earlier by him and his ac- 
complices - for a Europe under Nazi / IG Farben control. 

51 years later, on December 1, 2009, the so-called 'Lisbon Treaty' im- 
posed the key elements of Hallstein's construct of the 'Brussels EU' - 
and thereby the core elements of the Nazi / Cartel master plan - upon 
the people of Europe. 

Thus at the beginning of the 21st century, as a 
direct consequence of historical unawareness: 

• 27 heads of State, by signing the so-called 
'Lisbon Treaty/ signed an 'Enabling Act'. 

• Similar to 1933, they sacrificed democracy 
and opened the doors for the rule over Europe 
by the same corporate cartel interests that 
failed to accomplish this goal during WWII. 

The new plan of the cartel to take con- 
trol of Europe was simple: Appoint a 
'king', endow him with a 'castle' and thousands of servile 
bureaucrats to rule - and deceptively portray this 
construct to the people as a symbol of democracy. 

But now that this fraud is exposed in this book - 
it can no longer be executed. 


Chapter 2 

Before and During WWII 
Hallstein Was a Member of 

Official Nazi Organizations 

Frtxr«.nar Trr t IUT+'-1*ti:ill#l*lBi 

,_a. itp Untvorfiit-it 

E * ■ t + C k 

Untffr 3*iugmhat oaf » Ihd IH#mUW «rtifim leb: 
IeJa Jujt* in dt«i- UnehkriagaEiit. u^gibArt 

n.Lu .^Ef*»unr d«D Rfllthjrtal-taaa dttltMiir .lath- 


As part of building their dictatorship and preparations for WWII, the 
Nazi/IG Farben coalition took care of the ideological alignment of all 
key sectors of society under their rule. One of the most important sec- 
tors was the legal profession, which was used to provide the dictator- 
ship with a legal 'fig leaf/ In 1933, immediately after seizing power, 
the BNSDJ [Bund Nationalsozialistischer Deutscher Juristen, i.e. As- 
sociation of National Socialist German Lawyers] was founded. In 1 936 
this organization was converted to the notorious Nazi 'Association of 
Law Protectors' [Rechtswahrer]. 'Law Protector' was the Nazi code 
language for systematically destroying the democratic legal system 
and replacing it with Nazi /fascist dictatorial law. 


Walter Hallstein: Prominent Nazi Lawyer - And Key Architect of the 'Brussels EU' 

Hallstein was a member 
of both the BNSDJ and the 
infamous Nazi 'Rechts- 
wahrer' Organization. 

Membership in this organ- 
ization was restricted to 
those individuals showing 
uncompromising support 
for, and participation in, 
the implementation of 
Nazi ideology and plan- 
ning for the conquest of 
the world by the Nazi/IG 
Farben coalition. 

The official badge of the Nazi 'Rechts- 
wahrer' ['law protectors'] organization 
with the Nazi swastika in the center. 


Prof. Dr. jur. Walter Hallstein 

Rostock, September 30, 1935 
StephanStr. 15 

To the Representative of the [Nazi] government at the University 


In reference to my oath of office I declare: 

in the post-war [WWI, i.e., after 1918] time I was a member of the 
following organizations: 

during my time as assistant lawyer [Referendar] I belonged 
to the Referendar Association of the [Nazi] Reich, 

as professor I belonged to the Association of German 
Universities of the [Nazi] Reich. 

Today I am a member of the 'Association of National Socialist Ger- 
man Law Professionals' ['Bund Nationalsozialistischer Deutscher Ju- 
risten', BNSDJ], the 'National Socialist Teacher's Association' 
['Nationalsozialistischer Lehrerbund', NSLB] and the lecturers. 


Chapter 2 

Hallstein - 'Protector' of the Nazi Laws 

The association of Nazi 'Law Protectors' was one of the pillars of the 
Nazi terror regime. The functions and responsibilities of the members 
of the Nazi 'Protectors of the Law' were defined in the official 'Pro- 
ceedings of the NS Law Protectors Association' [Schriftenreihe des NS- 
Rechtswahrerbunds] volume 5, 1938, as documented here: 

The National Socialist Alliance 
of the Protectors of the Law 

"The National Socialist Alliance of the Protec- 
tors of the Law (NSRB) is responsible for the 
professional organisation of the [Nazi] Ger- 
man legal profession. It is headed by Minister 
Dr. Frank 1 , the leader ['Reichsleiter'] of the 
Reich's Legal Office ['Reichsrechtsamt', i.e. 
the breeding ground of the Nazi terror laws] 
of the National Socialist German Workers' 
Party (NSDAP) [i.e. the official 'Nazi party') 

Through its leading positions the NSRB is 
being connected to the central offices of the 
Reich's Legal Office of the NSDAP. In this 
way it is assured that the political direction of 
the professional activity is identical with the 
will of the [Nazi party] NSDAP - and thereby 
with the leadership of the [Nazi] State. Thus, 
the association of the NSRB with the [Nazi 
party] NSDAP has a solid foundation." 

Frank, the Nazi's highest-ranking lawyer, was sentenced 
to death on October 17, 1946 for war crimes and crimes 
against humanity at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal. 

Hallsteins pledge - under oath - of his reliable support for the Nazi 
ideology and goals greatly furthered his academic career. On May 1 8, 
1936, merely eight months after his oath of Nazi allegiance, Hallstein 
was appointed 'Dean of the Faculty of Law and Economies' at the Ro- 
stock University in Nazi Germany. 


Walter Hallstein: Prominent Nazi Lawyer - And Key Architect of the 'Brussels EU' 

gr^rrf.- i*. rai 1*56. 

, flV : 

l - if O-r^nd ii*i Bhr tod. ilfea Etaizc HaiLiiiiji^t istuiiflQ- 
flJTiiniHfrr iE^ilt«D Srm-nhl L^un^ taxufv icd Si? .hl-vr» 

n*il ITlitlnr! 
Bit Alitor. 

%WL ^< *- 


The Chancellor 

of the University Rostock 

Rostock, May 18, 1936 

Based on the authority bestowed on my by the Reich Min- 
istry of Education , I am hereby appointing you to the po- 
sition of Dean of the Faculty of Law and Economics. I am 
asking you to inform me whom you appointed as your deputy. 

Heil Hitler! 
The Chancellor 


Prof. Dr. Hallstein 

Here [Rostock] 


Chapter 2 

After the 1945 Defeat of the Nazis 
Hallstein Suffered Acute Memory Loss 

After the defeat of the Nazi/IG Farben's attempt at world conquest, one 
of the first tasks for mankind was to make sure that the responsible 
criminals were punished and could never again commit such crimes 
against humanity. Among others, the Allies interrogated the bearers of 
German public offices - including university staff - about their Nazi 
past. Below is a facsimile of Walter Hallstein's official 1945 interroga- 
tion sheet (excerpts). 

PeTtonaiFragebagfln lur Hor.hicliulbBamlB 

4-PKM *-ita *• ■■-*■ VmMUmmmm* ■#♦*!** *" i n ■ 
JL PmenilhQKhrvlburtQ: 


■■ I i ihhfTimirn-rT Pti^ frfl* i TJf i >■■■■■—- ^- ■ ^t^- ■ ™ — i — * — p — 

fibriHI! £f£ttLftdJ*i ^LMTltfWfla JI^fI Glnkinmii IBM— IMiJ II - T jt W fe-fci 

B. Liuft.ihn und Tltlnkiltin h4i (HO: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
i. Wiha Hi id Ittfl Mhfllri 

J) El-ih pdJUiCbi OrAihluUM IhiirUlt J-r Uh>ri 'feiJ'.: 
fit* ji.ltgn h m fEnafik^^n Hun) 

II. Hjb*rt Si* 1-1*1 l-HH rtlfcnllicha v4#r »pl*r#Lj-f iml+ijl^ Ft*dtn ndjr VarlfLungHn fl»- 

i? Hahan Sli ruth linn bult- ^mn j* di±u btfetuiflan 

4} r,HI^F,|.l|g T l H ll l nitfcrP Mir IhMkM ^jtiMnshir \4*mn >ini-ihlliflliih Rl 

|j luidkilUiCNi +4*T 4<\$44m9*TMl+&m Id.ih iu i*rbhl§M*T 

fjPfLidkfftfft tidlr Gliilf ltM4ll*g piptr. dlj hfj ihlnlin UjLJDmn xu in-iflHn? &*Iil 

4} mlllllrl-NfciL #J"*0" srafldfuliihi uhd dlUUrfh ■ Impir-lIliUKtl Mil* XV -Y»ibr»Hvnf 


Walter Hallstein: Prominent Nazi Lawyer - And Key Architect of the 'Brussels EU' 

This document, entitled 'Personnel Questionnaire for University Offi- 
cials', was personally filled out by Hallstein in his own handwriting. 
In this official questionnaire, Hallstein blatantly denied having had any 
involvement with the Nazi regime - other than being a mere bystander. 
In contradiction to his public record - including his sworn Nazi alle- 
giance from 1 936 - he denied ever having been a member of any Nazi 
organization or a promotor of their ideology. 

Hallstein's barefaced lies about his Nazi past in official records consti- 
tute perjury. For a few decades, it seems, he got away with it. 

In 1 957, the Nazi legal front soldier' [Hallstein's self-portrait in 1 939], 
would be appointed to coordinate the Cartel's next attempt to conquer 
Europe by means of a new Central Cartel Office, the 'Brussels EU'. 

Now, half a century later, the fairy tale of Hallstein as a founding father 
of a democratic Europe collapses and, with it, the cornerstone of the 
entire 'Brussels EU' construct. 

Translation of Hallstein's Official 1945 Interrogation Testimony 
Given under Oath as Part of the Allied 'Denazification Program 9 

Name: Hallstein 
Age: 44 

Profession: Lawyer 

2. From 1933 on have you been a member of: 

Id). A political organization within the University? No. 
(If yes, please provide all details.) 

12. Since 1933, have you given any speeches, publicly or outside your academic 
work (e.g. radio, army, Nazi training institutions)? No. 

13. According to your best judgement, did you ever contribute to 

a) spread Nazi or similar 'racial' Ideas (including racial teaching and racial hatred? No. 

b) spread fascist and antidemocratic ideas? No. 

c) instigate hostility or contemptuousness against the united nations of the world? No. 

d) spread militaristic, including Greater-German and German-imperialistic ideas? No. 

Emphasis added 


Chapter 2 

Hallstein - Official Nazi State Negotiator 

In May 1938, with the Nazis' power 
firmly consolidated in Germany, Hitler 
pays an official state visit to Italy, the 
other fascist nation in Europe. Little 
more than one year before the Nazi/IG 
Farben coalition would launch WWII, 
Hitler and Mussolini initiated planning 
for a Europe under their control. 

This official Nazi State visit marks the 
beginning of close preparations for 
WWII in key areas - including the im- 
plementation of dictatorial laws across 
Europe - between the fascist govern- 
ments of Germany and Italy. To that ef- 
fect, a bi-national commission was 
established with the name 'Working Group of German-Italian Legal 
Relations' ['Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur deutsch-ltalienische Rechst- 

The primary goal of this group was to create the 
legal basis for the rule of the fascist/IG Farben 
coalition over Europe, to take effect once Ger- 
many and Italy had militarily subjugated the 
rest of the continent. Priority topics discussed 
were 'protection of intellectual property' [i.e. 
the extension of patents, particularly from the 
IG Farben Cartel across Europe] and 'protection 
of the race' [the code word for cementing the 
Arian race as the rulers of the world]. 

Only a few weeks after Hitler's 1 938 visit, the 
first meeting of this group of fascist/nazi 
lawyers took place in Rome. One of the legal 
experts representing Nazi Germany at these 
official negotiations about how the Nazis and 
fascists would rule conquered Europe was 
Walter Hallstein. 

From June 21-25,1938, 
Hallstein represented the 
Nazi government during 
State negotiations with 
fascist Italy about the 
legal framework for a Eu- 
rope-wide dictatorship 
under the control of the 
Nazi/IG Farben Cartel 


Walter Hallstein: Prominent Nazi Lawyer - And Key Architect of the 'Brussels EU' 

Nazi/Cartel Lawyers Plan Future of Europe 

After the second meeting of these official negotiations, in the spring of 
1939, some of the results were made public: 

The 'Working Group of German-Italian Legal Relations' at its meeting in 
Vienna, March 6-11, 1939, has passed the following principles [Thesen]: 

• Each people [Volk] as a living community has to solve the race issue 
[Rassenfrage] in accordance with its spiritual and racial characteristics 
[geistig und rassischen Eigenart]. On this basis National Socialism and 
Fascism are both claiming the right to defend the European culture and 
to perfect it, 

• The legal order of the dictatorial State [Fuhrerstaat] has the task to pro- 
tect the integrity, the health and the racial health [Erbgesundheit] of 
its people. ... It is the task of National Socialism and Fascism to con- 
tinuously strengthen the racial awareness by profound spiritual and 
moral education [geistige und sittliche Erziehung]. 

• The [supreme] race has to be particularly protected from the Jewish 
race [Judentum] by eliminating it from society [Volksgemeinschaft] for 
all time in order to prevent the Jewish race from exerting any influence 
whatsoever on the life of the two nations [Germany and Italy]. 

• The universal and cosmopolitan ideologies of world conquest 
[Weltherrschaftsplanen] of the Jewish race are being opposed by the 
unequivocal principles of the German and Italian people as determined 
in the Nuremberg Laws of September 15, 1935 [Germany] and by de- 
cisions by the Fascist Great Council of October 6, 1938 [Italy]. 

Emphasis and explanations [square brackets] added. 

Thus, by Summer 1 938, Walter Hallstein had become not only a func- 
tionary of the Nazi regime participating in high-level international ne- 
gotiations between two fascist States, Germany and Italy. In fact, he 
had become a key legal and political strategist for the plans of the 
Nazi/Cartel Coalition to establish the dictatorial framework for a Eu- 
rope under the control of the Cartel. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

Hallstein - Architect of a New Europe 

The city of Rome played a spe- 
cific role in the European history 
of the 20th century. In June 
1938, this city hosted an inter- 
national conference of legal and 
political stakeholders of the Car- 
tel. Under the deceptive cover of 
a legal working group' they met 
to lay the foundation for the dic- 
tatorial framework of Europe under Cartel control. The significance of 
this 'working group' was underscored by the resolutions passed as well 
as by the list of attendees. Hallstein's group of Cartel technocrats was 
joined by some of the highest State officials - including Nazi Minister 
Hans Frank (sentenced to death for his War Crimes in 1 947) - and en- 
couraged by greetings conveyed from Hitler and Mussolini. 

In 1945, the Cartel planning for the conquest of Europe realized that 
its Nazi/Fascist military puppets had lost the war. But for the Cartel in- 
terests, this defeat was little more than a hiccup. In the Nuremberg 
War Crimes Tribunals, the Cartel's military puppets were presented to 
the world as the sole culprits. In contrast, Hallstein and the other legal 
and political experts for the Cartels's conquest plans were deceptively 
presented to an unknowing public as the democratic 'founding fathers' 
of a new Europe - with its headquarters in Brussels. 

When Hallstein left Rome after the end of the 1 938 'Conquest Con- 
ference', on June 25 of that year, he could not have known that he 
would return to this city only 1 9 years later on the same mission. 
On May 25, 1957, he signed the 'Treaties of Rome' which he had 
prepared as key legal architect. With his signature under these 
'treaties', Hallstein completed the assignment he had received in 
1938: the subjugation of Europe under the control of the Oil and 
Drug Cartel via the 'Brussels EU'. 

But let's return to 1 938. At the end of that year, something happened 
that would bring within reach the ultimate goal of the Nazi/Cartel 
coalition to control not only Europe - but also the entire world. 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

Under Control of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition 


The Oil and Drug Cartel's 
1938 Plans for Conquest and Control of Europe 

Military Conquest Plans 

Political Conquest Plans 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

The Dawn of the Nuclear Age 

The turn of the year 1 938/39 marked a turning point in human his- 
tory. For some time, the scientific race had been on for elucidating 
the structure of atoms and for releasing their giant energy forces. 
Laboratories in France, the UK, the USA, Germany and in other 
countries had been competing for years to win this race and to put 
nuclear energy to commercial and military use. 

On December 10, 1938, the Italian physicist Enrico Fermi had re- 
ceived the Nobel Prize in Physics in recognition of his pioneering 
work in this critical new scientific field - fueling the research activ- 
ities in nuclear physics and chemistry even further. 

Only one week later, on December 17, 1938, German chemist Otto 
Hahn and his associate Fritz Strassmann were conducting experi- 
ments at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Berlin, Germany. On that 
day they discovered that the bombarding of uranium atoms with 
small particles (neutrons) resulted in the split of the large uranium 
atom into two smaller atoms - releasing a vast amount of energy. 
Nuclear fission had been discovered. 

The third scientist critically involved in this research for many years, 
physicist Liese Meitner, could not be present on that day. Six months 
earlier, she had been forced to leave Germany and emigrate to 
Stockholm because of her Jewish heritage and the Nazi racial 
'blood and honor' laws. Hahn and Strassmann submitted their 
groundbreaking discovery on December 22, 1939, to the leading 
German scientific journal 'Naturwissenschaften' [Natural Sciences], 
where it was immediately published on January 6, 1939. 

During the first days of January 1939, the scientific community in 
Germany, Europe and beyond learned that the world would never 
be the same again. The discovery of nuclear fission, the release of 
unprecedented amounts of nuclear energy and its use for military 
purposes, would reshape the geopolitical face of the earth: Those 
countries controlling nuclear fission would control the world. 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

8 Weeks that Changed the Course of History 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

The Beginning of the Nuclear Age 
Was Recognized Around the World 

By early January 1 939, the scientific world had learned about the 
dawn of the nuclear age. But what about politicians, lawmakers, 
the media and the public at large? Did they realize the dramatic 
consequences that the splitting of the uranium atom would have 
upon world affairs? 

They did. Nothing illustrates this fact better than the detailed report 
about this discovery published on January 30, 1939, in the 'New 
York Times.' By that day, not even 4 weeks after the first publication 
in a scientific journal, the experimental results of Hahn's team had 
already been confirmed by Columbia University in New York and 
other research institutes. The 'New York Times' - a newspaper gen- 
erally not known for exaggerations - described the discoveries as 
"Epoch Making." 

The report leaves no doubt about the potential military significance 
of this discovery: "The splitting of the uranium atom into two parts, 
each consisting of a gigantic 'atomic cannonball' of the tremendous 
energy of 100,000,000 electron-volts, [is] the greatest amount of 
atomic energy so far liberated by man on earth." The detailed de- 
scription of the generation of two neutron 'cannon balls' from each 
split uranium atom immediately implied the principle of a chain 
reaction even to the general readership of the New York Times. 

The article correctly describes that critical steps of this research had 
been conducted by Otto Hahn and Liese Meitner at the Kaiser Wil- 
helm Institute in Berlin. What the article did not mention, however, 
was the fact that research at this private institute was largely fi- 
nanced by the IG Farben Cartel, the same corporate cartel that had 
financed the rise of the Nazis to power and was actively preparing 
the Nazi/IG Farben coalition for military world conquest. 

But the IG Farben Cartel had not only invested in the development 
of key weapon technologies in their quest to control the world. 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 


January 31, 1939 


Split It Produces 2 'Cannon- 
balls/ Each of 100,000,000 
Electron Mte 


New Process* Announced at 

Columbia, Uses Only 1-30 Volt 

tti Liberate Big Force 

Th* H]>lHt5ii£ oi a uranium R p -^ni 
IzlIq tw^ Pftrti. eaeb mmsistlne nt 
a ^ipiistLc atonic JB cauiW5nb*13 Ph «nf 
th* trtintndtUft *llflrsy tot lW h <kJO,- 
pffl electron.- vntEs, tbs treats 
ajpciinS of aUmtk energy » *« 
Ubarated by edu on e*rth R wa* 
aMaUnGtd htfTn yfribiCday by Uit 
CatUidbla UnfcveMEttf D*piTtFn*nt Q* 
Pbyjtw 3ti 4 ilatamcn! by DB*n 
Gtore* F, F*gT4ca p! tbe Columbia 

Tbn vpCltllTi^ dC the uniilaxfi 

atom, Et via said, cnnetsmtea an 

entirely B*w atoanl* ptfOC*J?i P tb* 

joB*1Mlity □! TrtLldi did Wt even 
*>0r*uf io- any pi ttie "world'a -atom 
^ii ft:-:rr.\. Tbia r«*w -Ti-ncrn, Ll ■*■:<.* 
addrf, "ylrlnii Lb* lars*** canvET- 
■Lan «f mm» JnWh «n#rcy taat bat 
y*t be«a flbtibaed by tarrciLxJal 
matbndi-. 1 " 

Small Force Tied far Splitting 

Onu d( tb* mnGt StftrtLLbiT pbfr- 
ncSfWWi, t& thin newly aJscoTB-rcd 
flUHDk prDDfiaa ii the rwLativaly 
■utaJL iimount of o&*rsy TittoiaHxy" 
to- liberate ttlfl fln&tKIOUB flTnonnUi 
AflwttorpBii thx*Uffll tb* spUHLdp 0* 
th5 TirTtnLyitl atom- lb* Uimflium 
atom Ii split hy Eieans oi ntutrDns, 
that ii. idiutra] atomic particles 
iarrjins no cJcctrjeal cTtam* Tn*aft 
neutron byi?pta Lmwl with e-Atrtf&fl 
nf dnty one-thirtieth *E a voltr Tet 
th^y prod-UN twa 5-tninic HJ fibll-0&- 
baUft' 1 of a totpl or 3DO h *00,W» #«- 
tMh-TOltfl. representLbE ill ffn*rpy 
B.dH.HlO.ODO tiPfi*i jrcatfrT". - ■ . 

It was Prrfeyaor F^rmJ wha first 
fired natron bull*** int* uranium* 
tha heaviest elEiriEiiL roisnfl fD na- 
tar*. PwfegEnr Fermi believed ha 
bad succeeded in trttting an dc- 
m-Eiit beaver than uranium, which, 
lelnc unstable, d5aLntejp:atsd into 
in isotope (twin *rf aa demmt} of 

The work vat continued at th# 
KalsEr WiLhrLn fteaearcb InEtittJlo 
Jot ChBttUtry at BEriin-DftMifiBi, 
Germany, by Dr. LJBa llcitner Vtd 

PPOr*35&r OttO Heibn, ^rhn hJLd bESD. 

worlciBj tDEftther for mjny yeaia, 
Df. il'^ltner wai diachargEd laA 
j'Htr for racial «mgw and Ehe 
TFtat tft Btochhotm, SwrsdRn. . . fc 

Excerpts from the report 
published in the New York Times on January 31, 1939 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

The Cartels' Strategic Military and 
Political Preparations for World Control 

In 1 91 8, the Cartel had lost its first attempt at world conquest -World 
War I - and its military puppet, Emperor Wilhelm II, was forced to 
abdicate. Not so, however, the corporate backers of WWI, namely, 
BAYER, BASF and HOECHST, whose merchandise - explosives and 
poison gas - had propelled this devastating war. These corporate in- 
terests, after 1 925 operating under the name of the 'IG Farben' Cartel, 
harnessed their forces for the next attempt at world conquest. 

The Cartel turned a private academic institution - named, amaz- 
ingly, after the abdicated Kaiser Wilhelm - into a training site for 
its cadres for future attempts at world conquest. IG Farben not only 
financed Otto Hahn's research at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute (KWI) 
of Chemistry, but also the buildup of an elite of legal technocrats at 
the KWI of International and Comparative Law. Behind this code 
name, the Cartel financed the strategic development of the legal 
framework needed to control and rule a subjugated world. One of 
the technocrats, specially trained there between 1927 and 1929, 
was Walter Hallstein. 

Above: Kasiser Wilhelm Institute for Chemistry in Berlin where nuclear 
fission was discovered. Right: IG Farben director Carl Bosch, who be- 
came President of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society in 1937. IG Farben fi- 
nanced the Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes for Chemistry and International 
Law - in preparation for the Cartel's next attempt at world conquest. 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

Training Elites for the Next World Conquest 

German Chemical Cartel 


Built upon the largest number of patents of any corporate group in 

the world, the German Cartel plans to conquer the global markets 

in chemicals, petrochemicals and pharmaceuticals. 

1914 -1918 World War I 

German Emperor 'Kaiser Wilhelm' and the German army are 

'commissioned' to implement these plans for world conquest. 

BAYER/BASF produce the explosives and the chemical weapons. 

The plan fails. The Kaiser has to abdicate - the Cartel continues. 

Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes (KWI) 

BAYER, BASF, HOECHST - after 1 925 operating as the IG Farben 

Cartel - finance this institution as a training site for their aca- 
demic cadres, ready for the next two attempts at world conquest. 

f y 

KWI for Chemistry 

Otto Hahn 

KWI for Inter- 
national Law 

Walter Hallstein 


Cartel rules over Europe 
and the world by: 

• Supranational State 

• Central Cartel Office 

• Corporate Dictatorship 

• Nuclear Threat 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

Hallsteins 'Conquest Speech': 

Future Europe under Nazi/IG Farben Control 

^^_ On January 23, 1939, Hallstein, then Dean of 

J" the Faculty of Law and Economics at the Uni- 

* versity of Rostock, Germany, gave a propa- 

ganda speech about the legal restructuring of 
Europe. His presentation, which may best be 
characterized as the 'Conquest Speech', was 
part of the war mobilization by the Nazi 
regime and their corporate partners, the Oil 
and Drug Cartel IG Farben. 

The timing of this speech was highly significant. Only ten months 
prior, on March 12, 1938, the Nazis had annexed Austria. On Oc- 
tober 10, 1938, - only 3 months prior to Hallstein's speech - the 
Nazis had also annexed the Czech territory of Sudetenland (Bo- 
hemia, Moravia) by threatening war if their territorial claim was not 
fulfilled. At an international conference in Munich, on September 
29/30, 1 938, Hitler had assured the world that with the annexation 
of the Sudetenland his territorial claims would be satisfied. Nothing 
could be further from the truth. 

Most importantly, the dawn of the nuclear age and their perceived 
monopoly of this technology encouraged the Nazis to accelerate 
their plans for world conquest. Hallstein's 'Conquest Speech' leaves 
no doubt that he knew about and fully supported the subjugation 
of Europe - and later the entire world - under the complete eco- 
nomic, political and judicial control of the Nazi/IG Farben coali- 
tion. In his speech, he specifically describes the planned conquest 
of Europe by the Wehrmacht and the subjugation of Europe as an 
"economic event of sheer unimaginable consequences." 

This speech, of course, reflects the dilemma the Nazis faced in Jan- 
uary 1939 - only seven months before the launch of WWII. While 
Hallstein and the other Nazi propagandists had to prepare - and 
motivate - the German elite for a full-scale world war, they could 
not yet openly talk about their war plans in public. 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

Imagine, you are part of this eery scenery more than 80 years 
ago. A cold winter night in January 1 939, freezing tempera- 
tures have taken hold of the German harbour city of Rostock 
on the edge of the Baltic Sea. Snow and ice is covering the 
roads and darkness has filled the air. 

Suddenly the silence is broken. The main roads in downtown 
Rostock seem to move, the cobble stones reverberate under 
the nailed boots of soldiers, brown shirts and Nazi State of- 
ficials. They mingled seemlessly with local politicians, uni- 
versity professors and students all dressed in formal attire, 
signifying the importance of the event. The Nazi elite is head- 
ing to one of the largest convention sites in town: 'Mahn & 
Ohlrichs Keller', the event hall of the local brewery. 

The keynote speaker for this evening is a 38 year old law pro- 
fessor from the Rostock University: Walter Hallstein. His 
speech, which you are about to read on the following pages, 
will change your perspective on the 'Brussels EU' forever. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

flRKiiMni to jmmb iMNrtUt - ftiMK Wfti to toft 

OfcfliTn a'wto Fdflb In tytatyi A OfrltrW 
firtlflt cfii KorfrMftabrify fhti, Jn &cm bit 
»f bcc Untorjltftt, tyraf, to, 9fn If fLU 
iimifMni unt r On ittiur ©wHimm)*- 
Mflwfy ttmt ti VMtomito *Bt, eifrrl 
iteiPriltrifT b« tydriri uiLlk 1 &x «■ QFC I eb tT 1 1 n n* n* 

in mtrtmffl, bet wttyi&ttotosmm, i« 
<&<flbt, in mirififyiH ititD ttt gtuhiLlnildiitK 
<JW%n, Gr ipmfl til? .usfliuinfl dirt, bflft 
Utefst WwA tajij utftmqra totrtr, ink bit 
^DcQldtuCf in If? GflfiniJttfMt tymuuicn mi* 
UlrrftrtTtttJLlS |LMtH itttyt, Mini ftl iltk Kiity 
Jtm tcm-AiMiflitityK Mfflclwi, lvemi fie flit* 
tff dtle ttlnilwwA our (lit; faiw iWWc 
«n* flllj frflbltlni jHrllflftiintH tan. ityie 
Mr to ftiibrai bjt Dsistl^ii fteflfdwlra rifi 
Xrfflci iBfftDfltfti XTAbKion lufyr, ntijt Twwijfi 

fefliK, iMft nil 1H fl^fiEU flUttllJUtflNllA ALII 
fam ttctySfyiih'lIiifl \m Vkt »tnl 111 Ibrtlt 
Hffitffwdwn ttiEflmoiintuK itftfra- 

Th jttttwir iri Ubniw, b« CHWwwiiil tor 
:ll«iilf[cii[djofl, 'flfolelfw ft, fid II II fin , 
1?: niitfi flue tornfrifluibe ffdttafl lit ton I 
iiiulriltfyu nrinfyDiULlfyn fflPdiiitiLfriB 
nltyfle £rfo|jrutt(iw nifMWtifl! for, be&aiiliriH 
tynnf blc tenii* tfiwB* foam b« WW*' 
vdltlftfim einflHEiHurn) tor Ofnitftf uirt M 
Sub n niton M, 

Tic ilf risfrilrlcitben tiuffliljiiiiianL Up tye< 
ftllw 1)i. tyMfltin WHflrc* ml' Mtoltflir Wi- 
fall btfolftL Sill WffdfW* fflrtfmttfflfllfrtn 
Idirtfc bfn tab, lluter bra «*irti*ifKii *c _ 
faiiwii flfd aiiSfl tirai UiMlimlnlfiff tt, nil I 
C-tanflKatimiiliM SUDlfliimiiPi, ier &iMb< 
BHrtltffir On*jjt £lcd, ^iwulfljbriiilttijwr 
SdUDjiKT, tin HJ(tIt(ms &f3 ftrciilrltitf, 
AittfrtyMtlfdtlMfltiUH ^tfliifr, eWBGHi 
lilbrft »{bll£il. WilfftltfflblBl $t 
Summer, M in tlltrl ri barter lir. ffletfl^ 
Lioicfr, CKritfwiimntt ban flHcf flit fit, 

Facsimile of the original newspaper report about Hallstein's presentation entitled 
'Greater Germany as Legal Entity'. This eyewitness report about the Nazi propa- 
ganda event was published in the 'Lower German Observer' ['Niederdeutscher 
Beobachter'] the next day, January 24, 1939. 

The fact that Hallstein's lecture was not just a university gathering but 
an official event of the Nazi State is underscored by the presence of 
Nazi Minister of State, Dr. Scharf - Hitler's representative in the State 
Government of Mecklenburg of which Rostock was the capital - as 
well as the entire elite of the Nazi State in this region. 

The above article in the official Nazi newspaper 'Niederdeutscher 
Beobachter' ['Low German Observer'], published the next day, January 24, 
1939, documents Hallstein's lecture and the State event surrounding it. 

The translation of this newspaper article is documented on the facing 
page. Explanations in square brackets and emphasis are added. 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

Greater Germany as Legal Entity 

Lecture evening of the University of Rostock - 
Professor Hallstein spoke 

Rostock, 24 January 

Last night a lecture evening took place 
in "Mahn & Ohlerichs Keller." Prof. 
Dr. Ruickholdt, dean of the university, 
had issued the invitation. In his open- 
ing speech, he welcomed Minister of 
[the Nazi] State Dr. Scharf, represen- 
tatives of the [Nazi] party and of its or- 
ganizations, of the Wehrmacht [Nazi 
Armed Forces], the "Reichsarbeitsdi- 
enst" [Reich Labour Service, the Nazi 
Trade Union], the city [of Rostock], as 
well as representatives of the business 
sector and the student body. 

Ruickholdt expressed the hope of the 
university that the evening may con- 
tribute to the public's trust and under- 
standing in it for, even though it is an 
old establishment looking back on a 
long history and old tradition, it is not 
far from everyday life. The Fuhrer's 
[Hitler's] great appreciation of the 
German universities as the supporters 
of a valuable tradition could be seen 
from the fact that during the "Kulturta- 
gung" [culture conference], the head- 
masters attended the Nuremberg Rally 
["Reichsparteitag"] in 1938 in their his- 
toric vestments, said Ruickholdt. 

The speaker of the evening was Dr. 
Hallstein, professor of law, who has 
gained considerable experience in 
European legal policies with his 
comparative research. He dis- 
cussed the issue of the legal link-up 
of the "Ostmark" and the Sudeten- 
land [i.e. the Nazis annexation of 
Austria and major parts of then 

Professor Dr. Hallstein's profound 
statements were received with much 
applause. A social get-together 
rounded off the evening. Apart from 
the Minister of State, the guests of ho- 
nour included, amongst others: Mayor 
Volgmann, [Nazi] garrison com- 
mander Colonel Lieb, "Generalar- 
beitsfiihrer" [third-highest rank in the 
Nazi Reich Labour Service] 
Schroeder, a representative of the 
"Kreisleiter" [head of the Nazi dis- 
trict], "Kreisorganisationsleiter" [head 
of the Nazi district organization] Deg- 
ner, "SA-Oberfuhrer" [Brown Shirt- 
Brigadier] Behnert, Chief [Nazi] 
Constable Dr. Sommer, [Nazi] Minis- 
terial Director Dr. Bergholter, [Nazi 
Wehrmacht] Lieutenant Colonel von 
Bleffingh, Warnemuende [district of 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

Hallstein and the Nazi 'Newspeak' 

Throughout this chapter, the term 'Nazi/Cartel Coalition' will be used 
to describe the horrifying 'marriage' that took place between the Oil 
and Drug Cartel IG Farben and their Nazi henchmen, who, together, 
had the goal of conquering and controlling the world. The term 
'Coalition', and even 'Marriage', was used during the Nuremberg War 
Crimes Tribunals to characterize the relationship between the Oil and 
Drug Cartel and the Nazis in preparing and launching WWII. 

Walter Hallstein's 'Conquest Speech', given on January 23, 1939, 
was part of the Nazis'/Cartel's comprehensive mobilization cam- 
paign towards World War II. 

To hide their aggressive war plans - and in order to keep the ele- 
ment of surprise - the Nazi/Cartel Coalition perfected the strategy 
of deception. Walter Hallstein was one of the 'Masters of Decep- 
tion' in the Nazi/Cartel propaganda campaign that led up to WWII. 

Now that it is made public, Hallstein's speech will become a classic 
example of how the Nazi/Cartel propagandists deceived the entire 
world about their true intentions. Hallstein's 'Conquest Speech' will 
be studied by generations of students of history, politics, law and 
other disciplines. 

Our publication of this speech does not only serve to expose the 
interests that Hallstein, as the key architect of the 'Brussels EU', 
served, it will also serve future generations as a warning to stay vig- 
ilant about the actions of their own political representatives - and 
to not fall prey to their disingenuous words. 

As part of their camouflaged mobilization for WWII, Hallstein and 
the other propagandists of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition systematically 
redefined the meaning of certain words. 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

"Dark Suit or [Nazi] Uniform" 

Even several weeks before Hallstein's lecture, the Chancellor of Ro- 
stock University left no doubt that the 'Hallstein lecture' was an 
official event organized by the university for the Nazi State. 

VIl-jDGltdiliD G" e 


ttt *JirTTi 4 Chi-t-XVlCllP bilAr, Z^\mrr*TMVT EtJDDD ^1 K dtAlP,. 
*±c;flTnC = n '^DFEZeiE &&■ ^rri. Ik.- 1 S n p p-- an ^■^■im 
. ElP VgchtS-PlrliUiT. Ot fr J r n * 1- S hi -Ul J F " 

elnnk-idon unJ. ±u ±*ei B nMtiina^.i m Mc-raT™*. nuiru- 

PC- ^--Iri^r-i AJ;..:-i.i iifcid. vin 4anr.=-.-u- , -pcm GlO 3113 ZcajI^Ant 
±4 r [SiE^t glp tJsil + EIT-HJ iO_L-5 UbT UMiqinfl 

ft«t>Jl *KilEir:fc F rli-n lO- 3-S3S . 
■5C-Z-- K m i c k. p 5 4 t . 

Jc.iji H 1 1« -Afi 

#HL 1-P- FhlllO flQb 

fPKJ=^«TUn5p BUIT/ t'Li.LAur;C=.i. 
iL-L-IJCiJ-'LQ pjr"tntpfi t-J-l lt.I. 


L ErtmptiEiL. JLi*ipLpx;«n I s 

Circular No. 1/39 

I am inviting the 'Herren Kollegen' [all Professors and assistant teaching staff 
of the university] to the Mahn & Ohlerichs Cellar, Doberaner Str. 21 on Mon- 
day, January 23, 1939, at 20:30 hours for the lecture of 'Herr Kollege Hallstein' 
on the topic of 

"The Legal Entity of Greater Germany" 

with the request to stay for the subsequent 'beer evening'. 

I am expecting the attendance of all colleagues on that evening and I would be 
grateful if you would arrive at the latest at 20:15 hours to welcome the guests 
[of the Nazi elite]. 

Seatown of Rostock, January 10, 1939. 

The Chancellor - Ruickoldt 

Dark suit or uniform [requested] 

Reply - even in case of non-attendance - 

requested on the attached card before 1/14/39 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

The following are some examples of the Nazi/Cartel propaganda 
terminology used by Hallstein - a 'Master of Deception' - through- 
out his 'Conquest Speech': 

• 'Greater Germany' ['Grossdeutschland', the code word for 
'Europe under control of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition']. Even with 
the title of his speech - 'The Legal Entity of Greater Germany' 
- Hallstein creates the deceptive impression of merely describ- 
ing legal changes within the German territory. The term 'Greater 
Germany' was the Nazi/Cartel's code word for the 'Entirety of 
Europe - and later the rest of the world - under its control.' 

• 'Ostmark' ['Eastern Territory', the Nazi/Cartel code word for 
'occupied Austria']. For annexed Austria, Hallstein uses the 
Nazi/Cartel propaganda terminology 'Ostmark' to create the 
impression that the occupation of the Austrian Nation by the 
Nazis was merely the natural extension of the German Reich 
to the East. 

• 'Anschluss' ['link-up', the Nazi/Cartel code word for 'subjuga- 
tion of a country by any means']. For the annexation of Austria 
and the Czech territories of Sudetenland (Bohemia and Moravia), 
the Nazi/Cartel Coalition had invented the term Anschluss' 
['link-up'] to imply that the annexation of these territories was 
simply an administrative 'link-up.' Hallstein uses this Nazi/Cartel 
terminology abundantly during his speech, deliberately obfus- 
cating the plans of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition to militarily conquer 
and annex all of Europe and later the rest of the world. 


'Rechtswahrer' ['Protectors of the Law', the Nazi/Cartel code 
word for the 'legal storm troopers' committed to the construc- 
tion of a totalitarian world under their control]. 1 936 - three 
years after seizing power in Germany - was the year of the 
Nuremberg Racial Laws and the year when Hallstein became 
dean of the Faculty of Law and Economics at the University of 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

a t-h c= > -a ±- 

LhK\1 tiliJfc AHt« 
fi"fc +- "hi • i E- - 1- . IS 

EXJ-?±- Z>rni^ii-ini 

2mCT> Eeh ilurdfa Ola LUu^^TC (riliii/Ln Muii -au. i^i.-., 
i n^q.jr.1^^ nJjpa™- _l^i.l VO &J LLtfvru^ LL-.D h-V-Lr. 

*r-| -*iri wLrt., 

•^4-a-ian iiLiudl: :-atJ" ^ 1± Elw E-^tpiiT. -a LAi | a, a S -fcn VQpi 

vl^if^riLfs o*r -m pf; ;■ •* j .] ■>■ r>J -±tl i^r-a c- ■ cCtj_t^e -enar n=--rci-- 

pa Lti dnrrin |. rvt+H 4. = V +■ JlT^H j*fff * ui Can .inbdUcA 
i*bt? V^Mtuli J"*3r- L-3* J.T. cnt-a a- R<iii J . ■ =1 - £-KL P4i^lLb- 
^«--"Li--L-j .Ijei. ^LKLiLLxur^^n ±44 Ja^X^tn. AALC^vaa 
:.Ol-ji^I4I-u varLrAuL 3fft KTid iJjLT.-En »iUf«IJ a c-j Jh i tt 

-CvJ^-_ -itflllf-Jafi aaJL* 4a B _-JL^r4d.nh mi 
-Lanu'ymjr^^ €**■ ES*i=i Lh-1 ii= a - n-z twJ ■_ r.-j-a £^*OLlMn£ 

Prof. Dr. jur. Walter Hallstein 

Seatown of Rostock, January 23, 1939 
StephanStr. 15 

Dear Chancellor ['Magnifizenz' was the form of address at that time] 

[Hallstein talks about himself in the third person, like a Medieval king:]... 
Tonight a scholar will take the floor on the topic of the "Legal Unity of 
Greater Germany" whose scientific work, on the one hand, was focussing on 
the comparative research of European legal systems. 

On the other hand he is, through the intensive participation in the "Academy 
of German Law" [the Nazi institution for securing the dictatorial Nazi rule 
over conquered Europe with the help of barbaric laws and decrets] particu- 
larly familiar with the legal-political goals of the [Nazi] Third Reich. 

Thus he [Hallstein still talks about himself!] seems to be called upon to make 
a statement from the position of legal science [i.e. the framework of Nazi dic- 
tatorial laws] about the melting of the new German territories with 'old Ger- 
many' [Altreich, i.e. then existing Germany]. 

Heil Hitler! 
Sincerely devoted 
to your Magnifizenz 

In his official letter to the Chancellor of the University, Hallstein describes 
himself as an expert in the 'European Legal Order' and particularly familiar 
with the 'Goals of the Third Reich': 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

1 936 was also the year when the Nazis/Cartel Coalition started 
their "4-Year-Plan" to prepare for WWII and the military con- 
quest of the world. The German lawyers were part of this prepa- 
ration. The 'Association of Nazi German Lawyers' ['Bund 
Nationalsozialistischer Deutscher Juristen (BNSDJ)'] was reor- 
ganized into the Nazi 'Rechtswahrer Bund (NSRB)' -the official 
Nazi Organization of 'Protectors of the Law.' 

The decision to organize major parts of the legal profession in 
Nazi Germany under the propaganda term 'Protectors of the 
Law' reflects the significance placed by the Nazi/IG Farben 
coalition on this profession. These 'legal stormtroopers' were 
essential for cementing the dictatorship in Germany - and later 
for extending this dictatorship to the rest of Europe. 

By branding the entire legal profession as 'Protectors of the 
[Nazi/Cartel] Law', the Nazis created one of the most impres- 
sive examples of their deceptive propaganda. These 'Protectors 
of the [Nazi/Cartel] Law' would, of course, not 'protect' the 
democratic laws. To the contrary, they were committed to sys- 
tematically destroying them. These 'Protectors of [Nazi/Cartel] 
Law' were the fanatic architects of a world under the control of 
the Nazi/ IG Farben coalition. The only laws they were sworn 
to 'protect' were the dictatorial laws cementing the rule of the 
Nazi/Cartel coalition over the world in a 'Thousand Year Reich.' 

Walter Hallstein was a member of this notorious organization 
of 'Protectors of the [Nazi/Cartel] Law'. 

These examples are merely a few from the long list of deceptive 
terms used by Hallstein and other Nazi/Cartel propagandists in 
their quest to gain control over Europe and the world. 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

*-- At tm,.t fL+t ■'■'ft- u_ 

*//-* — *■-., ,*■ "vX" 

Facsimile from Hallstein's manuscript for his Nazi propaganda speech, 
given in Rostock on January 23, 1939. The entire manuscript can be re- 
viewed on our website. 

Further information: GB2HS241 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

This Nazi/Cartel propaganda technique of reversing the facts and 
using deceptive language for propaganda purposes - perfectly ex- 
emplified by Hallstein in his 'Conquest Speech' - would 15 years 
later be described as 'Newspeak' by George Orwell in his novel 

The following translation of Hallstein's 'Conquest Speech' is based 
on his original manuscript. Considering the fanatical nature of Hall- 
stein's speech, some of the readers of this book may, no doubt, 
question the authenticity of this text. To this effect, to lay any doubts 
to rest, we have published Hallstein's entire 'Conquest Speech' on- 
line (in the original German). 

Furthermore, we were also able to obtain a handwritten copy of 
Hallstein's speech; a sample from this is documented on the previ- 
ous page. Explanations of the Nazi/Cartel propaganda terminology 
used by Hallstein throughout his extremist speech are given in the 
form of square brackets within the text or as footnotes. 

Some sequences in Hallstein's text, that merely served to mask the 
otherwise militant nature of his speech, have not been included in 
this book. They can, however, be studied online in the original Ger- 
man manuscript. 

To underscore the relevance of Hallstein's 1939 Nazi/Cartel 'Con- 
quest Speech' for present day Europe, red boxes have been intro- 
duced into the text. These red boxes mark those key parts of the 
speech that subsequently became official parts of the 'Brussels EU' 
with the signing of the 'Lisbon Enabling Act' in 2009 - exactly 70 
years after Hallstein, speaking shortly prior to the launch of WWII, 
gave the speech. 

Hallstein's 'Conquest Speech' is a perfect example of how the Oil 
and Drug Cartel exchanges its political stakeholders, but - over 
decades - continues to pursue its long-term economic and political 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

With the Nazis gone and Hallstein deceased, the same Oil and 
Drug Cartel that was responsible for two World Wars during the 
20 th Century has appointed new political stakeholders for the 21 st 

These political puppets - primarily from the Cartel's 'export em- 
pires' of Germany and France - are determined to sacrifice the peo- 
ple of our planet to the Cartel's third attempt at world conquest. 

Most of these documents could have been obtained by anyone 
interested in learning the truth about the origins of the 'Brus- 
sels EU' and the roles of its self-appointed 'founding fathers/ 
The fact that Hallstein's 'Conquest Speech' was unknown until 
the publication of this book is simply inexcusable. 

This crucial omission tells you, the reader, that either your po- 
litical leaders failed to inform themselves about Hallstein and 
the dark Nazi/IG Farben roots of the 'Brussels EU' - or, if they 
knew, they did not dare to inform you about these facts. 

Following the publication of this book, the political leaders of 
Europe can no longer hide behind the excuse that they 'did 
not know'. Now it will be up to you, the reader, to confront 
your political representatives - large and small - with the his- 
torical facts. 

We must learn from the mistakes of the past, prevent history 
from repeating itself and help build a new, democratic Europe. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

"The Legal Entity of 'Greater Germany 

The following is the text of Hallstein's 'Conquest Speech': 

"The Protector of the [Nazi/Cartel] Law 1 has three tasks: 
he has to know the Law, to apply it and to further de- 
velop it. The most important among these tasks is the 
third one, because everything we do is subjected to the 
Law of [Totalitarian] Development 2 

"We not only have to pay attention to the existing law 
but particularly to the Lawmaking for the [Nazi/Cartel] 
Future. Our Law Policy Task is not only to maintain the 
existing order but also to create a better [!] one 3 . 

"I should explain why it is the Protector of the [Nazi/Cartel] Law 1 

who has a particular calling to deal with this task. 

"The Leadership of the [Nazi/Cartel European] State 4 has the un- 
conditional and final power in all decisions relating to the archi- 
tecture of this Community of the People. 5 

Today, the 'EU Commission' has become this "Leadership of the [Euro- 
pean] State with unconditional and final power in all decisions". 

'Greater Germany', i.e. in analogy to 'Great Britain 7 and its control over major 
parts of the world through the Commonwealth at that time, the Nazi/Cartel Coali- 
tion used the terms 'Great Germany' or 'Greater Germany 7 to mark their claim for 
world dominance. The term 'Greater Germany' was used as a Code word for Eu- 
rope and later major parts of the world under Nazi/Cartel control. 

'Rechtswahrer', i.e. Nazi 'newspeak' for those fanatic Nazi/Cartel lawyers who 
were determined to destroy the democratic legal system and replace it with the 
framework of totalitarian law that formed the basis of the Nazi/Cartel dictatorship. 

'Gesetzdes Werdens', i.e. Hallstein's "newspeak" to describe the need to extend 
the totalitarian Nazi/Cartel legal system across Europe and the world. 

'Erne bessere Ordnung', i.e. with this 'better order' Hallstein describes the legal base 
for the dictatorial control of the Nazi/Cartel regime over Europe and the world. 

'Fuhrung des Staates', i.e. Nazi terminology to invoke the 'Fiihrer Principle', the 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

In 1957 (above), merely 1 8 years after his 'Conquest Speech', Hall- 
stein incorporated this 'Leadership-Principle' into the Treaties of 
Rome/ the founding documents of the 'Brussels EU'. 

The 'EU Commission' - bureaucrats appointed on behalf of the Car- 
tel - became the new dictatorial "Leadership of the [European Car- 
tel] State with unconditional and final power in all decisions 
relating to the architecture of this [European] Community"! 

In 2009 (below), 27 European political leaders passed the 'Lisbon En- 
abling Act' , thereby completing Hallstein's 'Conquest Plans' - 70 
years after his 1 939 speech - and advancing the Cartel's third attempt 
at the conquest of Europe. 

Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

"Does the Leadership of the [Nazi/Cartel ] State need lawyers to ful- 
fill this political task? The individual lawyer may wish to see it that 
way from a professional and psychological point of view, which is 
understandable. Lawyers are generally busy for their entire life, regu- 
lating and controlling the traffic of the Community inside a preserve 
tightly confined by thousands of legal paragraphs, occupied with 
daily concerns such as 'mending the fences' and 'cleaning the 

"Thus, lawyers will strongly feel the temptation deriving from the 
liberating act of [Nazi/Cartel] Law Crafting 6 , this masculine [!] chal- 
lenge that characterizes every advance into unknown territories. 
They will gratefully welcome the opportunity to either become part 
of a tremendous large-scale [Nazi/Cartel] Planning Effort 7 -or just 
take care of a modest (legal) garden left for their care. 

"However, the reasoning for the responsibility of the Protector of 
the [Nazi/Cartel] Law 1 for this architectural role 8 derives from the 
'necessities and needs' of the [Arian] Community 9 . 

"Creating this new Law Policy requires the support of those lawyers 
who command the Field of [Nazi/Cartel] Law, who know the 
[Nazi/Cartel] Legislation and the Rules of [Nazi/Cartel] Lawmak- 
ing, for it is obvious that one needs to know the 'Cood' in order to 
be able to find the Better' [!] w . 

"I am convinced, however, that the justification of this calling to 
craft New [Nazi/Cartel] Legislation has to be founded even deeper. 
I think it has to come from the very nature of the order given by the 
[Arian] People 11 to the Protector of the [Nazi/Cartel] Law 1 : 

laws upon the people of conquered European countries. 

7 'GroBartigen Gesamtplanung', i.e. Nazi/Cartel terminology for conquering and 
restructuring the European continent. 

8 'SAitgestalter', i.e. Hallstein's call to the legal profession to help construct a 
Nazi/Cartel-controlled Europe. 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

Burning Questions about Walter Hallstein: 

1 946 Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal. Front row, left to right: Goring (who was 
- together with IG Farben Cartel director Krauch - responsible for the 'Four Year 
Plans' of European conquest by the Nazi/Cartel Coalition), Hess (Hitler's 
Deputy), Ribbentrop (Foreign Minister of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition), Keitel (Chief | 
of the 'Wehrmachf) and other War Criminals. 

Question: How did Hallstein escape the Allied 'Denazification' and why was he 
not put on trial in the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals like other Nazi/Cartel 

Answer: Hallstein lied to the Allies about his affiliation with Nazi organizations. 
His 'Conquest Speech' and other incriminating documents were deliberately om- 
mitted by Hallstein in his official report to the Allies. To deceive them, he even 
presented himself as a mere 'bystander' or even 'victim' of the Nazi regime. 

* For more information on the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal against Nazi/Cartel lawyers 
(Case No. Ill of the Trials) see: 

9 'Gemeinschaft' , i.e. terminology for the Arian-based core society in Nazi/cartel- 
controlled Europe, see above. 

10 Hallstein obviously propagates the totalitarian Nazi/Cartel regime as the 'better' 
system, compared to democracy. 

yolk', i.e. Nazi terminology for the Arian people. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

"Following a law of Nature innate in the profession of the 'Protector 
of the [Nazi/Cartel] Law', he must ultimately be the responsible Ar- 
chitect of the [Nazi/Cartel] Law. 12 

"The relation between the 'Protector of [Nazi/Cartel] Law' and the 
[Nazi/Cartel] Law today is different from the 'Legal Positivism' of 
the late 19 th century that has been the prevailing opinion until the 
turn of the [20 th ] century: 

"The Creation of New [Nazi/Cartel] Law is solely the task of the 
[dictatorial Nazi/Cartel] Legislators and the role of the Judge is 
confined to the integration - the 'Submission' - of the 'Facts of 
Life' under those facts determined by [Nazi/Cartel] Law. 

In 1957, Hallstein incorporated exactly this principle - the ex- 
clusive right for the 'Creation of New [Cartel] Law' - as a mono- 
ploy of the 'New [Cartel] Legislators', the EU Commission, into 
the Treaties of Rome'. 

In 2009, 27 European politicians underwrote the 'Lisbon Treaty' 

- and thereby the key elements of an 'Enabling Act' towards the 
dictatorial empowerment of Cartel interests over Europe. With 
their signatures, these politicians - deliberately or recklessly - 
made a mockery of centuries of European democracies. 

"He tries to liberate the law from eventualities and exposes the re- 
inforcing framework of a law that ties legal consequences to a ran- 
dom event. 

"All branches of legal activity are part of the Purification[!]: 13 The 
Scientific Theory of the [Nazi/Cartel] Law / the results of which are 
being condensed to legal advice for the practice of law, and the 
daily efforts by the Front Officers [!] of the [Nazi/Cartel] Law 


12 I.e. the Nazi framework of laws subjugating the people of Europe. 

13 'Lauterungsarbeit', i.e. terminology that describes the Nazi/Cartel removal of all 
democratic elements of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition's New Order for Europe and 
the world. 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

Hallstein's Internal 'Support Team' for the 
Conquest of Europe via the 'Brussels EU' 

Konrad Adenauer, 
Chancellor of West 
Germany (left) and 
Herman Josef Abs, 
CEO of Deutsche 
Bank and Object of 
War Crimes Investiga- 

Hans Globke, Head 
of Adenauer's Chan- 
cellory, No. 101 on 
the Allied list of 'Most 
Wanted' War Crimi- 

Fritz Ter Meer, Direc- 
tor of BAYER/IG far- 
ben, sentenced to 
Prison in Nuremberg 
for his War Crimes, by 
1956 reinstated as 
Chairman of BAYER 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

who become advocates of the Insulted Consciousness [!] for the 
[Nazi/Cartel] Law 15 as well as the judge who - with a verdict - 
brings final validity to the Instructions of the [Nazi/Cartel] Law. 

"All these elements develop the [Nazi/Cartel] Law in a meticulous 
continuous effort that requires the daily Awareness of the Peoples' 
Consciousness of the [Nazi/Cartel] Law. 16 

"The true nature of the Legal Constitution of a People 11 can only 
be recognized by those observers who do not only stare at the laws 
but take into consideration the lively synergy of all these forces 1 6a 
together. This 'extensively practiced art' has to be used when a Gen- 
eral Overhaul of entire Legal Systems 17 is due that exceeds the pos- 
sibilities of daily corrections. 

"This is even more true when a Complete Overturn of a Legal Sys- 
tem of revolutionary [!] proportions 18 calls for the use of all avail- 
able forces. 

"Today we see the entirety of the 'Protectors of [Nazi /Cartel] Law' 

In 1957, Hallstein incorporated the strategic legal 'tools' for the 'Com- 
plete Overturn of the Legal Systems of revolutionary proportions' - 
across Europe - into the 'Treaties of Rome', the founding documents of 
the 'Brussels EU.' 

In 2009, 27 European political leaders enacted this 'Complete Overturn 
of Legal Systems' of European nations on behalf of the Cartel by signing 
the 'Enabling Act of Lisbon'. 

14 'Frontoffiziere des Rechts', a terminology reflecting Hallstein's submission of the 
legal profession under the general mobilization for war. Hallstein introduced this 
military terminology into the legal profession seven months before the Nazi/Cartel 
Coalition launched WWII. 

15 'Rechtsbewusstsein', Nazi/Cartel terminology for the 'insult' the legal system of 
democratic nations poses to the perception of Hallstein and other fanatical sup- 
porters of the Nazi/Cartel ideology. 

16 'Volkisches Rechtsbewusstsein', i.e. the Nazi terminology for the submission of 
the law under the dictatorial system of the Nazis and their racial ideology of a su- 
perior (Arian) 'Volk'. 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

Hallsteins External 'Support Team' for the 
Conquest of Europe via the 'Brussels EU' 


Many officials and ambassadors of 
the post- WWII West-German 
'Ministry of Foreign Affairs' had 
been members of the 'Nazi For- 
eign Ministry' under Ribbentrop. 
They were decorated agents of the 
Nazi/ Cartel Coalitions conquest 
of Europe during WWII. 

During the 1 950's - the founding 
years of the 'Brussels EU' - these 
legal and political moles became 
the Cartel's operative agents in the 
countries of Europe. They were 
commissioned to prepare the Car- 
tel's next take-over plan via the 
'Brussels EU/ . 


Carl F. Ophuels, Nazi as leading German legal patent ex- 

Rarty Member from pert including thousands of IG Far- 

1933-45, Member- ben patents. 

ship No. 2399061. A - IAAA/il . ,, ,,,,.• 

r After WWII appointed by Hallstein 

During World War II, as his right hand man and 'Ambas- 

Ophuels functioned sador of Germany in Brussels'. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

- the entire legal profession, if you want - participating in the giant 
task of the People's Renovation [!] of the Law. 19 

"The truth is that no Law comprises the full magnitude of life, and 
that every formulation of legal facts can only be an attempt to high- 
light the typical elements of a decision. Thus, as has been known 
since ancient times, the logic of the lawyer is necessarily analogous. 

"The most outstanding characteristic of today's State of the Law 
will forever [!] be the Total [Dictatorial] Policy of the [Nazi/Cartel] 
Law. 20 This means an unprecedented wide and deep revolution of 
the antiquated [democratic] legal system to its remotest corners. 

'The result of this [Nazi/Cartel] Renewal [!] 21 will characterize the 
Cultural Face of the New Era 2U [under Nazi/Cartel control]. 

In 1957, Hallstein laid the legal groundwork for the establishment of 
this 'an unprecedented wide and deep revolution of the antiquated 
(democratic, national) legal systems' in the 'Treaties of Rome', the foun- 
dation of the 'Brussels EU', thereby subjugating the people of Europe - 
"to the remotest corners" - under the rule of the Cartel. 

In 2009, by signing the 'Lisbon Enabling Act', 27 European politicians 
enacted this "Total Policy of [Cartel] Law" that threatens the subjugation 
of the people of Europe under the reign of the Cartel for generations 

19 'Volkische Rechtserneuerung', i.e. terminology of the Nazi takeover of the legal 

20 'Totale Rechtspolitik', i.e. the terminology 'total' is used by the Nazis to make con- 
tinuous reference to their political system, a 'totalitarian' state. 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

The 1951 European Coal and Steel Community: 
Building the Cartel's Dictatorship in Small Steps 

Even though the signing cere- 
mony was held on French ter- 
ritory, the treaty itself was 
largely influenced by Hall- 
stein and his legal team and it 
carries the distinct language 
of the Cartel. 

Article 9 (below) of the 'Euro- 
pean Coal and Steel Commu- 
nity' treaty creates the 
'precursor' of the 'European 
Commission' with all its dicta- 
torial characteristics. It creates 
a body that operates 'suprana- 
tionally' and explicitly 'inde- 
pendent' from democratically 
elected governments - all hall- 
marks of a dictatorial rule. 

1 8 April 1 951 : With the signing 
of the Treaty of Paris, Hallstein 
Becomes Adenauer's Envoy for 
Coal and Steel 

On April 18, 1951 the first 
'precursor' treaty of the 'Brus- 
sels EU' was signed. On 
paper, the treaty created a 
common market for coal and 
steel in central Europe. In re- 
ality, however, it was the Car- 
tel's first step towards its next 
take-over attempt of Europe. 

(Article 9 contd.J 

The members of the High Authority shall, in 
the general Interest 0* rh* Community, be completely 
independent in the performance of their duties. In 
the performance of these duties, they shall neither 
seek nor take ins true b ions from any Government or 
from any -other body. They shall refrain from any 
Action incompatible with the supranational character 
oE their duties. 

Each MEinh&r State undertakes to respect this \ 
supranational character and not to seek to influence 
the members of the High. Authority in the performance 
of their tasks . 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 


In the past, this Process was an event within conventional borders 

In 1957, 18 years after Hallstein had publicly announced the plans of 
the Nazi/Cartel Coalition for a post WWII Europe under its control, this 
political stakeholder of the Cartel got a second chance for the "Re- 
newal" of Europe that would change the "Cultural Face" of the conti- 
nent. With the Treaties of Rome', Hallstein laid the foundations of the 
'Brussels EU' under the rule of the Cartel. 

In 2009, seven decades after Hallstein's 'Conquest Speech/ 27 Euro- 
pean politicians inaugurated this "New Era" under the control of the 
Oil and Drug Cartel for millions of Europeans by signing the 'Lisbon 
Enabling Act'. 

- a type of internal affair of a small-size Germany. The Epochal 
Events 22 , however, portray this process in a completely new light. 

"All internal problems, all internal tasks are overshadowed by the 
great impact of the Link-up [of other Nations to the Nazi Reich] 23 , 
they are overwhelmed by the magnificent impulses that the 
[Nazi/Cartel] Legal Policy Work obtains from the Homecoming [!] 
of Austria and Sudetenland. 24 

"The Creation of the Greater German Reich 25 [i.e. a European 

21 'Erneuerung', i.e. Nazi 'Newspeak' for the implementation of Nazi ideology in all 
areas of society. 

21a New Era, i.e. Nazi terminology describing the control of the Nazi/IG Farben Car- 
tel over our planet in a 'Thousand Year Reich/ 

22 'Welthistorischen Ereignisse', i.e. the seizure of political power in Germany by the 
Nazi/IG Farben coalition, the annexation of Austria, the Czech Republic and the 
preparations for WWII. 

23 'Anschluss', i.e. Nazi 'newspeak' for annexation. 

24 'Heimkehr der Ostmark und des Sudentenlandes', i.e. Nazi terminology for the 
annexation of Austria and major parts of the Czech Republic. 


Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition - Blueprint for the 'Brussels EIT 

Hallstein: Key Architect behind the 
Western European Defense Community 

Hallstein was also instrumental in organ- 
izing the next 'coup' of the Cartel. 
Merely 7 years after the end of WWII and 
the military defeat of the Nazi Wehrma- 
cht, the Cartel was making plans for 
commissioning its next military troops - 
this time under the Code name 'Euro- 
pean Defence Community' (EDC). 

Hallstein was the key archi- 
tect of the EDC treaty estab- 
lishing a 'European Army' 
under the control of the 
newly formed 'High Author- 
ity' - and thereby the Cartel. 
The treaty was signed on May 
27, 1952 and ratified by Italy 
and the Benelux countries. 

On August 30, 1954, the French 
parliament derailed this plan by re- 
jecting the EDC treaty. An impor- 
tant reason was the fact that the 
highest military advisors of post- 
WWII Germany included high 
ranking Nazi generals , including 
General Hans Speidel (above: with 
Hitler in Paris, 1940; left: appoint- 
ment as a General of the newly foun- 
ded West-German Army in 1 955. 

With the 2009 'Lisbon Treaty' the 'Brussels EU' is authorized to 
build a European Army under the control of the Cartel. 55 years 
after the French Parliament rejected such a plan - the Cartel has 
reached its goal to launch a European Army under its command. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

Reich under Nazi/Cartel control] is 

• a political fact, a [Nazi/Cartel] 'Fuehrer Act' of Epochal Dimen- 
sion; 26 

In 1957, in the 'Treaties of Rome', Hallstein laid the foundations for the 
'Brussels EU' and the "Creation of a Greater Reich" under the control 
of the Cartel. 

In 2009, 27 European politicians completed this "Creation of a Euro- 
pean Reich" by signing the 'Lisbon Enabling Act' and sacrificing the 
health and life interests of millions of people to the financial interests 
of the Chemical, Oil and Drug Cartel. 

one of those [historical] Acts that change the Landscape of His- 
tory and fulfill an old Longing of the [Arian] People; 


an Economic Event of sheer unimaginable consequences; 


In 1957, Hallstein became the architect of the 'Treaties of Rome'- and 
thereby the 'European Economic Community,' (EEC). His 'Conquest 

Speech' of 1939 leaves no doubt that he served the same Cartel interests 
before and after WWII. 

In 2009, with the 'Lisbon Enabling Acf, 27 European politicians took a 
decision of "sheer unimaginable economic consequences" and delivered 
the entire European continent to a handful of multinational Cartel corpo- 
rations - including BAYER, BASF and HOECHST (today Sanofi) - who 
had previously authorized the destruction of the European continent in 
two World Wars. 

25 'Grossdeutsches Reich', i.e. Nazi term for the entirety of Europe under its control. 

26 'fine Fuhrertat von weltgeschichtlichem Rang', i.e. Hallstein's glorification of Hitler 
as divine agent of history. 

27 'Erne alte volkische Sehnsucht erfullen', i.e. Hallstein's portraying of the imminent 
military conquest of Europe by the Nazis, WWII, as an act of racially-driven destiny. 

28 'Wirtschaftliches Ceschehnis von kaum noch absehbaren Folgen', i.e. Hallstein's ref- 
erence to the economic control of Europe by the oil and drug cartel IG Farben and 
other German multinationals. 


Hallstein - Mastermind of the 'Brussels EU' 

Crafting the 'Treaties of Rome' 

From June 1 to 3, 1 955 the deci- 
sive preparatory meeting for the 
'European Economic Commu- 
nity' took place in Messina, 
Sicily with participants from 
France, Italy, Germany and the 
Benelux countries. 

With three decades of legal expe- 
rience in 'Comparative Interna- 
tional Law and Economics' and 
as a devoted servant of the Cartel, 
Hallstein was the mastermind be- 
hind this preparatory meeting for 
the 'Treaties of Rome'. 

Gaetano Martino 

Antoine Pinay 

Joseph Bech 

Willem Beyen 

Paul-Henri Spaak 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

an event of exceptional significance from the perspective of the 
the History of the Law; 29 

"The task is no longer just to renovate a dilapidated old house, 
but to construct a New Building for an Enlarged Family on an Ex 
tended Territory [of conquered nations] 



In 1957, with the 'Treaties of Rome' Hallstein became the chief archi- 
tect for the "New Building", i.e. the 'Central Cartel Office' of the 'Brus- 
sels EU'"foran Enlarged Family", i.e. billions of Europeans living today 
and in future generations, "on an Extended Territory", i.e. more than 
two dozens of European nations. 

In 2009, with the 'Lisbon Enabling Act' 27 European politicians fell prey 
to the deceptive rethoric of Cartel stakeholders that their people would 
be better off to leave their "delipidated old [national] houses" because 
they were built on democratic foundations and move into a "New Build- 
ing" - the 'Brussels EU' - under the centralized dictatorial yoke of the 
Oil and Drug Cartel. 

''The question will be: Is it really necessary to erect just one building? 

"This brings us right to the first problem of legal policy caused by 
the territorial annexations: Why should one single legal system form 
the basis of a Greater [Nazi/Cartel Europe-wide] Germany? 32 . . . 

29 'Ein rechtsgeschichtliches Ereignis von auBerordentlicher Bedeutung', i.e. Hallstein's 
description of his own role as a lawyer in a future Europe under Nazi/IG Farben con- 

30 'Das baufallig gewordene alte Haus' t i.e. Hallstein's and the Nazis' characterization 
of a democratic Europe. 

31 'Auf erweitertem Grunde ein neues Gebaude fur die groBer gewordene Familie zu 
errichten', i.e. Hallstein's remarkable portrait for the imminent death of 60 million 
people, the devastation of Europe during WWII, and a future Europe under the con- 
trol of the Nazi/IG Farben coalition. 

32 'Warum soil ein Recht in Groftdeutschland gelten' i.e. Hallstein asks this rhetorical 
question to legitimize the extension of the German Nazi laws to all future countries 
occupied by the Wehrmacht. 


Hallstein - Mastermind of the 'Brussels EU' 

Creating 'EURATOM' 

The most important mili- 
tary reason why the Car- 
tel's WWII attempt at the 
conquest of Europe failed 
was the fact that the 
Nazi/Cartel Coalition lost 
the race for the nuclear 
bomb, even though they 
had been leading the de- 
velopment of its key 
components, i.e. nuclear 
fission (top left: Hahn) 
and rocket technology 
(top right: v. Braun with 
Nazi officers) and had 
developed medium- 
range missiles (right: V1 
Rockets found by US 
Army in Germany). 

With the foundation of the 'Euro- 
pean Atomic Energy Commission' 
(EURATOM) as part of the Treaties 
of Rome', the Cartel 'corrected' 
this deficit. Hallstein and his right 
hand Ophuels orchestrated this 
coup through a so-called 'Inter- 
governmental Conference' (right: 
session of January 28, 1957, with 
Hallstein in the center). 

With EURATOM and the signing 
of the 'Treaties of Rome', the cor- 
porate accomplices of the former 
Nazi/Cartel coalition had gained 
direct access to nuclear technol- 
ogy through its politburo, the 
'EU Commission' in Brussels. In 
1957, the Cartel was ready to 
launch its next attempt at world 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

"There can be no doubt today about the necessity for a Unified 
Legal System. 33 

In 1957, with the 'Treaties of Rome', Hallstein laid the foundation for 
this "Unified Legal System" - the 'Brussels EU' - with its political ex- 
ecutive, the so-called 'EU Commission', operating beyond and outside 
any democratic control. 

In 2009, with the 'Lisbon Enabling Act' 27 European politicians put their 
signatures under a plan that originated from the drawing boards of the 
Nazi/Cartel coalition. Hallsteins 1939 speech, documented here, leaves 
no doubt and constitutes sobering testimony to that effect. 

"The failure to put this law into action is one of the unfinished tasks 
and failures of the Second German Reich. 34 

"The affirmation arises not only from material convenience. This 
Greater Germany [i.e.European continent] is increasingly becom- 
ing one single economic entity. 35 

33 'Notwendigkeit der Rechtseinheit', i.e. German Nazi laws must be extended to all 
conquered countries in Europe and the world. 

34 The term 'Second Reich', ('Zweites Reich') - as opposed to the Nazis Third Reich 
('Drittes Reich') - describes the epoch of German Kaisers Wilhelm I, Frederick III 
and Wilhelm II (the period from 1871 to 1918) that culminated in World War I, the 
first German attempt to conquer Europe and the rest of the world. Hallstein advo- 
cates that the Nazis and the corporate interests they represent should finish with 
WWII what they could not achieve during World War One! 

35 Since Germany was already an economic entity, this sentence once again reflects 
the heinous nature of Hallstein's propaganda speech. The term 'Greater Germany' 
('Grossdeutschland') is the Nazi code language for the 'entirety of Europe - and later 
the World - under the control of the Nazis and the Oil and Drug Cartel'. 


The Architects of Auschwitz support the 'Brussels EU' 

War Criminal as Chairman of BAYER 

1956 was the year when the 
'Intergovernmental Confer- 
ence' preparing the 'Treaties of 
Rome' was launched. The 
same year, Fritz Ter Meer, the 
former BAYER/IG Farben Di- 
rector who had been sen- 
tenced in Nuremberg to nine 
years in prison for the enslave- 
ment of European citizens and 
the robbery of Europe compa- 
nies, was appointed Chairman 
of BAYER -again. 


[^— T^TpT-- — 


The motives for the massive support of 
the 'Brussels EU' by BAYER and the 
other IG Farben companies were ob- 
vious: As the world's largest patent 
holding group in the field of chemi- 
cals and pharmaceuticals, they would 
essentially control Europe through 
their new politburo, the 'Brussels EU'. 


17 years after Hallstein's 'Conquest 

Speech' on behalf of the Cartel - and 

8 years after his Cartel boss Ter Meer had been sent to prison for 

his war crimes - the 'Hallstein/Ter Meer Team' was united again 

behind the Cartel's next attempt at the conquest of Europe. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

"Therefore it is obviously not acceptable that the [Nazi/Cartel dic- 
tatorial ] Legal System - that represents the blood circulation of 
this Body 36 - is being strangulated [!] by the diversity of [democ- 
ratioc] legal systems in its different parts 

In 1957, with the 'Treaties of Rome', Hallstein laid the foundation to 
end the "strangulating effect" of democratic legal systems in Europe 
which impeded the Cartel's plan at the conquest of Europe and the 
World. By designing a dictatorial legal system - without any real sepa- 
ration of constitutional powers - Hallstein made sure that the "legal 
"blood circulation" of the Cartel's rule over Europe will no longer be 
blocked by the democratic will of the people. 

In 2009, with the 'Lisbon Enabling Act' 27 European politicians cleared 
the last blockages obstructing the Cartels' "blood circulation" towards the 
dictatorial take-over of Europe. 

"A People 11 are not only formed by common physical conditions, 
i.e. inherited and external factors. Neither are they formed by the 
common fate of history alone. A People are primarily shaped by 
common convictions and values. 


'Thus, the [Nazi/Cartel] Leadership of a [Arian] Peoples f State 
in particular National Socialism, can not do without the tools of 
law in order to secure this common ground. 

I.e. Europe under Nazi control. 

'Volkischer Staat', i.e. Hallstein's racial term for the superiority of the Arian state. 


Hallstein - Mastermind of the 'Brussels EU' 

Signing the 1957 'Treaties of Rome' 

On March 25, 1957, 
Hallstein completed 
the first stage of the 
Cartels' assignment: 
The former crusader 
of the military con- 
quest of Europe by the 
Nazi/Cartel Coalition 
was one of only 
twelve signatories of 
the Treaties of Rome', 
which created the 
'European Economic Community' and EURATOM. 

By signing these treaties 
Hallstein (together with 
German Chancellor Ade- 
nauer, picture at left) had 
created the launching pad 
for the Cartel's next attempt 
at the conquest of Europe, 
by political pressure, eco- 
nomic bribery - and by 
EURATOM. From the in- 
ception, the Cartel's plan 

was to create the political - and ultimately military - base for its 

21 st Century control of the world. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

"The law is the most outstanding means of education 38 at the dis- 
posal of a community, for there are few things, the authoritative na- 
ture of which are so deeply based in the human heart as the belief 
in Law and Truth[!]. 39 

"Since we now answered the question of "if" a uniform legal system 
is needed, we now can turn to the question of "what" such a system 
must look like, which is even more difficult 

"The Link-Up 23 [Annexation of Austria] is initially a process of 
[Nazi/Cartel] State Law. This process integrates the Territory and 
the People of the newly linked [annexed] state, creating a New Na- 
tionality [!] for the people. 

In 1957, with the 'Treaties of Rome', Hallstein laid the foundation for 
the Cartel's next attempt at the conquest of Europe. In his 1 939 speech 
Hallstein described the mechanisms of dictatorial annexation of Austria 
on behalf of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition. With the Treaties of Rome' the 
annexation of Austria in 1938 was no longer an example from history. 
With these Treaties', the complete take-over of entire societies, would 
not be the excepotion - but the rule for all nations of Europe. The people 
of Europe would be forced to accept a "New Nationality" - that of 
servile subjects to 'Cartel ruled Europe'. 

In 2009, with the 'Lisbon Enabling Act' 27 European politicians imposed 
this "New Nationality" on hundreds of millions of their people -without 
even allowing a referendum to ask for their approval. 

38 'Erziehungsmittel', i.e. the term 'education' in German also comprises the meaning 
of discipline/ Thus, Hallstein's term here is purposefully chosen to camouflage the 
disciplinary function of the law in the totalitarian Nazi State. 

39 'Glaube an Rechtund Wahrheit', i.e. once again Hallstein's Nazi propaganda termi- 
nology deceptively camouflages the horror of reality: the law and the truth are the 
first values sacrificed by the totalitarian Nazi regime. 


Hallstein - Mastermind of the 'Brussels EU' 

Choosing Brussels as the Cartel's Politburo Seat 



■3*r iun)pjild}ilb 5#p#in»aJiA2'*yTL uoX Am Laiar#rrfl«ii c"h*l-t-"¥i *u **fii»ri - 

^M&iuLhj Lb illablli-t nf dit fltut«fc#ai WHgllErilcaitflii 

duj-f Lafa Iliiwtt 

«} in lniaa*i alo- Uuilonniif tar altsfrikf* ■ana fHtgibilUn, 4a 
din BalfrlnV 6db»* ■■!• fllc*rwii A"#n*Cnrtl"Un*Gh#n VirtJilAttti *Ur4*n. 

d) El* IttllfMr PlUf-»A m&pf ftmi*ii **rd*a, fi* - 4ju lit nacfa D..aht slsnu- 
D*tL«i. linb»r h»l»n ll# ilflaJLinhJ kntasorLiuli aritUfcirt, Ahb sin pIoH nit 

After crafting the Treaties of 
Rome' the next Cartel assign- 
ment for Hallstein was to imple- 
ment these treaties from the 
position of 'chief of the new 
'Central Cartel Office'. 

On December 30, 1957- from 
the vacation resort Alpbach in 
the Tirolian Alps - Hallstein 
wrote a three page dossier to 
German chancellor Adenauer. 

This letter - that should become 
known as the 'Brussels Final So- 
lution' - describes in detail the 
Cartel's 'horsetrading' plans to 
secure the highest office in the 
'New Europe' for Hallstein him- 
self: the role as first President of 
the 'EU Commission' as 'chief 
of the Cartel's politburo. 

Highlights of this 'Brussels Final 
Solution Letter' are: 

• "We have to insist on 'Brus- 
sels' as the "final solution of 
the location question" [note 
Hallsteins analogy to the 
Nazi propaganda of 'final so- 
lution of the Jewish question'] 

• "The Italians have to be com- 
pensated [for not having the 
seat in Rome]. How, we have 
to see". 

• "The thought of having the 
seat in Paris emerged - but 
was dropped after our [Hall- 
stein's] fierce intervention". 

• "The tasks at hand [as head of 

the 'EU Commission'] are tai- 
lor-made for a German[!]". 

• "After 7 years of waitng [a 
German head] is overdue". 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

"Moreover, this process subjugates the People and the Territories 
[of the conquered/annexed State] to the Sovereignty of the Mother 
[Nazi/Cartel] State with its defined Legislative and Executive Con- 
stitutional Powers. 40 

In 2009, with the 'Lisbon Enabling Act' the "People and the Territories" 

of 27 European nations were subjugated to the "Sovereignity of the 
Mother State" - the Brussels EU' - with its "Legislative and Executive 
Constitutional Powers" defined by Hallstein in the 1957 'Treaties of 

Rome / - and publicly trumpeted by the Nazi/Cartel legal camarilla al- 
ready in this 1939 speech. 

"In other legal areas, the Link-Up 23 leaves the existing legal order 
intact In all the Unified [European] Territories 41 , the old legal sys- 
tem continues - except, of course, where this contradicts the Con- 
stitution of the Unified [European] State/ 


In his 1939 'Conquest Speech', Hallstein uses the same deceptive lan- 
guage by which most of the European nations have been bribed and 
coerced by the political stakeholders of the Cartel in Brussels - and its 
puppets inside the European countries - into joining the 'Brussels' EU. 

With the false promise that the 'Brussels EU' would merely be a loose 
association of European States to promote economic growth, democ- 
racy and peace, the 'Brussels EU octopus swallowed nation after nation 

across Europe. 

Millions of people across Europe will now find their growing suspicions 
against the 'Brussels EU' confirmed. The facts documented in this book 
will help them to free themselves from the 'Brussels Octopus' to pro- 
tect and preserve freedom and democracy for future generations. 

'Gesetzgebende wie vollziehende Gewalt (die) sich aus dessen Verfassung ergibt', i.e. 
Hallstein creates the illusion of the Nazi state as a democratic constitution with sepa- 
rate legislative and executive powers. Here, too, the exact opposite was true: The 
Nazis' 'Enabling Act of 1933' and the following 6 years of systematic build-up of a to- 
talitarian legal system had deliberately abolished any separation between the legisla- 
tive and executive powers. Hallstein was one of the architects of this totalitarian legal 
system. It underscores his unscrupulous nature as a Nazi propagandist that in this 


Hallstein - Mastermind of the 'Brussels EU' 

Appointed Chief of the First 'EU Commission' 

Only eight days after his convincing self-pro- 
motion, Hallstein's 'horse-trading 7 payed 
out: On January 7, 1 958, he was appointed 
Chief of the first 'EU Commission' in the 
close circle of six foreign ministers. 

On that day Hallstein had successfully com- 
pleted the second assignment of the Cartel: 
to coordinate its next attempt at the con- 
quest of Europe from the position of Chief of 
its newly formed politburo. 

speech he refers to separate executive and legislative powers and even constitutional 
rights in the Nazi 'motherland' - knowing very well that they don't exist 

41 'Vereinigte Gebiete', i.e. with this remarkable terminology Hallstein describes a world 
under Nazi control as one 'united territory' - unified by Nazi tanks and Nazi law. 

42 'Soweit sie der Verfassung des Gesamtstaates zuwiderlaufen', i.e. another example 
of the deceptive nature of Hallstein's speech. This wording implies that the legal sys- 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

"Thus, for the Greater German Reich 25 , a Common Legal System is 

not a fact that automatically results from the creation of this (future) 
Reich 43 , but it is a task. 

"A naive observer of this situation could think that nothing is easier 
to accomplish than this task. Such a person could think that one 
needs only one Instruction [Worschrift'J, namely that all laws of the 
Old Reich [Nazi Germany] would immediately be applicable to 
Austria [Ostmark] and the Sudetenland. 44 But the task at hand is 
not that simple 

"It is impossible to impose over such a Territory at once the entire 
Sum of our Written [Nazi/Cartel] Laws. Such a strategy would al- 
ready fail due to the sheer limitations of the mental capacity 45 of 

those people who are to apply these laws. 

What Hallstein calls for here is the element of strategic deception in pur- 
suing the Cartel's goals of conquering Europe and the world. The main 
reason for his caution are not the "limitations of the mental 
capacity'" [note Hallstein's arrogant language] of the legal professionals 
in the annexed countries. The real danger for the success of the Cartel's 
strategy lies in the "Personality of the People" of the subjugated countries 
- i.e. their opposition to succomb to the dictatorial rule of the Cartel. 

The fact that the stakeholders of the 'Brussels EU' in the 21st Century 
had to deny more than 99% of the people of Europe the right to vote 
on the so-called 'Lisbon Treaty' speaks for itself. It shows that Hallstein's 
fears of the intelligence and the democratic "Personality of the People" 
still bears relevance today. 

tern of the occupied territory continues unless it contradicts the legal system of Nazi 
Germany. Hallstein knew that there would be nothing left from democratic consti- 
tutions anywhere in the world, once the Nazis had subjected them to their totali- 
tarian rule. In this sentence Hallstein is also using another term that reveals the Nazis' 
plans for a conquered Europe and the plan for a new world order: 'Gesamtstaat', i.e. 
terminology for the 'Unified European State' - today's Brussels EU - and later the 
New World Order under the control of the same interests. 


Hallstein - Mastermind of the 'Brussels EU' 

Brussels 'Atomium' - Claim of Global Control 

The 'Lisbon Enabling Act' calls for 
the build-up of a European Army 
- including nuclear weapons - 
under the control of the Cartel's 
politburo, the 'EU Commission'. 
With this 2009 Act, the Atomium 
symbol has visibly obtained a 
new meaning: The claim to global 
control by the 'Brussels EU'. With 
its current plans to build new 'EU 
Commission' buildings "in view 
of the Atomium" the Cartel leaves 
no doubts about its intentions. 

Fittingly to the advent of this 
new political construct - the 
'Brussels EU' - the 1958 
'World Fair' took place in that 

The symbol of this 'World 
Fair' - and the hallmark of 
Brussels ever since - became 
the Atomium building. The 
construction of this giant mag- 
nification of an atom was in- 
tended to symbolize the pride 
of mankind of having 'tamed' 
nuclear energy for peaceful 
purposes - and as a claim to 
world power. 

13 'Schaffung dieses Reiches', i.e. the establishment of one Nazi Reich across Europe. 

u Hallstein carefully omits here to include all the other countries yet to be conquered. 

15 'Grenzen der Geisteskraft', i.e. Hallstein's ambiguous formulation that the lawyers 
in occupied countries have limited mental capabilities - compared to 'Arian' lawyers 
like Hallstein; this sequence in Hallstein's text reveals his support for the fanatic Nazi 
ideology of (Arian) 'Ubermenschen' and 'Untermenschen' in the occupied countries. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

"Such an attempt would also fail due to the complexity of the struc- 
ture [Verwickeltheit des Gefuges'] of a Modern Social Order. 46 

One cannot simply change a Legal System like a dress that has be- 
come unfashionable because every fundamental change also 
touches - so to speak - the Personality ['Personlichkeit'] of a People. 

"I am now coming to the concrete questions of the Adjustment of 
[Nazi/Cartel] Law. 47 One has to distinguish between certain Norms, 
the introduction of which cannot be delayed; they represent a cer- 
tain Emergency Program ['Sofortprogramm'] within the Legal Uni- 
fication Process. 48 

In 1957, in the 'Treaties of Rome', Hallstein enshrined these "Emer- 
gency Programs within the Legal Unification Process" as the basis of 
the 'Brussels EU' - most notably by creating the so-called 'EU Commis- 
sion' as an 'Executive Organ of the Brussels EU/ 

The 'EU Commission', this unique construct- unprecedented in the his- 
tory of democratic constitutions - was copied from the drawing boards 
of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition that planned to rule post-WWII Europe 
under a dictatorial "Central Cartel Office". 

In 2009, 27 European politicians- without asking the approval of their 
constituents - signed the 'Lisbon Enabling Act' and approved the Cartel's 
"Emergency Programs within the Legal Unification Process" including 
an unelectable "Central Cartel Office" that- like in feudal regimes of 
Medieval Times - holds the monopoly of initiating the laws for Europe 
outside any democratic control. 

46 'SAodeme soziale Ordnung', i.e. Hallstein does not hesitate to describe the totali- 
tarian Nazi regime as a 'modern social order'. 

47 'Rechtsangleichung', i.e. Nazi 'newspeak' for overthrowing the existing legal system 
and imposing the totalitarian Nazi laws. 

48 'Rechtsvereinheitlichung', i.e. another Nazi term to skate around the imposition of 
totalitarian Nazi law. 


Hallstein - Mastermind of the 'Brussels EU' 

German Cartel Gets Access to Nuclear Technology 

On January 1, 1959, 

the 'EU Commission officially established a 

"common market for nuclear materials" 

through EURATOM. 

Thus, only one year 

after the Nazi/Cartel crusader Hallstein 

was appointed Chief of the Cartel's politburo 

- and 1 4 years after 1 945 - 

he had accomplished his third assignment: 

Access of the German Cartel interests 

to nuclear (arms) technology. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

"On the other hand there are those (laws) that have to be crafted 
first, since in the legal field there are no inventions but only discov- 
eries. These laws have to be crafted under the participation of the 
'Protectors of the [Nazi/Cartel] Law' in the Eastern Territories/ 9 who 
can make some [!] contributions towards the Purification ['lautern'] 
of our Legal System and towards making it a True [Nazi/Cartel] Law 
of the German People. 

"The 'Legal Emergency Program ', the immediate goals, are in fact 
the introduction of the laws already in use in the Old Reich. 50 

"The Legal Process to introduce these [Nazi/Cartel] Laws is the Di- 
rective. 51 The Competence [to issue these Directivesf lies with the 
Officials of the [Nazi/Cartel European] Reich ['Reichsminister'] to- 
gether with the [Nazi] Ministry of the Interior. 

Hallstein incorporated all these elements in the 'Treaties of Rome' as 
the founding principles of the 'Brussels EU' rule over Europe today: 

• The "Officials of the [European Cartel] Reich" in Hallsteins 'Con- 

» quest Speech' became the 'EU Commissioners', who rule Europe 
on behalf of the Cartel and beyond any democratic control. 

• The "Directives" from the Nazi/Cartel drawing board became the 

I"EU Directives" of today. These "EU Directives", together with so- 
called "EU-Regulations", became the dictatorial orders by which 
the Cartel's politburo, the 'EU Commission', decides the laws for 
500 million people of Europe - essentially outside of any democratic 

49 "Ostmarken', i.e. Hallstein uses here the plural of Ostmark', implying that after the 
annexation of Austria he foresees many new territories in the east being conquered; 
with the attack on Poland and Eastern Europe little more than half a year later, Hall- 
stein's outline here should become bloody reality. 

50 'Altrelch', i.e. Nazi Germany. 


Hallstein - Mastermind of the 'Brussels EU' 

Tradition of Symbols 

As a reward for completing the 
Cartel's assignments during his 
first five-year term as politburo 
Chief, the Cartel stakeholders 
commissioned the 'new king of 
Europe' an appropriate 'castle' 
and a 'royal staff of several 
thousand servile bureaucrats. 

Construction of the Berlaymont 
building - which, even today, 
remain the headquarters of the 

'EU Commission - began in 
1 963 and marked the beginning 
of Hallstein's second five-year 
term as its Chief. When looking 
at the blueprints of his future 
castle, Hallstein must have been 
overcome with joy: The shape 
of the 'EU Commission' head- 
quarters strikingly resembled 
the emblem on the badge he 
wore with pride for many years 
only two decades previously. 

'Verordnung', i.e. the dictatorial execution of the Nazi laws in the occupied coun- 
tries; it is a bizarre irony of history that less than two decades after Nazi propagandist 
Hallstein would present these undemocratic mechanisms as a tool to control Europe 
under the Nazi / IG Farben coalition; he would - as president of the EU Commission 
- introduce the very same 'directives' and 'regulations' as tools via which the suc- 
cessors of IG Farben could rule Europe under the 'Brussels EU'. The 'Lisbon Treaty' 
that went into effect on December 1, 2009, made Hallstein's key visions a reality. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

"Among the subjects of this Rapid Alignment [of the Nazi/Cartel 
Law[ we can differentiate between two groups: The first group com- 
prises the Directives concerning the Constitutional Law,, which con- 
stitute the National Socialist State and define its shape and reality. 

"These Directives were already introduced in Austria a few days 
after the [Nazi/Cartel] Unification Law. 52 

"Among them are: 

The State Constitutional Laws against the set- 
ting up of new political parties [in a Europe 
under Nazi/cartel control] 53 

State Constitutional Laws to secure the Unity 
between the [European Nazi/Cartel] State and 
the [Nazi/Cartel] Party 5 


State Constitutional Laws for the New Con- 
struction of the [European Nazi/Cartel] 
Reich 55 

State Constitutional Laws about Governors of 
the [European Nazi/Cartel] Reich 5 


Certain Legal Complexes connected to these Constitutional 
Laws, including the Reich Citizens Law [Reichsburgergesetz], 

52 'Vereinigungsgesetz', i.e. the Nazi imposed law that should give the annexation of 
Austria a pseudo-legal basis. 

53 'Staatsgrundgesetze gegen die Neubildung von Parteien', i.e. as one of the first acts 
after seizing power in Germany, the Nazis banned the setting up of new political 
parties; this law was considered by Hallstein so important that it had to be intro- 
duced as soon as possible in any country taken over by the Nazis - and this is the 
same man who later shaped the 'Brussels EU'. 


Hallstein - Mastermind of the 'Brussels EU' 
Tradition of Promoting Cartel Dictatorships 

From 1933 to 1945 

on behalf of the 
Nazi/Cartel Coalition 

From 1958 to 1967 

as the first President of 

the 'EU Commission' 

Appointed by the Cartel 

In 1939, Hallstein publicly advocated the build-up of the Nazi/car- 
tel dictatorship across Europe - including the ban of other political 
parties and other characteristics of a totalitarian regime. 

Less than two decades later, this crusader for a corporate European 
dictatorship became the chief architect of the 'Brussels EU/ 

In 1957, the same man was appointed by the Cartel as the first 
president of its new politburo, the 'EU Commission'. 

To deceive the public, the military stakeholders of the Cartel had 
been exchanged after 1 945, but the Oil and Drug Cartel positioned 
its key political and legal technocrats in pole positions for its next 
attempt at the conquest of Europe. 

54 critical law for establishing the Nazi dictatorship in any country. 

55 'Neuaufbau', i.e. transformation of democracy into dictatorship. 

56 'Reichstatthaltergesetz', paragraph 1 of this law states: 'The Reich governor is the 
representative of the Reich government in his territory. His task is to make sure that 
the political orders issued by the Fuehrer and Chancellor of the Reich (Hitler) are 
being followed' ('Er hat die Aufgabe, fur die Beobachtung der vom Fuhrer und Re- 
ichskanzler aufgestellten Richtlinien der Politik zu sorgen') 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

In 1957, Hallstein designed these "State Constitutional Laws for the New 
Construction of the [European Cartel] Reich" in the Treaties of Rome.' 

More than 5 decades later, 27 political leaders of Europe - without ex- 
posing the evil historical origin of the 'Brussels EU' to their constituency 
- signed the 'Lisbon enabling Act' and thereby the "Constitutional Law 
for the New Construction of the [European Cartel] Reich." 

the Reich Flag Law [Reichsflaggengesetz], directives about the 
National Markings [Hoheitszeichen], National Seal [Re- 
ich ssiegel] and the National Symbols [i.e. Nazi swastika]. 

"The second group of immediate laws / which are ex- 
panding daily, comprises the Directives concerning 
the Build-up of [Nazi/Cartel] State Organizations, 
Material Rights or Proceedings about which the Na- 
tional Socialist Law Maker 57 has already cast its ver- 
dict [note the supremacist language!] - either by 
maintaining Existing [Nazi/Cartel] Legal Conditions 
or by Creating New Ones. 

'These Directives are 'Causa ludicata' ['passed Acts'], 
i.e. they have entered from the State of Law Policy 
['Rechtspolitik'] into the State of Existing [Nazi/Car- 
tel] Order ['gel ten den Ordnung']. 

"These laws require no further deliberations [!]. 

"The most important [Nazi/Cartel] Acts in this cate- 
gory that were immediately introduced [in annexed 
Austria and other occupied countries] were: 

'Nationalsozialistische Gesetzgeber', i.e. the Hitler government. 


Hallstein - Mastermind of the 'Brussels EU' 

Architect of 21 st Century Cartel Dictatorship 



'Conquest Speech' 



Rome Treaties' 

When reading the adjacent paragraphs the obvious question arises: 

• How could the political leaders of 27 European nations sign the 
'Lisbon Enabling Act 7 and approve a political plattform of which the 
key architect had been - on public record - an outspoken advocate 
of political and corporate dictatorship? 

• How can millions of intelligent people from across the European 
continent - a continent that claims to be the cradle of democracy - 
give away control over the destiny of their continent to a cast of 
politicians who were unable or unwilling to protect the century- 
old achievements of democracy for which so many people had sac- 
rificed their lives? 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

The Law for the Protection of the German 
Blood and the German Honor; 58 

The setting up of the Administrative Organiza- 
tions of the [European Nazi/Cartel] Reich ['re- 
ichseigene Verwaltungen'] ; 

a) The Financial Administration ['Finanzver- 
waltung'] as one of the first measures; 

b) The Judicial Administration ['Justizverwal- 

c) The Railway and Postal Service Admin- 
istration ['Eisenbahn- und Postverwal- 

d) The Air Traffic Administration ['Luft- 

e) The Offices of the Propaganda Ministry 

['die Behorden des Propaganda Minis- 
ter i urns']; 

"The Military Laws ['Wehrrecht'] and the Laws about the [Eu- 
ropean Nazi/Cartel] Reich Work Service 59 and the Law about 
Air Defence; 

58 'Gesetz zum Schutze des deutschen Mutes', this is no misprinting, Hallstein who 
would later become the founding father of the 'Brussels EU' advocates as a top pri- 
ority the imposition of the Nuremberg Racial Laws in the occupied countries. 

59 'Reichsarbeitsdienst', starting in 1935, the Nazis introduced a six month compulsory 
service prior to the military service that served as the ideological and physical prepa- 
ration of every male German for war. 


Hallstein - Mastermind of the 'Brussels EU' 

Architect of 21st Century Cartel Dictatorship 





In 1957, the Arian racist Walter Hallstein, a staunch crusader for the 
military subjugation of Europe under dictatorial rule of the Nazi/Cartel 
Coalition, was allowed to become the key architect and first 'President' 
of Europe. The people of Europe - then - were prevented from learning 
who this key architect for the 'Brussels EU' was. 

After the publication of this book, no politician who signed the 'Lisbon 
Enabling Act', no political party sitting in the so-called 'European Par- 
liament' - a fig leaf for the corporate dictatorship of the 'Brussels EU' 
- no one across Europe can say any longer: 'We did not know.' 

There can be only one conclusion: European politicians and political 
parties that continue to support the dictatorial construct of the 'Brus- 
sels EU' - despite this devastating historical evidence - have to be 
voted out of office by millions of people and replaced with represen 
tatives who are determined to protect democracy. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

From the Administrative Laws ['Verwaltungsrecht']: the Reich 
Community Administrative Law ['Reichsgemeindeordnung'], 
the Law for Reunion 60 , part of the Civil Servant Law 61 and part 
of the Law Relating to the Public Service Salary Regulations 

['Besoldungsrech t ']; 

Important Taxes; 

From the Laws Regulating Professional Organizations ['standis- 
ches Recht'J: the Law Regulating the Chamber of Culture [ y Kul- 

turkammergesetzgebung'], the Veterinary Law ['Tierarzte- 

From the Farming Law ['Bauernrecht']: the Farm Estate Inheri- 
tance Law ['Erbhofgesetz'], the Food Supply Law ['Nahrstands- 
gesetz'], the Regulations for Marketing of Agricultural Products 

['landwirtschaftliche Marktordnung']; 

From the Social Law ['Sozialrecht']: the [Nazi/Cartel] Reich In- 
surance Regulations ['Reichsversicherungs-Ordnung'] and the 
Social Welfare Regulations rfursorgerechtliche Vorschriften']; 

From the Employment Laws ['Arbeitsrecht']: step by step the 
Law Regulating National Work Service ['Gesetz zur Ordnung 
der nationalen Arbeit']. 

60 'Sammlungsgesetz', a 1934 Nazi law from as early as 1934 that essentially eliminates 
the right for any independent public reunion by requiring official approval by the 
Nazi authorities for all such reunions. 

61 'Beamtengesetz', one of the first Nazi laws from April 7, 1933, - only two weeks after 
the Nazis' infamous 'Enabling Act' (Ermachtigungsgesetz) - excluding from public 
service all persons of Jewish descent, all persons opposed to the Nazi regime and 
all those persons 'that are not at all times and unsparingly ready to defend the na- 
tional state' ('Personen, die nicht jederzeit riickhaltlos fur den nationalen Staat ein- 


Hallstein - Mastermind of the 'Brussels EU' 
Architect of 21st Century Cartel Dictatorship 


Total Control of Societies in All European Nations 

Already, prior to the passing of the 'Lisbon Enabling Act', the 'Brussels 
EU' determined about 80% of all legal acts within the member coun- 
tries of the 'Brussels EU'. The monopoly for the initiation of these law 
rests with the Cartel's politburo, the 'EU Commission' - not the 'EU 

This is the result of the so-called 'Treaties of Rome', crafted half a cen- 
tury ago by the Hallstein team on behalf of the Cartel. After the 'Lisbon 
Enabling Act', this percentage will reach close to 100% - i.e. the total 
control of the European nations, societies and people by the Cartel. 

Most of these laws listed by Hallstein in his 1939 'Conquest Speech' 
(facing page) will be implemented across Europe by the 'Brussels EU'. 
Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' is not only a unique historic doc- 
ument, but also extremely timely: It provides the reader of this book - 
in fact every person in Europe today - a precise look into the future of 
this continent under the rule of the 'Brussels EU'. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

"From the Economy Laws the 'Order to Enforce the Four Year 
Plan' 62 

The "Four- Year-Plan" of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition was the 'Central Eco- 
nomic Plan' of the Nazi/Cartel dictatorship for the conquest of Europe. 

'Furthermore, the Rules about the Production Sector of the 
Economy ['gewerblichen Wirtschafi'], 

The "Rules about the Production Sector of the Economy" was 

part of the centralized totalitarian economic governance of the Nazi/Car- 
tel dictatorshipwith the goal to secure Cartel's economic control over Eu- 

"About Cartel Laws ['Kartellrecht'], about Corporate Advertise- 
ment ['Wirtschafts-Werbung'], about the Formation of Prices 

['Preisbildung'], in particular about governmental regulations to 
fix prices ['Preisstopverordnung']; 

From the Civil Law ['Zivilprozessrecht'] the law of preventing 
the abuse of executive powers ['Verhutung missbrauchlicher 
Ausnutzung von Vollstreckungsmoglichkeiten']; 

From the Criminal Law, in particular the Laws aboutTreason 
and High Treason ['Hoch- und Landesverrat']; 

62 'Verordnung zur Durchfiihrung des Vierjahresplans', i.e. the 'Four Year Plan' office 
was the central agency for coordinating the criminal activities between the Oil and 
Drug Cartel IG Farben and the Nazi government in preparing for World War II. The 
two key figures were Dr. Carl Krauch, CEO of the IG Farben cartel (BAYER, BASF, 
HOECHST and other chemical corporations) and Hermann Goering. As the Nurem- 
berg War Crimes Tribunals later documented, this 'Four Year Plan Office' fulfilled 
several key functions, among them: 


The Nazi/IGFarben 'Four- Year-Plan Office': 
The Cartel's Blueprint for the 'EU Commission' 

IG Farben's NW7 'Economic 
Planning Office' in Berlin 

• ■Tl 

Carl Krauch 
Sentenced to 6 
Years in Prison 
for Enslave- 
ment, Torture, 
Murder and 
other War 

H. Goering 


Death Sentence 

in Nuremberg 

by Suicide 

The Nazi/IG Farben Cartel 'Four- Year-Plan Office' 

- also known as "Krauch Office" (Nuremberg Tribunal) - 

• Prepared the Nazis technically and logistically for WWII 

• Coordinated the plundering of conquered Europe 

• Was run by its 'Plenipotentiary' IG Farben Director, Karl 
Krauch, who commanded thousands of technocrats 

• Was the 'Economic Government' of conquered Europe 

• Became the Cartel's - and Hallstein's - blueprint and 
model for the 'European Commission' 

a) Prepare Nazi Germany technically and logistically for war; 

b) Coordinate the immense production and supply of explosives and other war essen- 
tial materials to the Wehrmacht; 

c) Coordinate intelligence gathered by BAYER, BASF and other IG Farben subsidiaries 
from dozens of countries and use it for strategic war planning; 

Further information: GB2FY461 


The Cartel's 'Economic Government' 
1936 to 1945: The 'Four-Year-Plan Office' 

The "Four-Year-Plan Of- 
fice" - the Cartel's 'Eco- 
nomic Government' for 

the conquest of Europe - 
published a monthly jour- 
nal entitled "The Four- Year 
Plan - Journal of National- 
socialist Economic Policy" 
[Der Vierjahresplan, Zeit- 
schrift fuer Nationalsozial- 
istische Wirtschaftspolitik]. 

The first "Four Year Plan" 
was launched in 1936 and 
had the goal to prepare 
Germany for WWII - under 
the technological and eco- 
nomic guidance of the IG 
Farben Cartel. 

«s — 


ErtHM fr ********** QfTMrcM 

H - 


Many of these "Four- Year-Plan" 
volumes have been preserved. 
Top: Title page of the January 
1937 volume with Hitler and 
Goering on the cover, left: A 
title page during the war, re- 
flecting economic conquest as 
the true purpose of WWII. 

The extensive 'adverising sec- 
tion' of this publication by the 
Nazi/Cartel's 'Economic gov- 
ernment' reads like a 'Who's 
who' of corporate Germany. 
These Journals will tell - 
clearer than most history 
books - on whose behalf 
WWII was being launched. 


The Cartel's 'Economic Government' 
Today: The 'Brussels EU' 

^V *^Hr 


Wednesday, Mar 31 201 

Britain faces losing power over 
its own Budget under new plans 
for an 'economic Government of 
the EU f 


Britain could be forced to have Its Buagel 
signed oir oy European leaders under 
plane to impose an "economic 
OOWmmecrt of the EU' it emerged 

German Cnancellor ^Jigela Merfcel i£ 
pressing for 'avers ighf of national 
ecOrtO-ftileE 10 &e included in 
rantraversial aifangements trial were 
agre&d by EU 1^5 cie rs yesterday. 

65 years after the last volume of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition's 'Eco- 
nomic Government' gazette "Four- Year-Plan" was published, the 
Cartel is preparing the 'resurrection' of the very same totalitarian 
construct: Through the Cartel's political stakeholders today, the 
heads of its leading export nations, these interest groups are pro- 
posing a dictatorial 'Economic Government' under the control 
of the Brussels EU'. Mankind must not wait for another catas- 
trophe and the next 'Nuremberg Tribunal' to stop these plans! 

Further information: GB2EG298 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

"Ffrom the Private Law ['Privatrecht'], the new Shareholder Law 
['Aktienrecht'], the Law relating to Bills of Exchange and 
Checks ['Wechsel- und Scheckrecht'], the Rail road Traffic Laws 
['Eisenbahn verkehrsordnung '] and others 63 ; 

"The introduction of these laws of great urgency cannot simply be 
accomplished by a naked sentence that orders these laws into force 
in the new [Nazi/Cartel occupied] territories. 

"By the way, these laws have not been introduced in the Sudeten- 
land [part of today's Czech Republic] at the same speed (as in Aus- 
tria), because of the insufficient time 64 but also because [in case 

If the 'Lisbon Enabling Act' is implemented, the Cartel will not just "take 
over an entire State", but take control over all countries of Europe - in- 
cluding their economies, societies and the lives of all its citizens for gen- 
erations to come. 

of Sudetenland] we could not take over[!] an entire State with a 

defined legal system 

"The structure of the administrative organization of Austria andSude- 
tenland, which is currently being shaped, will serve as a model for 
the future administration of the entire Reich. 65 This has been out- 
lined by Reich (Interior) minister Trick a few days ago, during a 
speech at the 'Academy of Administration' in Hamburg (Germany): 

"At the lower level (of this administrative structure in conquered 
countries) there will be the entities of the cities and counties 
rStadt- und Landkreise']; the counties are a mixture of adminis- 
trative districts of the State ['staatliche Verwaltungsbezirke'] and 

d) Coordinate the plundering of the key industrial corporations by the IG Farben cartel 
in those countries conquered by the Nazi Wehrmacht; this led to the sentencing of 
several IG Farben executives at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal not only for 
genocide and slavery but also for plundering. 


Halstein's 1939 Vision 
Is Becoming Reality Today 

I Fury as EU approves GM potato 

Critics >Mm plw hum jptewP w»io5e-t*i;lsw disease* Ionian* 

Qv Hflrtfi* HIcbnian *+J CaiiariftT* Ftetartf 

ThundBy. -H HfcLh MiO 

Tha irQuduCIien iir A l|u FiJilJI- Inudifiud 

pottftn in Europe risk? th* rjf^npment nf 
human dueaaea -that fai tn respond tD 
avrobiucics.. it was clirrwd lasc ■■; i:. 

Qcnrian chemical niant BASF thu i^ee*: won 
appf nvd frnm the ELrapaan Cnmmaaran far 
commaTQal -j u.vifj -:- j a search? pucaco nidi a 
gs^e ih?i mdd r«isi anDboci^ - use 1 ^ in 
the fi^vt agamat "ineaaes such « tubercuinpa 

Fi mi h Carmany. Spartan, [ha Uaihariands 
v*l the Czech RJepubbc may plant the pntato 
far nriustrial uje, nrth part at" the. tuber J cd tn 
tarda., iccardi-ici co E*S r . -rthch rough: a :> 
y^ 1 battle w ^h apf/ow-sl i^ ^mnora Bui 

other EU memfcer atatea. nctrfng ttary arid 
Auitrii : id anti-CU campaignatt J ■■ q i d -,- 
aiLacioad iha muua.. dalmmg ii codd insure in a 
health dn-wter 

With the patenting of our 
food, the Cartel is not only 
seeking to create a multi- 
trillion dollar global mar- 
ket. There is also a highly 
political component: The 
ultimate dependency of 
millions of people upon 
GMO foods will place en- 

tire populations at the 
mercy of these patent- 
holding companies 

It is no coincidence that 
BASF - a member of the 
criminal IG Farben Cartel 
- is spearheading this 
fateful development. 

33 That Hallstein listed these specific laws here in such an explicit form was no coinci- 
dence. These - seemingly unrelated - laws, regulations and orders all served one 
common goal: the internal and external mobilization for war. 

34 since the Annexation in October 1938 and Hallstein's speech in January 1939. 

35 'kiinftigen Reichsverwaltung', i.e. it will be applied to other countries conquered by 
the Nazi / IG Farben coalition in Europe and the rest of the world]. 


Hallstein's 1939 'Conquest Speech' 

self-administrated bodies ['Selbstverwaltungs-Korperschaften'], 
they will be led by an administrative head ['Lane/rat']; 

At the middle level (of this administrative structure) there will 
be the entities of regions of the Reich ['Reichsgaue'], also a mix- 
ture of administrative districts of the state and self-administrated 
bodies; they will be led by governors of the Reich. 66 

'These few examples may give you an impression 
how much still needs to be done to execute after the 
political Germanization and also the Legal German- 
ization of the New Territories. 67 An overwhelming 
abundance of great opportunities lies in front of the 
German 'Protector of the [Nazi/Cartei] Law'. 

"He will seize it with a deep trust in the future of our 
people ['(Arian) Volk'J and with the consciousness 
that it is an honor for him to share a modest part of 
the burden of the construction work towards the 
completion of the grand historical task of Germany 68 
we all have been made part of." 

The implementation of the 2009 'Lisbon Enabling Act' would turn the 
culminating final paragraphs of Hallstein's 'Conquest Speech' into sober- 
ing reality today - for the people of Europe and the world. 

66 'Reichsstatthalter', they were fanatic members of the SS, Nazi soldiers or bureau- 
crats, sworn to ruthlessly carry out the orders of the oil and drug cartel and its po- 
litical puppets (see above). 

67 'Nach der politischen auch die rechtliche Eindeutschung' i.e. the [military] and po- 
litical subjugation of Europe is cemented for eternity by the establishment of a new 
German [Nazi/Cartel] legal system across Europe and the world. 

68 'Grosse geschichtliche Aufgabe Deutschlands' i.e. the great historical mission of the 
German Chemical, Oil and Drug Cartel to conquer and control Europe and the world. 


Hallstein's 1939 Vision 
Is Becoming Reality Today 

UK economy News - Cnfoy Kith March 20 10 

EU leaders make play for new European 

Friday 26th March 2010 

■European Union lei[Jers From GtrrtHwy and France Art s-iid 
to be behind a pelentan? cantraversiil move *hich would 
see th* mtroductkin of "an economic govannmant of the &J', 
In simple ti'mfl this *oul<3 b» an authority wtfriin the 
European ^Jnion which nOuld oversee Lhe M&nomiea <:' 
■nembfer cnurWifti fend where 'relevant' would have :-■« 
■rawer to implement fines if states cortfoivje with long tern 
high budgst deficits- 5c what *ould th* maan F<rr th* UK? 

The political heirs of the 'Ar- 
chitects of Auschwitz'are 
spearheading the Cartel's 
next attempt at the control 
- and ultimately the lives - 
of millions of people. 

Merkel (BAYER, BASF) and 
Sarkozy (HOECHST/today 
SANOFI) are the political 
stakeholders of the three 
Cartel sisters ultimately re- 

sponsible for two World Wars. 

The exposure of the crimi- 
nal past of these Cartel 
companies is a timely 
event. The worldwide dis- 
semination of the informa- 
tion of this book will enable 
mankind to learn important 
lessons from history and not 
fall prey to these Cartel in- 
terests a third time. 


No One Can Say: "I Did Not Know!" 





His entire life, Hallstein 
had remained a notori- 
ous servant of the Cartel. 
Like a compulsive of- 
fender is driven from one 
crime scene to the next, so 
was Hallstein never resting 
in his quest to complete his 
assignment: to deliver Eu- 
rope into the hands of the 

While Hallstein, obviously, 
could not to openly reveal 
the corporate interests he 
was serving, he wrote strik- 
ingly candidly about his in- 
tentions when constructing 
the 'Brussels EU/ 






In his 500 page book The 
European Community' [Die 
Europaische Gemeinschaft], 
which, by 1979 was al- 
ready in its 5th edition, he 
even brags about the "orig- 
inal" nature of the center 
piece of his construct, the 
'EU Commission', as being 
"without any direct prece- 
dent in history". 


Propagation of Cartel Dictatorship 

The Constitutional Organs 
• The Commission 

"Every action starts with the [EU] Commission. 

"The [EU] Commission is the most original element in the or- 
ganization of the [European] Community without any direct 
precedent in history. 

"Its function is to represent the [European] Community to the 
inside and to the outside. ... 

"The [EU] Commission is independent of the governments of 
the member states. Instructions of the member States must 
not be given to nor taken by the [EU] Commission 

"The Commission has the monopoly to initiate legislation ... 

Walter Hallstein 
"The European Community" 

5th Edition 
Econ Verlag, Dusseldorf, 1 979 

It is obvious that few of the Now it is high time - for 

political leaders who signed democratic politicians and 

the 'Lisbon Enabling Act' millions of people alike -to 

actually read Hallstein's stand up for the fundamen- 

book - and that even fewer tal rights of freedom and 

have taken him seriously. democracy. If we do not act 

now, we may not get an- 

Boldened by this complacen- other chance to do so for 

cy the Cartel moved ahead, generations. 


Seven decades after Hallstein outlined his 
vision of Europe in this speech it is close 
to becoming reality. 

Sarkozy, Merkel, Berlusconi and other 
politicians are ruthlessly carrying out the 
orders of the Oil and Drug Cartel. 

It is no coincidence that these very same 
politicians have been coercing other po- 
litical leaders into signing the Enabling Act 
for the Cartel's take-over of Europe, the so- 
called 'Lisbon Treaty'. 

Since these politicains did not have the 
coureage to resist the coercion of the Car- 
tel's stakeholders, the people of Europe 
have to make a decision: Accept this cor- 
porate dictatorship over Europe - or pro- 
tect our fundamental right to democracy 
for this generation of Europeans and all 
those yet to come. 




Greater Sphere Cartel 

Chapter 3 


'Greater Sphere Cartel ' 

('Das Grolkaum-Kartell') 

and its organizational 


Chapter 3 

Walter Hallstein was by no means the only architect of a post- 
WWII world under the control of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition. By 
1941, the Nazi regime was maintaining several official 'institutes' 
with one purpose only: Preparing the future economic and politi- 
cal shape of the world - to be established after a Nazi/Cartel vic- 
tory in WWII. 

One of these 'conquest institutes' 
was the "Central Research Insti- 
tute for National Economic 
Order and Greater Sphere Econ- 
omy" in Dresden, Germany. The 
head of this official Nazi/Cartel 
planning office was Arno Soelter. 

In 1941, Soelter summarized the 
Nazi/Cartel plans for a post- 
WWII Europe under their control 
in his book: "The Greater Sphere 
Cartel - An Instrument of Indus- 
trial Market Order in a New Eu- 
rope." [The original German title 
was: "Das GroBraum- Kartell - 
Ein Instrument der industriellen 
Marktordnung in einem neuen 

Soelter's book became a blueprint for the 'Brussels EU'. 
The parallels are breathtaking. 


Greater Sphere Cartel 

The Nazi's 'Greater Sphere Cartel' - 
Blueprint for the Structure and Function 
of the 'Brussels EU' 


The German word Groftraum, or "grower 
Raum/' literally means greater space or 
greater sphere. 

By the summer of 1 941 , the coalition of 
the oil and drug cartel I.G. Farben - 
Bayer, BASF, Hoechst (today a part of 
Sanofi-Aventis) - and their political/mili- 
tary stakeholders, the Nazis, had occu- 
pied France and brutally conquered large 
parts of Europe. 

It was at this time that the oil and drug 
cartel I.G. Farben began to reveal its 
post-war plans. After financing the rise of 
the Nazis and the build up of their war 
machinery (which provided almost 
1 00% of the explosives, gasoline, rubber, 
and the majority of other war essentials), 
the oil and drug cartel was looking for an 
exorbitant return on its investment. 

Hj^HHTt J^^T 

[__ •' ^^ 


^^ _ ^~* , 

V '* 



Arno Solter, head of the 
official Nazi "Central Re- 
search Institute for Na- 
tional Economic Order 
and Greater Sphere 
Economy" and author of 
the book, "The Greater 
Sphere Cartel." 

("Das Grofcraum-Kartell") 

These facts are detailed in the 1945 US Congressional hearings 
on I.G. Farben and in the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals 
against it. ( 


Chapter 3 

The I.G. Farben cartel got the return on its investment that it was 
seeking. From the roughly 20 countries that were brutally con- 
quered by the Nazi troops, I.G. Farben essentially received all of 
the chemical, pharmaceutical, petrochemical, mineral and other 
industries - mostly for free. Behind every tank that rolled into Bel- 
gium, the Netherlands, France, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, 
Norway and all the other European countries, there followed the 
"men in grey suits" - the corporate representatives of I.G. Farben 
seeking to seize their booty. 

This unscrupulous plunder of entire industries and countries be- 
came the blueprint for subsequent global heists - right up to the 
present day: Halliburton, various oil and drug multinationals and 
other corporate "investors" in the Bush presidency made sure they 
got the return on their investments during the Iraq war. 

But back to WWII: the I.G. Farben terminology of a post-war rule 
over a "greater sphere" initially described the territory of Europe as 
including Russia. But this term was deliberately kept flexible so that 
- with the projected military victories over Asia, America and the 
rest of the world - the term "greater sphere" would eventually com- 
prise the entire globe. 

These plans for military world conquest and subsequent economic 
subjugation by the Nazi/I. G. Farben coalition are detailed in the 
Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals against the directors of the I.G. 
Farben cartel. Copies of more than 40,000 original documents from 
this historic trial were hidden away from the public in the U.S. Na- 
tional Archives for 6 decades. In 2007, they were finally published 
online at 

The following detailed description of the I.G. Farben post-WWII 
plans was published in a 1941 book by Arno Solter entitled "The 
Greater Sphere Cartel - An Instrument of Industrial Market Order 


Greater Sphere Cartel 

in a New Europe/' [The original title in German was: Das 
Gro&raum-Kartell - Ein Instrument der industriellen Marktordnung 
in einem neuen Europa]. 

The publication of this book was not the act of an individual. Solter 
was head of the official Nazi "Central Research Institute for National 
Economic Order and Greater Sphere Economy" in Dresden, Ger- 
many, at that time. This "Institute" was one of the official economic 
planning offices of the Nazi/Farben coalition for post-war Europe. 

This book provides the blueprint of what would later become the 
structure of the European Union - a body of cartel interests, claim- 
ing "greater spheres" as their markets - and operating beyond any 
democratic control. 



'We recall the market organization hierarchy: State - Economic 
Group - Cartel, which we have established for the Greater Sphere. 
In this connection, we are disregarding the state's responsibilities 
in the field of commercial and currency policy within the Greater 
Sphere. Instead we want to look in greater detail at the problem of 
the organization of the European market from a cartel point of view 
and, subsequently, look in detail at the problems of the economic 
policies of the state, which inevitably result due to the principle 
market regulation of the whole area of the 'Grofcraum-KartelT. Di- 
rectly in charge of the "Gro&raum-Kartell" is the Economic Group, 
whose market-regulating functions we want to see brought together 
in a 'Cartel Office/ 


Chapter 3 

"To this end the existing cartel department for the Economic Groups 
would have to be expanded to take on the functions of this new of- 
fice. Superior to the Cartel Office would be the Central Cartel Of- 
fice, which on grounds of the remit assigned to it would correspond 
to the present 'Cartel Supervision' department of the German In- 
dustry Group (Reichsgruppe Industrie), but also to the cartel depart- 
ment or specialist departments of the German Ministry for 
Econom ic A ffa irs " 1 . 

Today's EU -Commission is an exact copy of this 
"Central Cartel Office/' It rules on behalf of cartel 
interests and beyond any democratic control. 

"From a practical point of view, the tasks would have to be divided 
up in order to avoid the duplication of work. It would be expedient 
to assign the factual supervision of the cartel offices to the Ministry 
for Economic Affairs, whereas the duties of the Central Cartel Office 
for Industry would be more in dealing with questions of fundamen- 
tal market organization, as well as legal and interstate cartel ques- 
tions. In order to operate effectively, the Office for Industry would 
have to be kept informed about any problems arising. If we subse- 
quently discuss the objectives of the "Central Cartel Office" we 
shall also discuss the associated business and organizational prob- 
lems, i.e. those not itemized according to the above-mentioned au- 

"It naturally follows that the German method of cartel supervision 
will also be introduced in the non-German parts of the European 
Sphere of Influence. The extent and nature of the organization in 
other countries would naturally vary depending on their degree of 
industrialization. Below we discuss the mode of operation of the 
organization of the cartel in relation to the prevailing conditions in 

On grounds of organizational simplification, we regard the involvement of 
the German Economic Chamber (Reichswirtschaftskammer) as undesirable. 


Greater Sphere Cartel 

1 . The Central Cartel Office 

a) The Central Cartel Office is the highest regulatory authority; ac- 
cordingly it is 

i) responsible for taking final decisions on questions of areas of 
responsibility of the cartel supervision; 

ii) responsible for 
maintaining close 
contact with the 
highest expert 
bodies i.e. eco- 
nomic and trading 
policies, pricing 
policies, commod- 
ity policies, etc.) 
and for coordinat- 
ing with said ex- 
pert bodies its 
subject- related de- 
cisions and funda- 
mental instructions 
to subordinate in- 

b) The Central Cartel 
Office maintains 
contact with possi- 
ble central na- 
tional cartel offices 
of the other Euro- 
pean countries both 
mental issues and 

The 'Central Cartel Office' of the 'Brussels 
EU: The Berlaymont building of the 'EU 
Commission' in Brussels. In fact, this build- 
ing is just one of several dozen office com- 
plexes of the 'EU Commission' in Brussels. 
These structures are the operative bases for 
more than 54,000 unelected career bu- 
reaucrats who rule over Europe on behalf 
of the Cartel. 

in terms of dealing with important funda- 
concerning decisions about areas of 


Chapter 3 

responsibility that the 
'Grofcraum-Karteir or 
the individual national 
cartels cannot agree 

c) Accordingly the 
Central Cartel Office 
represents the appro- 
priate complaint de- 
partment regarding the 
decisions taken by car- 
tel offices. Further- 
more, complaints 
concerning such mat- 
ters as action taken 
and infringements 
committed by foreign 

cartels should be made 

The 'Crown Room' of the Brussels EU 'Cen- ., ^ . , ^ . , 

* ir-irur / A. *• c *u via tne Central Cartel 

tral Cartel Office : The meeting room of the „. 

'EU Commission' on the 13th floor of its ottlce - 

Brussels Headquarters. 

d) Cartel law, which is 

currently very diverse 
and poorly organized, would have to be reformed and as far as 
possible standardized for the entire greater sphere. 

More than 6 decades later, the EU Commission implements 
an almost exact copy of this plan with the goal of establish- 
ing "standardized cartel law" to rule over the lives of almost 
500 million Europeans - without any democratic control. 


Greater Sphere Cartel 

e) General market regulation principles for the European Greater 
Sphere would have to be drawn up. As regards to market- and 
cartel regulation, similar rules have to be established, just like 
those economic decrees that have been worked out or rather, 
are still worked on, by the Ministry for Economic Affairs for the 
accounting system. 

A few decades later, the Nazi/I.G. Farben "Cartel decrees" 
became "EU Directives" - ruling not only over the health 
and lives of the peoples of Europe but also draining their 

f) In business economics, too, cooperation with non-German 
countries must be introduced in order to be able to prepare 
sound market regulation (including intercompany comparisons). 

g) A model organizational plan for a "Gro&raum-Kartell" would 
have to be drawn up, along with clear, simple model of articles 
of association. To ensure effective cartel supervision, a suitably 
drafted cartel agreement is indispensible. Due to historical de- 
velopments and often countless changes in contractual provi- 
sions, many cartel agreements end up becoming completely 
impenetrable. Therefore, in future, a suitably-formulated master 
agreement must be finalized which governs the details of any 
ongoing changes or supplementary agreements. 

This "master agreement" eventually became the EU's so 
called " Lisbon Treaty" - an "enabling law" passed in 2009 
that grants quasi-dictatorial powers to the cartel's "EU 
Commission". For good reason, fearing that it would be re- 
jected by the people of Europe, the cartel did not allow a 
democratic pan-European referendum on this "master 
agreement". Notably, therefore, the people of the only 
country that voted on the treaty, Ireland, sent a resounding 
"No" to the "central cartel office" - the EU Commission in 
Brussels - in June 2008. 


Chapter 3 

Official Journal 

of the European Uni< 


C 306 




Suitable unified classi- 
fication schemes must 
also be devised for car- 
tel production and dis- 
tribution statistics. The 
sales statistics must be 
laid out in such a way 
that at any time distri- 
bution can be adjusted 
according to consump- 
tion needs. 

EN I A central cartel register 

must be set up, includ- 
ing not just German 
but also international 
participants in all areas 
of influence of the "Gro&raum-Kartell" . The cartel register must 
include both the nature of agreements reached and details of 
commodity procurement, business premises, production con- 
ditions and the like. To a degree, the register must represent a 
mirror image of the "Groftraum-Kartell" as a whole. 

j) The Central Cartel Office would have to arrange the publication 
of a journal entitled "Das Gro&raum-Kartell" ("The Greater 
Sphere Cartel"), which would publish all decisions of the high- 
est authority on all fundamental questions of European market 
regulation, directives [!] and similar matters. 


Greater Sphere Cartel 

This point, too, was also adapted by the Brussels EU, which 
issues the "Official Journal of the European Union as its 
"legal gazette/' No regulation or directive can become law 
in the EU until it has been published in this gazette. 

The text in bold and parentheses are added commentaries. 


One could be forgiven for thinking that Arno Solter was one of the 
Nazi-criminals who had disappeared from the face of the earth at 
the end of the "thousand year Reich " in 1945. 

Such a naive assumption would be very far from the truth, how- 
ever. In reality, the services of this Nazi/cartel architect of the sub- 
jugation of Europe to the interests of the cartel remained in high 
demand in the post-war years. In 1962, 5 years after the creation 
of the European Economic Community, Solter again made a name 
for himself as a cartel strategist within the EWG European Eco- 
nomic Community. 

Under the title "Vertriebsbindungen im gemeinsamen Markt unter 
wirtschaftlichem und EWG-kartellrechtlichen Aspekt," (Exclusive 
distribution rights in a common market under economic and EEC- 
cartels legal aspects), Solter published his old and new cartel con- 
cepts in issue 4/1962 of the periodical "Kartellrundschau" of the 
Carl Heymanns publishing house. 

In view of the seamless transitions from European strategists of the 
Third Reich to architects of the 'Brussels EU' that we describe in 
this book, no one should ever again be surprised by the quasi-dic- 
tatorial character of the 'Brussels EU'. 

Further information: GB3A5666 


Chapter 3 


Chapter 4 


What the Oil and 
Drug Cartel and its 
political stakeholders 
don't want you to 


Chapter 4 

The EU Treaties: 

The Oil and Drug Cartel's attempts to 

consolidate its political power over 


In the political arena, the 1990s and the first decade of the 21st 
century saw the Oil and Drug Cartel taking increasingly ambitious 
steps towards the consolidation of its political power over Europe 
-the ultimate aim being the creation of a global Politburo to defend 
against the threat from natural health and secure the Cartel's global 
monopoly with patented drugs. The principle elements of these 
moves involved the signing of the Maastricht Treaty, in 1992; the 
Amsterdam Treaty, in 1 997; the Nice Treaty, in 2001 ; and the Lisbon 
Treaty, which became law in December 2009. 

For each of these treaties, it should be noted that the vast majority 
of people in Europe were given no opportunity whatsoever to reject 
their governments' decisions to sign away their rights and freedoms 
through these treaties. If the Brussels EU were a true democracy, of 
course, all EU citizens would first have had the right to express their 
will via public referendums and, in all likelihood, these treaties 
would never have been signed. 

The Maastricht Treaty: 

• Restructured the EU and opened the way to political integra- 
tion, thus giving the Cartel a greater degree of political control 
over EU countries. 

• Established economic and monetary union, thus giving the Car- 
tel a greater degree of economic control over EU countries. 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 

• Established a common foreign and security policy, thus giving 
the Cartel a greater degree of control over activities of the EU 
countries on the international stage. 

• Established "consumer 
protection" policies, thus 
enabling the Cartel to use 
these as a cover for enforc- 
ing its interests. The EU's 
so-called Food Supple- 
ments Directive, passed in 
2002, became a classic ex- 
ample of this, whereby Eu- 
rope-wide restrictions on 
the sale of vitamin and 
mineral supplements were 
brought in on the grounds 
they were necessary "to 
ensure a high level of pro- 
tection for consumers". In 
reality, of course, the re- 
strictions were intended to 
protect the pharmaceutical 
industry's multi-billion 
euro sales from synthetic 

patented drugs, which, as a result of the discovery of the 
scurvy/heart disease connection, were threatened by the use of 
non-patentable therapies such as vitamins. 

The signing of the Maastricht Treaty, 
7 February, 1992. 

Further information: GB3MT347 


Chapter 4 

The Amsterdam Treaty: 

• Brought affairs related to free movement of persons under the 
EU's legal framework. This made it necessary to create informa- 
tion systems on a European scale, thus giving the Cartel greater 
abilities to interfere in the private lives of EU citizens. 

• Agreed a program for development of Europol (the European 
Police Office) activities, thus enabling the Cartel to further its 
controls over the freedoms of European citizens across national 

• Further developed the common security policy to enable the 
gradual formulation of a common defence policy, thus provid- 
ing the means by which the Cartel could eventually achieve 
military control at the global level. 


European leaders assembled for the signing of the Amsterdam Treaty, 
2 October, 1997. 

Further information: GB3AT833 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 

Oil and drug cartel's influence on the content of the Amsterdam 
Treaty and the EU's risk assessment system 

In January 2010, academics at the universities of Bath and Edin- 
burgh in the UK published evidence that manufacturers of oil, phar- 
maceuticals, chemicals, food and tobacco had jointly engaged in 
a successful long-term lobbying strategy during the mid-1990s to 
shape European Union policy making in their favour. 

According to the study, published in the Public Library of Science 
Medicine journal and reported on the website, 
major corporations, including Shell, Bayer, Zeneca, SmithKline 
Beecham, Unilever, Tesco and British American Tobacco had 
mounted a multi-year lobby campaign aimed at shaping the EU's 
impact assessment system to ensure that it emphasized business in- 
terests at the expense of public health. 

The form of impact assessment pushed by these multinationals was 
eventually brought in by the EU via the passing of the Treaty of Am- 

Significantly, therefore, the EU's Food Supplements Directive, which 
became law in 2002, utilizes risk assessment as a means of bringing 
about Europe-wide restrictions on the sale of vitamin and mineral 
supplements to protect the pharmaceutical industry's sales of syn- 
thetic patented drugs. 

The Nice Treaty: 

• Brought in a qualified majority voting system for the European 
Council, thus further reducing the ability of individual EU mem- 
ber states to oppose the interests of the Cartel. As a result of this 
change, the three main Cartel countries - Germany, France and 
the UK - along with Italy, now effectively hold the balance of 
power in the Council. 

Further information: GB3NT972 


Chapter 4 

Increased and redistributed the number of seats in the European 
Parliament in favour of the three main Cartel countries - Ger- 
many, France and the UK - plus Italy. 

26 F6VRIBR 2001 

ft t ?t**)V 

■* # 

The signing of the Nice Treaty, 26 February, 2001. 

The Lisbon Treaty 

The Lisbon Treaty, which became law in the European Union in De- 
cember 2009, elevated the Oil and Drug Cartel's attempt to con- 
solidate its political power over Europe to a whole new level. 
Intended to legitimize the construct of the "Brussels EU", the treaty 
forms the basis of a future Europe that is fundamentally undemoc- 
ratic. A clear and unmistakable step towards the implementation of 
a European-wide dictatorship, the treaty provides: 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 

No separation of constitutional powers -thus eliminating a key 
element that is essential to any democracy. 

No possibility for the European people to democratically elect 
their president. Instead, the president is chosen in secret by the 
European political elite on behalf of corporate interests. 

No possibility for the people to elect the 2 7-member "European 
Commission". Instead, this executive level or cabinet of the Eu- 
ropean government is "appointed" by the European political 
elite on behalf of corporate interests. 

No possibility for the people to replace the European Commis- 
sion - even if they overwhelmingly consider that it has abused 
and reduced their human rights. 

No possibility for the people to prevent their rights and free- 
doms from being still further eroded. Designed as "self-amend- 
ing" legislation, the Lisbon Treaty enables the "Brussels EU" to 
decide as and when it wants more powers and to take them 
without having to give the people a referendum. 

The undemocratic history of the Lisbon Treaty 

The "Convention on the Future of Europe", a body chaired by for- 
mer French president Valery Giscard d'Estaing, had originally 
started work on a so-called "European Constitution" in February 
2002. The draft text for the Constitution was submitted to an EU 
summit in June 2003 and agreed in June 2004. 

In May 2005, however, the French people voted 'No' to the Con- 
stitution in a national referendum. The following month, in June 
2005, the Dutch people also voted 'No'. The Constitution was sub- 
sequently put "on ice" for a period of "reflection", and, at least for 
a short time, it appeared possible that it might not resurface. 


Chapter 4 

In January 2007, Germany, under Angela Merkel, took over the EU 
Presidency and declared the period of reflection over. A mere two 
months later, in March, the Berlin Declaration - outlining the in- 
tention of all EU member states to agree on a new EU treaty in time 
for the 2009 Parliamentary elections - was adopted by all EU mem- 
ber states. The text of the new treaty, from then on to be known as 
the Lisbon Treaty, was subsequently released on 4 June 2007. 

To the shock of the French and 
Dutch, however -and, also, count- 
less millions of democratic people 
throughout Europe - 96 per cent of 
its articles turned out to have been 
copied from the rejected EU Con- 
stitution. As shock turned to anger, 
even Valery Giscard d'Estaing, the 
text's principal draftsman, was 
eventually forced to admit that dif- 
ferences between the treaty and the 
constitution "are few and far be- 
tween and more cosmetic than 

German Chancellor Angela 
Merkel was instrumental in res- 
urrecting the rejected European 
Constitution and renaming it as 
the Lisbon Treaty. 

Despite the overt deception that 
had taken place, the Lisbon Treaty 
was signed by leaders of the 27 EU 
member states in Lisbon, Portugal, 
on 13 December 2007. The only 

country that subsequently chose to put the treaty to a democratic 
public referendum was Ireland; in all of the other 26 member states 
- including France and the Netherlands, both of which had previ- 
ously rejected the almost identical "EU Constitution" in public ref- 
erendums - the treaty was passed by the countries' national 
parliaments without any public vote being allowed. 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 

British Prime 
Brown and 
French Presi- 
dent Nicolas 
Sarkozy rang Jose Socrates, the 
Portuguese Prime Minister, to 
insist that a referendum on the 
Lisbon Treaty was not necessary. 

In Portugal, a referendum on the 
treaty was ruled out after pressure 
from British Prime Minister Gordon 
Brown and French President Nico- 
las Sarkozy. Brown and Sarkozy 
rang Jose Socrates, the Portuguese 
Prime Minister, and insisted that a 
public vote was not necessary. 
(Sarkozy himself had denied the 
French people a referendum on the 
treaty despite an opinion poll 
showing that 58 per cent of the 
country's voters wanted one). 

In June 2008, the Irish people went 
to the polls for their referendum on 
the treaty and voted a firm 'No', 
thus mirroring the votes of the 
French and Dutch on the EU Con- 
stitution in 2005. In a clear and de- 
cisive show of opposition to the 
"Brussels EU", the Lisbon Treaty 
was rejected by 33 out of Ireland's 43 constituencies. With a voter 
turnout of over 53%, any true democracy would at this point have 
listened to the voice of the people and consigned the treaty to the 
dustbins of history where it belonged. 

Instead - and despite polls showing that nearly three-quarters of 
Irish voters were against holding a second referendum on the treaty 
- the "Brussels EU" showed its true colours by demanding that Ire- 
land voted again to produce the "right" result. Rather than bowing 
to the will of the people, as would have happened in any true 
democracy, European Union leaders responded to the 'No' vote by 
giving Ireland a four-month ultimatum to explain how it could win 
public support for the treaty. Nicolas Sarkozy, in particular, insisted 
that: "The Irish will have to vote again". 


Chapter 4 

Subsequently, following political 
interference from the European 
Commission; widespread threats 
and lies to the Irish electorate - in- 
cluding propaganda that a 'No' 
vote would condemn Ireland to 
economic isolation; corporate in- 
terference from the likes of Ryanair 
(who spent half a million euros 
campaigning for a 'Yes'), Intel (who 
spent several hundred thousand) 
and the drug company Pfizer (who 
openly warned of a "flight of capi- 
tal from Ireland if it voted 'No'); 
and, not least of all, the blatant 
sweeping away of Ireland's guide- 
lines on media impartiality (thus 
ensuring that commercial radio 
and television stations did not have 
to give equal airtime to both sides 
in debates on the treaty) the Irish 
people voted 'Yes' in a revote in 
October 2009. As a result, the 
treaty passed into EU law on 1 De- 
cember, 2009. 

Irish Referendum 

on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008 

In Ireland's June 2008 referen- 
dum, the Lisbon Treaty was re- 
jected by 33 out of Ireland's 43 
constituencies. The constituen- 
cies that rejected the treaty are 
shown in pink. 
Image credit: Wikipedia. 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 

Facts and Fiction about 
the Lisbon Treaty 


The Lisbon Treaty does not alter the basic nature of Europe. 

The facts are: Article 1 of the Amendments to 
the Treaty on European Union and to the 
Treaty Establishing the European Community, 
contained in the Lisbon Treaty, states that 
"The Union shall replace and succeed the Eu- 
ropean Community". In addition to this, arti- 
cle 46 A states that 'The Union shall 
have legal personality." Thus, it is ab- 
solutely clear that the post-Lisbon 
Union is a totally new constitutional 
and legal entity and that the Euro- 
pean Community, of which the 27 
member states were previously 
members, has ceased to exist. 

Additionally, under Article 24 of the 
Amendments to the Treaty on Euro- 
pean Union and to the Treaty Estab- 
lishing the European Community, the 
Brussels EU can now sign treaties 
with other countries or international 
organizations, on behalf of its mem- 
ber states, in all areas of its compe- 

Under the Lisbon Treaty, 
Herman van Rompuy was 
appointed as EU President, 
whilst Catherine Ashton 
was installed as EU Foreign 
Minister. In both cases, the 
citizens of Europe were not 
given any opportunity 
whatsoever to vote on these 

And of course, let us not forget that 
the Treaty also created the posts of 
EU President (to which Herman van Rompuy was appointed with- 


Chapter 4 

out any public vote); EU Foreign Minister (to which Catherine Ash- 
ton was appointed without any public vote); and an EU diplomatic 

In reality, therefore, it can be seen that "the basic nature" of Europe 
has actually been substantially altered. 


The Lisbon Treaty facilitates increased democratic control from na- 
tional parliaments. 

The facts are: To all intents and purposes, Article 7 of the Treaty's 
Protocol on the Application of the Principles of Subsidiarity and 
Proportionality only gives national parliaments the power to com- 
plain about things they disagree with. In effect, it merely provides 
a mechanism whereby an objection can be raised if a complaint is 
supported by one third of all national parliaments. However, the 
Brussels EU is under no obligation to change or cancel any of its 
actions and can simply choose to override such a complaint if it 
wishes to do so. 

Moreover, should even the majority of national parliaments raise an 
objection to a legislative proposal brought by the European Com- 
mission, there is still no obligation for the Commission to change or 
cancel any of its actions. In such a situation, it can simply choose to 
override the complaint and refer it to be resolved by the European 
Council and the European parliament. As such, rather than increas- 
ing democratic control from national parliaments, it can be seen 
that, in practice, the bureaucratic nature of the hoops to be jumped 
through makes it extremely unlikely that the dictatorial nature of the 
Brussels EU can be restrained via these mechanisms. 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 


The Lisbon Treaty makes the Brussels EU decision-making process 
more democratic. 

The facts are: Of all the Brussels EU's deceptions, this statement is 
arguably one of the most disingenuous of all. For one thing, unlike 
in a true democracy, the European parliament remains unable to 
freely initiate and enact legislation in all areas of its choosing and 
of its own accord. For another, and as described above, the Lisbon 
Treaty created the posts of EU President and EU Foreign Minister 
and mandated that both were to be appointed without any public 
vote. And in addition, of course, the 27 members of the EU Com- 
mission, the EU's executive body, will continue to be appointed 
without any public vote. 

To make matters worse, article 48 
of the Amendments to the Treaty on 
European Union and to the Treaty 
Establishing the European Commu- 
nity, contained in the Lisbon Treaty, 
makes clear that the Treaty is self- 
amending, in that in future it may 
be amended without having to 
hold an Intergovernmental Confer- 
ence or consult citizens via refer- 

The Lisbon Treaty is self-amend- 
ing and can be amended with- 
out having consult European 
citizens via referendums. 

Bearing these facts in mind, it can 
be seen that, far from being "demo- 
cratic", the executive decision- 
making machinery of the Brussels 
EU is essentially that of an un- 
elected dictatorship. 


Chapter 4 


The Lisbon Treaty responds to concerns raised by European citizens 
and will increase legitimacy in the functioning of the Brussels EU. 

The facts are: Given that concerned citizens in France and the 
Netherlands comprehensively rejected the so-called "European 
Constitution" in national referendums in 2005, the fact that 96 per- 
cent of the text of the Lisbon Treaty is identical to that of the Con- 
stitution, and that over 99 percent of European voters were not 
given any chance to vote on it, makes it absurd for the EU to make 
these claims. 






57 percent of the people of Europe who were eligible to vote in the 2009 
EU elections deliberately abstained, whilst a further 4 percent cast delib- 
erate votes against the EU dictatorship. 

Furthermore, it should not be forgotten that 57 percent of the peo- 
ple of Europe who were eligible to vote in the EU elections in June 
2009 protested against the Brussels EU by deliberately abstaining, 
whilst a further 4 percent of the eligible electorate cast deliberate 
votes against the EU dictatorship by voting for parties that are anti- 
EU and/or opposed to the Lisbon Treaty. As such, any notion that 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 

the Lisbon Treaty addresses the concerns of these people is delu- 
sional, to say the least. 

Fiction: The Lisbon Treaty does not create a European army. 

The facts are: Article 28A (c) 3, paragraph 1, of the Amendments 
to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty Establishing the 
European Community, contained in the Lisbon Treaty, states that 
"Member States shall make civilian and military capabilities avail- 
able to the Union for the implementation of the common security 
and defence policy/' Paragraph 2 still further militarizes the Brussels 
EU by stating that "Member States shall undertake progressively to 
improve their military capabilities" and making clear that the Euro- 
pean Defence Agency will be incorporated into these amended 


Chapter 4 

What the political stakeholders 
of the 'Brussels EU' said about 
the Lisbon Treaty 

Comparing it to the rejected European Constitution: 

'"Public opinion will be led to adopt, without 
knowing it, the proposals that we dare not pres- 
ent to them directly ... All the earlier proposals 
will be in the new text, but will be hidden and 
disguised in some way/' 

Valery Giscard D'Estaing, former French President 
and Chairman of the Convention which drew up 
the European Constitution, Le Monde, 14 June 
2007, and Sunday Telegraph, 7 July 2007 

"The substance of the constitution is preserved. 
That is a fact/' 

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, speech in 
the European Parliament, 27 June 2007 


'The good thing about not calling it a Constitution 
is that no one can ask for a referendum on it." 
Ciuliano Amato, former Italian Prime Minister 
and Vice-Chairman of the Convention which 
drew up the European Constitution, speech at 
the London School of Economics, 2 1 February 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 


The substance of what was agreed in 2004 has 
been retained. What is gone is the term 'consti- 

Dermot Ahern, Irish Foreign Minister, Daily Mail 
Ireland, 25 June 2007 

"Virtual incomprehensibility has thus replaced 
simplicity as the key approach to EU reform. As 
for the changes now proposed to be made to the 
constitutional treaty, most are presentational 
changes that have no practical effect. They have 
simply been designed to enable certain heads of 
government to sell to their people the idea of rat- 
ification by parliamentary action rather than by 

Dr Garret FitzGerald, former Irish Taoiseach, Irish Times, 30 June 


On whether they intended citizens to be able to understand it: 

"They decided that the document should be un- 
readable. If it is unreadable, it is not constitu- 
tional, that was the sort of perception....imagine 
the UK Prime Minister -can go to the Commons 
and say 'Look, you see, it's absolutely unread- 
able, it's the typical Brussels treaty, nothing new, 
no need for a referendum. 1 Should you succeed 
in understanding it at first sight there might be 
some reason for a referendum, because it would 
mean that there is something new." 

Giuliano Amato, former Italian Prime Minister and Vice-Chairman of the 
Convention which drew up the European Constitution, recorded by Open 
Europe, The Centre for European Reform, London, 12 July 2007 


Chapter 4 

"The aim of the Constitutional treaty was to be 
more readable; the aim of this treaty is to be un- 
readable... The Constitution aimed to be clear, 
whereas this treaty had to be unclear. It is a suc- 


Karel de Gucht, Belgian Foreign Minister, Flan- 
dreinfo, 23 June 2007 

On the Irish voting 'No' to the Treaty in 2008: 

^ L 

"All of the [political leaders] know quite well that 

if the similar question was put to their electorate 

by a referendum the answer in 95 per cent of the 

countries would probably have been No as 


Charlie McCreevy, Irish EU Commissioner, Irish 

Times, 27 June, 2009 

On the French voting 'No' to the European Constitution (with 
which the Treaty shares 96 percent of its content) in 2005: 

"France was just ahead of all the other countries 
in voting No. It would happen in all Member 
States if they have a referendum. There is a cleav- 
age between people and governments... A refer- 
endum now would bring Europe into danger. 
There will be no Treaty if we had a referendum 
in France, which would again be followed by a 
referendum in the UK." 

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, speaking at a 
meeting of senior MEPs, The Economist, 14 November 2007 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 

On stripping power and sovereignty away from the People: 

".. I don't think it is a good idea to replace this 
slow and effective method - which keeps na- 
tional States free from anxiety while they are 
being stripped of power - with great institutional 
leaps... Therefore I prefer to go slowly, to crumble 
pieces of sovereignty up little by little, avoiding 
brusque transitions from national to federal 
power. That is the way I think we will have to 
build Europe's common policies..." 
Italian Prime Minister Ciuliano Amato, before he became Vice-Pres- 
ident of the EU Constitutional Convention, interview with Barbara 
Spinelli, La Stampa, 13 July 2000 


Chapter 4 

The Oil and Drug Cartel brings 
Nicolas Sarkozy to power in France 

Nicolas Sarkozy was brought to power by the 
Oil and Drug Cartel in France in 2007. The son 
of a Hungarian aristocrat, his rise to power and 
election had formed part of the Cartel's "Plan B." 
In the event that the White House in the US was 
lost to forces less friendly to the interests of the 
Cartel than President George W. Bush - which 
was eventually the case when President Barack 
Obama was elected in November 2008 - the 
Cartel needed to make sure that other influential governments could 
immediately substitute for that loss. In this situation, nuclear-armed 
France was a prime candidate. 

Sarkozy's rise to power was strategically built up by the Cartel. In 
2004, while still being Minister of the Interior, he coerced the mar- 
riage between French pharmaceutical dwarf Sanofi and Swiss/Ger- 
man drug giant Aventis/Hoechst. The Hoechst corporation, the most 
valuable "bride" in this forced marriage, was of course one of the 
infamous corporate trio (together with Bayer and BASF) who had 
brought Hitler to power and financed the preparations for WWII, 
including the construction of the Auschwitz concentration camp. 
With the move of the Hoechst corporation from Germany to France, 
all the know-how shifted to that country too - how to build up po- 
litical stakeholders, seize executive control, build up quasi-dicta- 
torial regimes and ultimately seek global dominance. The 
diversification of economic power and political know-how away 
from post-Nazi Germany to France was one of those perfect cam- 
ouflages that are hallmarks of the Cartel. 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 

The election campaign of Sarkozy was almost a direct copy of the 
last elections in pre-WWII Germany. The election campaign of the 
Cartel's candidate was financed by French oil, drug and nuclear en- 
ergy corporations - accompanied by Cartel media propaganda. In 
much the same way as in the 1 930s, Sarkozy ran his divisive elec- 
tion campaign on hatred of foreigners and immigrants, in an effort 
to scare mainstream France and drive it into the arms of the Cartel 
candidate. Sarkozy even went so far as to call disenfranchised ju- 
veniles in Paris suburbs "scum" thereby deliberately incinerating 
the political climate and presenting himself as the "law and order" 
candidate. After seizing power in the May 2006 elections he, to- 
gether with Germany's Chancellor Merkel, enthroned himself as the 
new leader of the Brussels EU construct in a fashion often resem- 
bling that of medieval emperors. 

But Europe was not enough for Sarkozy and his corporate sponsors. 
Two years into the office, he proclaimed himself as the leader of a 
Mediterranean empire, forging more than a dozen countries bor- 
dering the Mediterranean Sea into the Cartel's reign. The joint 
EU/Mediterranean Empire strikingly resembles the extent of the 
Roman Empire at the time of Julius Caesar, one of the historic fig- 
ures, beside Napoleon, Sarkozy is apparently striving to emulate. 

When one looks at what he has to offer to those countries, the des- 
perate nature of Sarkozy's 21 st century ventures in Europe, North 
Africa and the Middle East become obvious. At a time when the 

Sarkozy - Corporate Connections 

Sarkozy's rise to power in France in 2006 was financed by "corporate 

France." His main donors are listed below. 

But this corporate support alone would not have been enough to get him 
elected. Thus, his election campaign was propelled by the systematic prop- 
agation of fear - similar to Bush 2004 election. But Sarkozy went one step 
further: he added hatred towards imigrants as a hallmark to his campaign. 
Sarkozy became known around the world for pubicly calling young imi- 
grants living in the suburbs of Paris "scums" - thereby fuelling racial hatred. 
This method of psychological warfare against his own people was aimed 
at driving fearful and intimidated voters into his arms. 


Chapter 4 

The two legs of the Sarkozy election campaign - blatently serving cartel 
interests while at the same time coercing voter's support by fuelling their 
fears - is an exact copy of another election campaign financed by the oil 
and drug cartel in 1933. In that year, the German-based cartel I.G. Farben 
(Bayer, BASF and Hoechst, today a part of French Sanofi Aventis) brought 
another unscroupulus politician to power with devestating consequences 
for our planet. The details of this 1933 support of the oil and drug cartel 
behind the rise of the Nazi party, are documented in the records of the 
1948 Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal against I.G. Farben. 

History tells us: "Those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to 
repeat it." (George Santayana) 

The corporate interests that brought Nicolas Sarkozy to power: 

ariof i av< 



*jn*\t\ Latitat. 



The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 

entire globe is ready to embrace hydrogen and other renewable 
forms of energy, not just for driving cars but also covering major 
parts of the total energy supply, Sarkozy - like a desperate salesman 
- is trying to use outdated nuclear technology to coerce dozens of 
developing and threshold countries into a fateful dependency on 
the oil, drug and nuclear energy Cartel. 

In the eyes of the Cartel, Sarkozy is apparently the ideal replace- 
ment for George W. Bush as the primary stakeholder of its global 


Chapter 4 

Masonic and Mafia Infiltration, 
Fraud, Corruption, Propaganda 
and the Erosion of Civil Liberties 
in the Brussels EU 

Moral values or dubious connections? 

Corruption amongst its officials has been a constant problem within 
the European Commission since its inception. The standing of its 
Commissioners on moral issues can perhaps best be summarised 
in the context of an event that took place in November 2004. Rocco 
Buttiglione, a devout Catholic and personal friend of the then-Pope, 
John Paul II, had been appointed as one of the new members of the 
European Commission. Shortly afterwards, he was rejected because 
of his staunch Catholic beliefs which he had publicly defended. 

Buttiglione was replaced by Franco Frattini, 
an intimate ally of Italian Prime Minister Sil- 
vio Berlusconi. As reported in The Times in 
London on November 1 0, 2004, upon his de- 
parture, "Buttiglione added a warning shot, 
saying that during Frattini's confirmation 
hearings: 'I hope ... that nobody asks him if 
he is a freemason/" 

Despite this open warning, Frattini became 
the deputy president of the European Com- 
mission with, ironically, responsibility for Jus- 
tice, Freedom and Security. In this capacity, 
between 2004 and 2008, Frattini personally 
oversaw the grafting of legislation that would 
curtail civil rights across Europe and essen- 
tially affect every sector of the lives of EU cit- 

Franco Frattini, Vice 
President of the Eu- 
ropean Commission 
for Justice, Freedom 
and Security, 2004- 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 

This episode, as innocent as it may seem, casts a revealing light on 
the moral values of the "Brussels EU". 

Masonic and Mafia infiltration in the "Brussels EU" 

Freemasonry has been a highly sensitive issue 
in Italy since 1 981 , when a secret and illegal 
right-wing Masonic lodge known as P2 - 
Propaganda Due - was broken up amid pub- 
lic scandal. Notably therefore, Silvio Berlus- 
coni, the current Prime Minister of Italy, was 
revealed to be amongst the almost one thou- 
sand names listed as its members - who in- 
cluded senior figures in banking, business, 
the intelligence services, journalism, the mil- 
itary and politics. Berlusconi, who in 2009 
was linked to a mafia bombing campaign by 
a mobster-turned-witness, is alleged to have 
joined P2 in 1978. 

Licio Gelli, former 
grandmaster of P2 
(Propaganda Due), 
an illegal right-wing 
Masonic lodge with 
links to Nazism. The 
members of P2 in- 
cluded the current 
Prime Minister of 
Italy, Silvio Berlus- 
coni. (Image credit: 

Historically, P2 is well known to have had 

links to Nazism and extreme right-wing 

groups. Licio Gelli, its former grandmaster, 

was jailed in 1998 for corruption and fraud 

in connection with the Banco Ambrosiano 

scandal and has been openly described by 

the New York Times as "a known Fascist/' The 

investigative writer David A. Yallop, in his book 'In God's Name: 

An Investigation into the Murder of Pope John Paul V , even alleges 

that Gelli was involved in a conspiracy that led to the murder of 

Pope John Paul I, who reigned for only 33 days, in 1 978. Even more 

disturbingly, some sources, including the New Zealand Herald and 

The Observer newspaper in the UK, allege links between P2 and 

state terrorism. Others meanwhile, such as the BBC, state it had 

connections with both the Mafia and right-wing terrorist groups. 


Chapter 4 

Speaking to the BBC in 2000, Paul van Buitenen, the whistleblower 
whose exposing of fraud and mismanagement in the European 
Commission under Jacques Santer brought about its resignation (see 
below), spoke openly of his fears of Mafia and Masonic infiltration 
in the "Brussels EU". 

Fraud in the European Commission and the punishment 
of whistleblowers 

In 1999, the entire European Commission, led by Jacques Santer, 
was forced to resign en masse after the publication of a whistle- 
blower report. One of the main targets of the report was French 
Commissioner Edith Cresson, who was accused of having commit- 
ted serious and repeated fraud; falsifying contracts; forging other 
people's handwriting and embezzling EU funds for her personal 
gain. During her time as a Commissioner, Cresson even went so far 
as to hire one of her close acquaintances, Rene Berthelot, a dental 
surgeon, as a highly paid EU adviser on HIV/Aids, despite the fact 
that he had no expertise in the subject whatsoever. Berthelot was 
later judged to be unqualified; he produced 24 pages of notes of 
little or no value in over two years of work for Cresson. In 2006, 
the European Court of Justice declared that Cresson had acted in 
breach of her obligations as a European commissioner. 

The allegations that eventually brought down the Commission were 
raised by the Dutch MEP Paul van Buitenen, who at the time 
worked as an auditor in the Commission's financial control unit. As 
punishment for his whistleblowing, EU officials disciplined him for 
violating procedural rules, reduced his salary by 50% for four 
months, and transferred him to a low-level job monitoring outlays 
for objects such as lightbulbs. 

But compared to some EU whistleblowers, van Buitenen got off 
lightly. In 2004, Marta Andreasen, the European Commission's for- 
mer chief accountant, was sacked for alleging that EU book-keeping 
was riddled with "slush funds and fraud". Despite the fact that her 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 

claim was clearly supported by the published reports of the EU au- 
ditors - who, by 2004, had refused to sign off the bloc's accounts 
for 1 years citing presumed attempts at fraud -the EU's civil service 
tribunal rejected her bid to have the dismissal annulled and upheld, 
in a 55-page judgment, every single complaint made against her by 
the Commission. 

Fraud in the European Parliament 

The Galvin Report, named after Robert Galvin, the EU Internal 
Audit official whose name is on its front cover, was written at the 
end of 2006 as an audit of the expenses and allowances claimed 
by a sample of more than 1 60 MEPs. Its findings included serious 
and repeated anomalies in payments for office assistance and serv- 
ices; dubious large cash payments made to staff and service 
providers over and above salaries; improper registration and tax 
compliance; lax or non-existent invoicing; and opaque or un- 
recorded expense claims. 

The existence of this shocking report was kept secret until February 
2008 when news of its existence was made public by a British MEP, 
Chris Davies. Even then, its contents remained secret and a select 
group of MEPs were only allowed to read the report individually in 
a locked and guarded room. After news of the report broke and they 
were accused of perpetrating a "massive" fraud, MEPs voted not to 
publish it and to keep their expenses scams secret. 

Corruption in the EU's "anti-crime agency" 

Even Eurojust, the EU's so-called "anti-crime agency", has been in- 
volved in corruption scandals. In December 2009, for example, the 
head of Eurojust, Jose da Mota, resigned after he was suspended for 
30 days for having put pressure on Portuguese prosecutors in order 
to stop a corruption probe involving Portuguese Prime Minister Jose 


Chapter 4 

Socrates. According to the UPI news agency, Socrates is accused of 
accepting kickbacks while serving as Portugal's minister of the en- 
vironment in return for approving a construction project on pro- 
tected lands. 

The Brussels EU Propaganda War 

Far from operating in a transparent manner towards its citizens, the 
Brussels EU runs a vast propaganda machine that is funded at tax- 
payers' expense. 

According to Maria Rankka, who runs the Swedish think-tank Tim- 
bro, for example, the unelected European Commission provides 
funding far in excess of its official €213 million communications 
budget to EU-sponsored radio stations and websites. The examples 
she cites include the European radio network 'Euranet' and the EU's 
YouTube Channel "EU Tube". 

Similarly, Rankka also alleges that broadcaster Euronews receives 
€1 0.8 million a year of Brussels EU funding, whilst the Brussels and 
Maastricht-based European Journalism Centre, which trains future 
reporters, is said to have been given a €1 million grant in 2008. 
Clearly therefore, when organizations such as these receive large 
amounts of funding from a political entity, serious questions have 
to be asked regarding their objectivity. 

But that is not all, for, according to Rankka, the Brussels EU also 
provides funding for organizations such as the Centre for European 
Policy Studies, the European Movement, the Europe for Citizens 
and Friends of Europe. Given how strongly pro-EU these organiza- 
tions are, it would seem reasonable to assume that such funding 
may simply be being allocated as a means of substantiating the 
claims of the Brussels EU that civil society supports its policies. 

Thus far, the Brussels EU propaganda efforts have mostly been di- 
rected towards citizens of voting age. In future, however, it seems 
likely that its attentions will be extended to include children. Citing 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 

supposed "lies" and "mistrust" being spread about the Brussels EU, 
for example, some members of the European Parliament are now 
calling for school pupils in all 27 member states to be forced to take 
European Union lessons. Without any doubt, however, the envis- 
aged curriculum - which would supposedly cover subjects such as 
the "Founding Fathers" and "How the EU affects everyday lives" - 
will not result in school pupils being taught the real facts, such as 
those to be found in this book. 

The deceptions of the Brussels EU in relation 
to human rights and fundamental freedoms 

The Brussels EU has put much effort into maintaining the illusion 
that it is protecting the human rights and fundamental freedoms of 
its citizens. Of all its deceptions in this area, its "Sakharov Prize for 
Freedom of Thought" is one of the classic examples. 

Set up in 1 988 "to honour individuals or organisations for their ef- 
forts on behalf of human rights and fundamental freedoms", the 
Sakharov Prize is awarded by the European Parliament each year 
at a formal sitting in Strasbourg. 

Whilst we would obviously not wish to in any way diminish the 
bravery and selfless efforts of some of the outstanding individuals 
who have won this award over the years, the fact is that it is deeply 
disingenuous for the Brussels EU to make such an award whilst it is 
simultaneously building a surveillance state that monitors citizens' 
private lives and erodes civil liberties; flouting a basic principle of 
democracy by preventing its citizens from being able to choose their 
representatives at the executive level of government; and taking steps 
to prevent citizens from availing themselves of scientifically proven, 
lifesaving natural therapies and information about them. 


Chapter 4 

The creation of a European surveillance state 

The Brussels EU is spending 
millions of pounds developing 
"Orwellian" computer tech- 
nologies designed to examine 
CCTV images and search the 
internet for "abnormal behav- 
iour". Under a five-year re- 
search programme, known as 
Project Indect, it intends to develop computer programmes to mon- 
itor and process information from 
web sites, discussion forums, file 
servers, peer-to-peer networks and 
even individual computers. This de- 
velopment is in addition to the fact 
that details of e-mails, website visits 
and phone calls are already stored 
by European internet service 
providers under EU law. 

The 'Brussels EU' is spending 
millions of euros developing 
"Orwellian" computer technolo- 
gies designed to examine CCTV 
images and search the internet 
for "abnormal behaviour". 

Similarly, the EU is also stepping up 
efforts to build a pan-European sur- 
veillance system and set up an EU ID 
card register. If these plans come to 
fruition, authoritarian satellite surveil- 
lance, automated exit-entry border 
systems operated by machines read- 
ing biometrics and risk profiling sys- 
tems will soon become the norm for 
all 500 million European citizens. 


The Nazi Roots of The 'Brussels EU' 

Worse still, decisions on the expansion of so-called "homeland se- 
curity" in the EU are seemingly being made by the very companies 
that will ultimately profit from them. According to the UK-based 
civil liberties monitoring group Statewatch, the design of the €1 .4 
billion European Security Research Programme (ERSP) has been 
"outsourced to the very corporations that have the most to gain from 
its implementation/' such as the defence companies Thales, Fin- 
meccanica, EADS, Saab and Sagem Defense Securite. 


Chapter 4 


Chapter 5 

the Brussels 
in Europe 


Enforcing the Brussels 
Dictatorship in Europe 

As we described in chapter 3, the Oil and Drug Cartel's design for 
the Brussels EU was closely based upon the blueprint published in 
1 941 by Arno Solter, the head of the official Nazi "Central Research 
Institute for National Economic Order and Greater Sphere Econ- 
omy." Perhaps not surprisingly, therefore, the basic strategies being 
used to enforce the Brussels EU dictatorship are directly descended 
from those used by the Nazis following the adoption of the Cartel's 
Enabling Act by the German Parliament in 1 933. 

The creation of a 
European surveillance state 

One of the Cartel's key goals in the 
1930s and 1940s was to turn Eu- 
rope into a totalitarian society, 
under which any and all opposi- 
tion to the Nazi regime could be 
eliminated. To achieve this, the 
Nazis had to engage in massive 
surveillance of the population. The 
agencies primarily charged with 
carrying out these activities in Ger- 
many were the Sicherheitsdienst 
(Security Service) and the Geheime 
Staatspolizei (Secret State Police, 
also known as the Gestapo). Be- 

Headquarters of the Nazi Secret State 
Police (the Gestapo) in Berlin. The 
basic strategies being used to enforce 
the modern-day Brussels EU dictator- 
ship are directly descended from 
those used by the Nazis following the 
adoption of the Cartel's Enabling Act 
by the German Parliament in 1933. 
(Image credit: Wikipedia). 

cause the wiretapping technologies 
available at that time were very limited, however, these agencies 
were very much dependent upon the activities of informants and 
the willingness of ordinary people to denounce one another. 


Enforcing the Brussels Dictatorship in Europe 

In the Brussels EU today, modern twenty-first century technologies 
have made the creation of a European surveillance state a vastly 
simpler proposition. Through the monitoring of citizens' commu- 
nications made by telephone, cell phone, email and internet, and 
the increasingly widespread use of high-tech surveillance devices, 
the Cartel's long-cherished goal of establishing a totalitarian society 
in Europe is now coming within sight. 

Storing the private communications of citizens 

The Data Retention Directive, passed in 2006, forces all 27 member 
states in the Brussels EU to ensure that telephone companies, in- 
ternet service providers and other communications companies store 
and retain all communications data for a minimum of no less than 
6 months and for up to 2 years. Under the legislation, communica- 
tions providers are required to store details of their customers' 
phone calls, text messages, emails and internet use and make them 
available to government authorities. 

As if this were not enough, it was announced in June 201 that over 
300 Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) were backing a 
plan for an even more massive data retention system that would 
force internet search engines to store details of web searches for up 
to two years for possible analysis by authorities. Whilst, at the time 
of writing, the adoption of 
the MEPs' "written decla- 
ration" for the plan had 
no immediate impact or 
force of law, it is a strong 
sign that, in its ongoing 
mission to turn Europe 
into a totalitarian society, In 2010, Italian MEPTiziano Motti (left) and Slova- 
the Brussels EU institu- kian MEP Anna Zaborska (right) managed to elicit 
tions will stop at nothing the support of over 300 Members of the European 
■ . i . Parliament for a proposal to force internet search 

short of the total violation engines to store details of web searches for up to 
of citizens' civil rights. two years for possible analysis by authorities. 



Storing citizens' confidential personal information 

In early 2010, it emerged that large amounts of confidential per- 
sonal information about European citizens are being held on a giant 
Europe-wide computer network that can be accessed by more than 
500,000 terminals. 

Known as the Schengen Informa- 
tion System (SIS), the system holds 
a wide variety of personal data 
that includes the names, dates and 
places of birth, nationalities, phys- 
ical characteristics and other de- 
tails of people placed under 
"discreet surveillance". Created 
following the implementation of 
the so-called Schengen Agreement 
- which, in 1 985, as a key step to- 
wards the creation of a European 
Superstate, abolished checks at 
the internal borders of most Brus- 
sels EU member states - the sys- 
tem consists of a national section 
in each of the participating coun- 
tries and a technical support func- 
tion in Strasbourg, France. 

Large amounts of confidential per- 
sonal information about European 
citizens are being held on a giant 
Europe-wide computer network that 
can be accessed by more than 
500,000 terminals. 

At the time of writing, an expanded SIS database, known as SIS2, is 
expected to become operational in early 2013 and increase the 
number of "alerts" held on the system from 31 million to 70 million. 
However, an official European Commission working document en- 
visages an even larger database and specifically states that the new 
system "should be tested with a view to ensuring a scalability up to 
100 million alerts." 


Enforcing the Brussels Dictatorship in Europe 

Mm: ' 


W "" 

Monitoring "abnormal behaviour" 

The Brussels EU is also spending millions 
of euros developing "Orwellian" com- 
puter technologies designed to exam- 
ine CCTV images and search the 
internet for "abnormal behaviour". 
Under a programme known as "Project 
Indect", it is developing computer soft- 
ware to monitor and process informa- 
tion from web sites, discussion forums, 
file servers, peer-to-peer networks and 
even individual computers. 

Open Europe, an independent pro- 
transparency think tank, believes the 
information gathered by Project Indect 
could be used by the European Joint 
Situation Centre (SitCen), a little- 
known body seen by many observers 
as effectively being the beginning of a 
Brussels EU secret service. Part of the 
so-called "European External Action Service" headed by Foreign Af- 
fairs Minister and Vice President of the EU Commission, Catherine 
Ashton - whose previous functions in the Brussels EU have included 
the enforcing of drug patents - SitCen is already known to contain 
a cell of secret service agents seconded from European capitals. 

Investigation and prosecution programmes are now multiplying so 
rapidly in the Brussels EU that, according to Stephen Booth, an 
Open Europe analyst, 1 7 law enforcement systems and databases 
currently operate or are being developed, of which 6 require the 
collection or storage of personal data at EU level. 

The 'Brussels EU' is spending 
millions of euros developing 
"Orwellian" computer tech- 
nologies designed to exam- 
ine CCTV images and search 
the internet for "abnormal 



Surveillance of people promoting "radical messages" 

In June 2010, documents emerged regarding a Brussels EU mass 
surveillance project designed to compile information on individuals 
and groups deemed to be promoting " radical messages." Obtained 
by Statewatch, a civil liberties body, the targets defined in the doc- 
uments include people involved in "anti-globalization" or "nation- 
alist" groups. 

The specific types of surveil- 
lance outlined in the docu- 
ments include the compiling 
of data on the targeted 
individuals' friends, family, 
neighbours, internet use, psy- 
chological traits, religion, 
socio-economic status, and 
even "oral comments" - pre- 
sumably obtained through 
phone tapping - they have 

made on political issues. 

The Brussels EU is compiling information 

on people it deems to be promoting "radi- 

Based upon the content of I cal messages." The people placed under 

these documents, it seems covert surveillance under this 'Big Brother' - 

reasonable to presume that st Y ]e P™'^ 1 include those involved in "anti- 

, , , .. i , globalization" or "nationalist" groups. 

anybody who actively and |_2_ 

openly opposes the takeover 

of Europe by corporate interests will henceforth be put under sur- 
veillance by the Brussels EU on the grounds they are promoting a 
radical message. 

Perhaps even more disturbingly, however, and as we shall examine 
next, in the coming years, the Brussels EU will seemingly even be 
recording the political orientations of European citizens who sign 


Enforcing the Brussels Dictatorship in Europe 

Monitoring the political beliefs of citizens 

The so-called "European Citizens' Initiative" (ECI), approved by the 
European Parliament in December 2010, is deceptively promoted 
by the Brussels EU as "a new form of public participation in Euro- 
pean Union policy shaping." 

1 ^^ ^ 


■ . 

I "'£< T^c? 

r w 

IB * ^^^^^ ^^^^1 

Brought in under the massively opposed 
and dictatorial Lisbon Treaty, the ECI at- 
tempts to portray the Brussels EU as a 
democracy that allows European citizens 
to call on the European Commission to 
bring forward political initiatives of inter- 
est to them. Behind the friendly-sound- 
ing political rhetoric, however, the reality 
is very different. 

Rather than allowing citizens' petitions 
to revise the dictatorial Brussels EU 
Treaties, the ECI only permits them to 
contain "proposals on matters where cit- 
izens consider that a legal act of the 
Union is required for the purpose of im- 
plementing the Treaties." In other words, 
citizens' proposals that oppose any as- 
pects of the Brussels EU Treaties or which go against "the values" of 
the Brussels EU - which, let's not forget, are actually determined by 
the Brussels EU itself - will not be accepted. 

But that is not all. In order for citizens' signatures to even be ac- 
cepted by the Brussels EU, the ECI sets highly bureaucratic and bur- 
densome rules for their collection. So much so, in fact, that 
European campaign groups are already stating that it will be ex- 
tremely difficult for petitions to be successfully completed under it. 

However, the most insidious aspect of the ECI is the insistence of the 
Brussels EU that all citizens' signatures have to be accompanied by 

The intention of the Brussels EU in 
setting up the so-called "European 
Citizens' Initiative" is to create a 
clandestine means of monitoring 
and recording the political beliefs 
of European citizens. 



- with slight variation depending upon the Member State they come 
from - their full names, their full home addresses, their dates and 
places of birth, their nationalities and their ID card numbers. As such, 
far from enabling "public participation in European Union policy 
shaping," as is claimed, it can be seen that the real intention of the 
Brussels EU in setting up the ECI is to create a clandestine means of 
monitoring and recording the political beliefs of European citizens. 

Monitoring conversations in European cities 

In a scenario closely resembling the type of world depicted in 
George Orwell's classic novel 1984, a covert surveillance system 
that uses hidden microphones to monitor the public's conversations 
is now being used in several European cities. The technology, called 

Sigard, is claimed to be able to an- 
ticipate "antisocial behaviour" by 
analysing the information picked 
up by its sensors. 

Privacy campaigners and civil lib- 
erties activists have pointed out 
that there is enormous potential 
for abuse with this type of surveil- 
lance in that, by treating literally 
every ordinary citizen as a poten- 
tial criminal, the system represents 
a massive step towards the cre- 
ation of a totalitarian police state. 

A covert surveillance system that uses 
hidden microphones to monitor the 
public's conversations is now being 
used in several European cities. In Am- 
sterdam, for example, 20 microphones 
are installed above the counters at the 
Central Railway Station. 


Significantly, therefore, Sound Intelligence, the Dutch company re- 
sponsible for producing the Sigard technology, has even suggested 
that police cars could be fitted with microphones and cruise city 
centres listening out for "signs of trouble." 

However, and as we shall see next, it is not only at ground level 
that the privacy of European citizens is being threatened. 


Enforcing the Brussels Dictatorship in Europe 

Recording the conversations of airline passengers 

In future, European citizens may 
even be covertly monitored whilst 
they are travelling on aircraft. In 
2010, it was announced that the 
Brussels EU is funding research at 
Reading University, in the UK, 
which aims to use a combination 
of cameras, microphones, com- 
puter systems and other devices to 
eavesdrop on the conversations of 
passengers and monitor their 
movements whilst flying. The 
funding of this work has quite rightly alarmed European civil liber- 
ties campaigners, who strongly oppose the ongoing development 
of the Brussels EU surveillance machine and its funding with tax- 
payers' money. 

The Brussels EU is funding research 
into electronic devices for eaves- 
dropping on the conversations of 
passengers in aircraft. 

Spies in the skies 

In line with its ultimate goal of turning Europe into a totalitarian 
society and putting its citizens under total surveillance, the Brussels 
EU has also been supporting research into the commercial devel- 
opment of Unmanned 
Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). 
Thus far, reports suggest 
that at least a dozen proj- 
ects relating to UAVs - or 
pilotless 'drone' planes - 
have been funded, with 
more likely to follow. 

Of particular note in this 
respect is a project on the 
development of UAVs for 


The Brussels EU has been supporting research 
into the commercial development of Un- 
manned Aerial Vehicles for the surveillance of 
urban areas. (Image credit: Wikipedia). 



the surveillance of urban areas. Known as the u Drones project, the 
places cited as being relevant to the concept include public places 
and airports. 

Some Brussels EU member states are already moving ahead with 
preparations for UAV surveillance of their populations. In the UK, for 
example, the Ministry of Defence and the Home Office have both 
developed extensive UAV deployment plans, with preparations being 
made for unmanned drones to be used to support police operations 
and monitor civilians. 

Proposals to fit "black boxes" in cars 

In a little known three-year study 
entitled "Project Veronica," the 
Brussels EU has been planning 
for cars to be fitted with aircraft- 
style black boxes. The boxes, 
also known as Event Data 
Recorders (EDR), could monitor 
variables such as speed, when 
and how often the brakes, indi- 
cators and horn were applied, 
and so on. 

To enable the Brussels EU to gain almost 
total awareness of the movements of Euro- 
pean citizens, it is planning for cars to be 
fitted with aircraft-style black boxes so that 
journeys and routes can be monitored. 

Whilst it is claimed by the sys- 
tem's supporters that the main 
purpose of these boxes would be to enable insurance companies 
and the police to ascertain the causes of car accidents, the reality 
is that, when combined with other tracking data, such as that from 
mobile phones and existing speed and traffic monitoring technolo- 
gies, the boxes would enable the Brussels EU to gain almost total 
awareness of the movements of European citizens. 

A final report on Project Veronica was published in late 2009 and 
recommended that the Brussels EU should introduce a Directive for 


Enforcing the Brussels Dictatorship in Europe 

crash data recorders to be implemented for various classes of Euro- 
pean vehicles and road users. Once these initial devices have been 
accepted by the public, however, plans to employ more highly in- 
trusive technologies - such as journey data recorders, which can 
collect data during driving for "monitoring" purposes - seem likely 
to move ahead. 

Biometric cataloguing and identification of citizens 

A revealing news release published in late 2009 by Giesecke & De- 
vrient, a technology provider headquartered in Munich, Germany, 
appears to suggest that the Brussels EU is moving towards imposing 
a system of biometric cataloguing and identification on its citizens. 
Outlining a European research venture known as "Project BioP@ss," 
which it describes as "the biggest chip card research project in the 
EU," the news release summarizes the project's goal as being "the 
introduction of an electronic ID card in chip card format valid 
throughout the entire EU." 

In addition to its function as 
also apparently intended to 

European citizens may eventually 
face the nightmare scenario of their 
DNA, fingerprints and personal de- 
tails being available at the click of 
a button to the Brussels EU. 

a basic ID card, however, the card is 
provide "a secure means of authenti- 
cation for services offered by govern- 
ments and public authorities, with 
BioP@ss-holders able to identify them- 
selves electronically and carry out bio- 
metric authentication on the Internet." 

Reading between the lines, the pro- 
ject's ultimate objective appears to be 
for European citizens to be required to 
use the card for everything from regis- 
tering a change of address, registering 
a vehicle, filing a tax return and cast- 
ing a vote in elections, to accessing 
services provided by the retail, bank- 
ing and insurance sectors. 



More worrying, however, is the possibility that European citizens 
may eventually face the nightmare scenario of their DNA, finger- 
prints and personal details being available at the click of a button 
to the Brussels EU. 

Worse still, decisions on the expansion of so-called "homeland se- 
curity" in the Brussels EU are seemingly being made by the very 
companies that will ultimately profit from them. According to the 
UK-based civil liberties monitoring group Statewatch, the design of 
the €1 .4 billion European Security Research Programme (ERSP) has 
been "outsourced to the very corporations that have the most to 
gain from its implementation," such as the defence companies 
Thales, Finmeccanica, EADS, Saab and Sagem Defense Securite. 


Enforcing the Brussels Dictatorship in Europe 


The Rule of the Brussels EU 

Chapter 6 


The Rule of the 
Brussels EU would 
End Centuries 
of Freedom and 
in Great Britain 


Chapter 6 

Eight Hundred Years after Magna Carta: 

The Rule of the Brussels EU would 
End Centuries of Freedom and 
Independence in Great Britain 

Here is a law which is above the King and which even he must not 
break. This reaffirmation of a supreme law and its expression in a 
general charter is the great work of Magna Carta; and this alone jus- 
tifies the respect in which men have held it. 

Winston Churchill, 1956 

Of all the proud histories of 
freedom and independence in 
Europe that totalitarian rule 
under the Brussels EU would 
bring to an end, the termination 
of the centuries-long history of 
liberty and self-government in 
Great Britain must surely rank 
as one of the most tragic. To the 
people of a country that has 
twice played a critical role in 
preventing the Chemical, Oil 
and Drug Cartel from conquer- 
ing the world, the delivering of 
Europe into the very hands that 
caused two world wars is an 
event that over a million of their 
brave ancestors gave their lives 
trying to prevent. 




-lIV^-V 4 -— *? c - 

-A i L- .-■ 

PMnur.. if.LV.>. 

■:■; :;.-■:-. 

j f i_,nVt 

■ ■ ■■£' JW," i.i A ■■ ■*> .it-S-*^*. r-f.S-^CTL £ ..^1 

England's Magna Carta, signed in 
June 1215, led the world in the de- 
velopment of constitutional law and 
is widely viewed as one of the most 
important legal documents in the 
history of democracy. 
(Image credit: Wikipedia) 


The Rule of the Brussels EU 

Looking further back in history, it is similarly noteworthy that Britain, 
through England, its largest member country, also gave the world 
the Magna Carta - a charter widely viewed as one of the most im- 
portant legal documents in the history of democracy. Signed at Run- 
nymede, in the English county of Surrey, in June 1215, this charter 
stood for centuries as a bulwark against tyranny in England. By rec- 
ognizing rights such as habeas corpus - the right of a detained per- 
son to a hearing before an independent court to determine whether 
the detention is lawful - and placing even sovereigns and magistrates 
within the rule of law, England's Magna Carta led the world in the 
development of constitutional law. 

Unbeknownst to many British people, however, the Brussels EU's 
so-called "European Arrest Warrant", passed in 2002, has repealed 
habeas corpus. Similarly, the Lisbon Treaty repeals not only Magna 
Carta's protections against arbitrary and capricious rule but also the 
very sovereignty of the British Parliament- a body that has been the 
model for parliamentary systems throughout the world. 

The British Parliament is widely acknowledged to have been the model for 
parliamentary systems throughout the world. Nevertheless, its sovereignty, 
along with the sovereignty of all of the other national parliaments in the 
Brussels EU, has been repealed under the Lisbon Treaty. 

(Image credit: Wikipedia) 


Chapter 6 

A proud history: Britain twice defends the world from the 
Oil and Drug Cartel 

Britain's entry into WWI took place on 4 August, 1914, when its then 
prime minister, Herbert Asquith, declared war on the German Empire 
in response to the invasion of Belgium by Germany. Amongst the 
many factors that were crucial in ensuring Germany's defeat in WWI, 
the key role of the British Royal Navy - the largest navy in the world 
at that time - is frequently overlooked. In fact, so important was the 
role of Britain's navy in WWI that without it there can be little doubt 
that the country would have been unable to stay in the war. 

Although fighting only one fleet action 
during WWI, at Jutland on 31 May, 1916, 
the British navy was successful in prevent- 
ing Germany's navy from escaping the 
confines of the North Sea. In so doing, it 
played a decisive role in enabling mar- 
itime trade between Britain and its allies 
to continue throughout the war. Along 
with the mass army it provided, Britain 
was also the arsenal and financier of the 
alliance and decisively withstood even 
Germany's declaring of unrestricted sub- 
marine warfare in February 1917 1 . As 
such, without Britain's efforts it is clear that 
the outcome of WWI would have been 
very different. 



i a? 

Sir Winston Churchill, 
Prime Minister of the 
United Kingdom 

Britain's entry into WWII took place on September 3, 1 939, when it 
declared war on Germany following the German invasion of Poland. 
Bravely refusing an armistice with Germany, Britain's role in defend- 
ing the world against the Cartel for a second time was no less crucial 
than it had been twenty-five years earlier. Under Winston Churchill, 
the British prime minister and arguably the most remarkable wartime 

1 Britain and World War One, 1 901 - 1 91 8; BBC History. 


The Rule of the Brussels EU 

leader in modern history, Britain stood firm against the Cartel-funded 
war effort and succeeded against almost unimaginable odds in forc- 
ing Hitler into a two-front war that was ultimately to become Ger- 
many's undoing. 

Nevertheless, the forces of the Cartel began regrouping and plotting 
in secret against Britain within only a few years of WWII having 

The Action Committee for the United States of Europe 
plot to lure Britain into the Brussels EU 

The history of the Ac- 
tion Committee for the 
United States of Europe 
has been largely hidden 
from the British people. 

A little-known committee whose history 
has been largely hidden from the British 
people, the Action Committee for the 
United States of Europe was founded by 
Jean Monnet on 13 October 1955 2 . Mon- 
net, a wheeler-dealer who was never 
elected to public office in a democratic 
election, had previously been the High 
Authority of the European Coal and Steel 
Community (ECSC), a post from which he 
had resigned a month earlier. The meet- 
ings of the Action Committee began in 
January 1 956 and were held in private. 

Right from the start, Monnet made it very 
clear what was intended. In a letter sent to 
the politicians and trade unionists who joined in forming the Com- 
mittee, he stated the following: 

Mere cooperation between governments will not suffice. It is indis- 
pensable for States to delegate certain of their powers to European 
federal institutions mandated by all the participating countries taken 
as a whole. At the same time the close association of Great Britain 
with these new achievements must be assured. 

2 Action Committee for the United States of Europe: Statements and Declarations 
1955-67. Pub. Chatham House, London, 1969. 


Chapter 6 

In short, the Committee's ultimate goal, as stated at its inception, was 
"to arrive by concrete achievements at the United States of Europe/' 

Subsequently, in a letter dated 28 Septem- 
ber 1968, Jean Monnet announced that 
the Committee had decided to invite the 
three main British political parties to join 
as full members. Moreover, he stated out- 
right that the political parties and trades 
unions which made up the Committee 
were "determined to pave the way for 
British entry into the European Commu- 
nity as soon as possible." 

Unknown to the British people, however, 
the longest serving member of the com- 
mittee's Executive Committee had been 
the German Kurt Georg Kiesinger, who sat 
on it between January 1956 and May 
1965. Kiesinger had been a member of the 
Nazi Party (his Nazi-Party NSDAP-Mem- 
bership number was 2633930) and he had 
worked in the Nazi Foreign Ministry's 
radio propaganda division during WWII 3 . 
He later became Chancellor of West Ger- 
many, a post he held from 1 966 to 1 969. 

jean Monnet, a 
wheeler-dealer who 
was never elected to 
public office in a demo- 
cratic election, founded 
the Action Committee 
for the United States of 
Europe in 1955. All 
three main British polit- 
ical parties became 
members of this com- 
mittee, which played a 
key role in luring Britain 
into the Brussels EU. 

Other notable members of the Committee had included the Italian 
Aldo Moro, its political secretary between May 1 959 and December 
1 962. Leading up to WWII, Moro had been a member of the Fascist 
University Organization (Gioventu Universitaria Fascista), a group 
sponsored by Mussolini's Fascist Party. Moro eventually became 
Prime Minister of Italy, a post he held twice, from 1 963 to 1 968, and 
from 1974 to 1976. 

New York Times, March 10, 1988. 


The Rule of the Brussels EU 

Astonishingly, however, despite the above 
facts, the leaders of all three British parties 
responded extremely positively to Mon- 
net's invitation. Prime minister Harold 
Wilson, for example, on behalf of the gov- 
erning Labour Party, wrote: 'The aims of 
the Action Committee are in close con- 
formity with those to which the Labour 
Party subscribes/' He added that he was 
pleased to accept the invitation for the 
Labour Party to join the Committee "as a 
full member." Wilson nominated three 
members of the party - George Brown, 
Walter Padley and Michael Stewart - to 
serve as its representatives. 

Anthony Barber, Chairman of the Conser- 
vative Party, replied in a similarly positive 
fashion, saying that after consultation with 
his colleagues he had great pleasure in ac- 
cepting the invitation and that his party 
would value its membership. Barber also 
nominated three members of his party - 
Mr Reginald Maudling, Deputy Leader of 
the Party; Sir Alec Douglas-Home, 
Spokesman on Foreign Affairs; and Mr Sel- 
wyn Lloyd, former Foreign Secretary and Chancellor of the Excheq- 
uer - to serve as its representatives. 

Jeremy Thorpe, leader of the Liberal Party, was equally enthusiastic, 
saying that he would join the Action Committee "with high hopes". 
He added that the sphere of cooperation must be "enlarged to in- 
clude diplomacy and defence and large parts of social and cultural 

The longest serving 
member of the Action 
Committee for the 
United States of Eu- 
rope's Executive Com- 
mittee was the German 
Kurt Georg Kiesinger. A 
former member of the 
Nazi Party, Kiesinger 
had worked in the Nazi 
Foreign Ministry's radio 
propaganda division 
during WWII. 
(Image credit: Wikipedia) 


Chapter 6 

As a result, the attendees at the Committee's 1 4 th Session, which took 
place on 11 March 1969, included members from all three major 
British political parties, all of whom sat not as private individuals 
but as nominated representatives of their parties. The meeting was 
held in London and was a key moment in the luring of Britain into 
the Brussels EU. 

Meetings of the Action Committee for the United States of Europe 
were held throughout the 1960s and only concluded after 1973 
when Britain had joined the European Economic Community. 

Decimalisation of the British currency - 
first step towards the scrapping of the pound 

To the designers of the Brussels EU, a key step in helping to ensure 
that its member countries were unable to leave the bloc was the cre- 
ation of a single European currency, the euro. The rationale behind 
this was simple: scrapping a nation's currency and making it subject 
to the control of a Cartel-controlled central bank reduces an au- 
tonomous country to a mere constituent state in a corporate-con- 
trolled superstate. 

Prior to the creation of the euro, the mon- 
etary systems of the six founding member 
countries of the Brussels EU had all 
utilised currencies based upon subunits of 
a hundred. As such, it was obviously de- 
cided that the pan-European single cur- 
rency would similarly utilise subunits of a 

Given however that Britain's currency, the 
pound sterling - the world's oldest cur- 
rency still in use - was based until 1971 
upon subunits of two hundred and forty, 

Britain's currency, the 
pound sterling - is the 
world's oldest currency 
still in use. 


The Rule of the Brussels EU 

harmonization with the decimal-based systems of the six founding 
member countries was deemed necessary before the British people 
could be coerced into ditching the pound and accepting a pan-Eu- 
ropean single currency based upon subunits of a hundred. 

Thus was born what eventually came to be known as the "Decimal- 
isation" of Britain's currency. 

The announcement that Britain was "to go decimal" was made on 
1 March, 1966, by the-then Chancellor of the Exchequer, James 
Callaghan, who described it as a "historic and momentous" decision. 
Although the real reasons behind the change were never fully dis- 
closed to the British people, Callaghan admitted publicly that "large 
sections" of industry, commerce, and banking had concluded it 
would benefit the economy 4 . Needless to say, Callaghan's precise 
reasoning as to why Britain's two hundred and forty subunit system 
of currency was somehow responsible for holding back the British 
economy was never made clear. Despite this, the new decimal cur- 
rency went ahead and was launched across the country on 1 5 Feb- 
ruary, 1971. 

Edward Heath - the man who delivered Britain 
to the Brussels EU 

Britain joined the EU in January 1 973 under its then prime minister 
Edward Heath, a man who had long harboured a desire to bind the 
country into a European federation. In his inaugural parliamentary 
speech, given on 26 June 1950 upon entering the British House of 
Commons, Heath openly called on the government to join the Schu- 
man Plan. Presented by the French foreign minister Robert Schuman 
only a month prior to Heath becoming a member of the British par- 
liament, the Schuman Plan ultimately led directly to the creation of 
the Brussels EU. 

Britain to go decimal in 1 971 . BBC News. 


Chapter 6 

Heath was well-connected with the elite 
of the Cartel, attending a meeting of the 
clandestine Bilderberg Group in 1976 6 
and addressing a meeting of the Rocke- 
feller-led Trilateral Commission in 1980 7 . 
Holding the post of British prime minister 
between 1970 and 1974, he was also a 
friend of the Glaxo drug company Chair- 
man and Chief Executive Sir Austin Bide 
- the man described by Britain's Inde- 
pendent newspaper as being "principally 
responsible for the transformation of 
Glaxo from a company best known for its 
baby foods into a world force in the phar- 
maceutical industry/' 8 Significantly, it is 
notable that Bide, while seconded to 
Glaxo during WWII, had worked on vita- 
mins and penicillin and was also respon- 
sible for patents. 9 

Edward Heath, British 
Prime Minister between 
1970 and 1974, was 
well-connected with 
the elite of the Cartel 
and delivered Britain 
into the hands of the 
Brussels EU in 1973. 

Another close friend of Heath was Eric Roll, later to become Baron 
Roll of Ipsden and a member of the British House of Lords. Roll was 
also a frequent Bilderberg meeting attendee and a member of the 
group's powerful steering committee. 10 

But Bide and Roll were by no means Heath's only controversial as- 
sociates. After French President Charles de Gaulle had vetoed 
Britain's entry into the Brussels EU during the 1960s, Heath invited 
the ex-Nazi lawyer Walter Hallstein, by then President of the Euro- 
pean Commission, to Chequers, his prime ministerial country resi- 
dence, to examine why the entry had failed. 11 This visit was one of 
several that Hallstein made to Chequers during Heath's tenure as 

5 D-Day delivers new UK currency. BBC News. 6 The Daily Collegian. September 9, 
1976. 7 1980 Trilateral Commission Plenary. 8 Sir Austin Bide: Industrialist who 
transformed Glaxo into a world force and then clashed with Thatcher at British Ley- 
land. The Independent; Saturday 24 May 2008. 9 Sir Austin Bide: After success at 
Glaxo, he failed to deliver at British Leyland. The Guardian. Thursday 5 June 2008. 


The Rule of the Brussels EU 

prime minister. Behind the scenes, during the decade leading up to 
Britain joining the EU in 1 973, Hallstein and Heath met on numer- 
ous occasions and worked closely together. 

Ex-Nazi lawyer Walter 
Hallstein met British 
Prime Minister Edward 
Heath on numerous oc- 
casions and worked 
closely with him. Hall- 
stein promised Heath to 
be at his side in pushing 
through Britain's mem- 
bership of the Brussels 

In recognition of their close working rela- 
tionship, Hallstein even contributed the 
foreword to the German edition of An- 
drew Roth's 1973 book, 'Edward Heath - 
Ein Mann fur Europa'. 12 From this, by his 
own account, it is clear Hallstein used 
Heath as his barometer for determining 
the political temperature before official 
meetings and negotiations on the UK's ap- 
plication to join the EU bloc. Promising to 
be at Heath's side in pushing through 
Britain's membership, it is equally clear 
that Hallstein was determined for the 
country to join the Brussels EU regardless 
of any opposition from the British people. 
Notably, therefore, Hallstein summed up 
Heath's role in delivering Britain into the 
arms of the Brussels EU by stating outright 
that: "The success of this battle was, to a 
decisive extent, his victory." 

Heath lost power in 1974 to Harold Wilson's Labour Party, whose 
election manifesto had committed it to allowing the British people 
a referendum on whether Britain should stay in the Common Market 
on renegotiated terms, or leave it entirely. 

In the campaign that preceded the referendum, which took place 
on 6 June, 1975, the millionaire businessman, Alastair McAlpine, 

10 British House of Lords, Register of Lords' Interests. 11 Heath and the Heathmen. 

Andrew Roth. Pub. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972. p169. 
12 Edward Heath - Ein Mann fur Europa. Andrew Roth. Translated by Heinrich- 

Gottwald. Pub. Bohlau-Verlag, Koln, 1973. 


Chapter 6 

who later became treasurer for Heath's Conservative party, acted as 
campaign treasurer for the 'Yes' side. Speaking to the Independent 
newspaper in June 2005, McAlpine admitted that "the banks and 
the big industrial companies put in very large sums of money" to 
the 'Yes' side. 

The Independent also described how, according to an organizer of 
the 'Yes' campaign, Caroline de Courcey Ireland, the 'Yes' side ad- 
ditionally had the benefit of money from the European Commission, 
whose funding was used to charter a series of 1 00-seater jet planes 
from British Caledonian airlines to fly almost 1,000 pro-European 
speakers to briefings given by top level Eurocrats. Reveal ingly, de 
Courcey Ireland described the money as "a sort of special dispen- 
sation" from the Commission. 13 

Faced with the referendum question, "Do you think the UK should 
stay in the European Community (Common Market)?", the 'Yes' side's 
massive corporate and European Commission funding ensured that 
just over 67% of voters voted in favour. After the vote, Heath admit- 
ted that he'd "worked for this for 25 years." 14 

To this day, the 1975 vote remains the only referendum the British 
people have ever had on Europe. 

13 How we were talked into joining Europe. The Independent. Saturday, 4 June 2005. 

14 UK embraces Europe in referendum. BBC News. 


The Rule of the Brussels EU 

Will the British people fight to maintain 
their freedom and independence? 

Through the passing of the Lisbon Treaty, almost everything that Go- 
ering - as head of the German Luftwaffe during WWII - had been 
trying to obtain for the Cartel is on the verge of being achieved. As 
such, the great loss of life and selfless sacrifice that took place in 
order to overcome the corporate greed that led to two World Wars 
will all have been in vain unless the British people are prepared to 
fight to maintain their freedom and independence. 

Clearly, therefore, although Britain has consistently been on the right 
side in global battles against the Oil and Drug Cartel, unless her 
people now fight back against the Brussels EU and its takeover of 
their country, everything that their fathers and grandfathers fought 
for in the past will have been lost. 


Chapter 6 


The Rule of the Brussels EU 



Chapter 7 

Who's Who 

in the 'Brussels EU 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU 

In this chapter, we document short biographical notes of selected 
persons mentioned in this book. The list is an arbitrary selection 
and the names are presented in alphabetical order. 

The selection of the persons presented was not made to imply any 
common affiliation to a specific organization or party. The common 
denominator of these people is that they have served, either in the 
past or at present, as economic and political stakeholders of the 
Chemical, Oil and Drug Cartel. 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Abs, Hermann josef 

(*1901 t1994) 

Hermann Josef Abs was one of the key 
figures of the German economy from the 
late 1 930s through to the 1 970s. 

From 1 940 onwards, Abs was a member of the supervisory 
board of IG Farben with a main focus on financial transactions. 

In his main job as a member of the board of directors of Ger- 
many's biggest bank "Deutsche Bank", his area of expertise was 
to ensure it the top spot in the occupied European countries. 

Abs was also a member of the supervisory board of many other 
companies that dealt with the German occupation of Eastern 

80% of all financial transactions made during the establishment 
of the Auschwitz factory complex built by IG Farben were han- 
dled by the Deutsche Bank and went through the hands of Abs. 

Abs was leader of the German delegation at the 1 953 "Agree- 
ment on German External Debts" that ended with relatively low 
payments for German post-war and WW 1 1 -debts, including all 
future demands made from victims' associations. 

Abs was directly involved in the expropriation of Jewish com- 
panies in Germany and in the occupied countries. 



After the war, Abs was briefly jailed, but quickly got back in busi- 
ness by making contacts with the British and American occupy- 
ing forces. 

Before resuming his old job at the Deutsche Bank, Abs was 
head of the "Kreditanstalt fur Wiederaufbau" (German recon- 
struction loan corporation) and financial advisor for Konrad 
Adenauer. He was thus actively involved in re-strengthening 
the German economy. 

In the 1960s, Abs was a member of the supervisory boards of 
30 companies - serving as a chairman of the board of 20 com- 
panies - an unmatched amount of power. 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Adenauer, Konrad 


Konrad Adenauer, Germany's first post- 
war Chancellor, used his powers to bring 
many fellow Nazi henchmen back into 

After losing his position as mayor of Cologne in 1 933, Adenauer 
contacted high-ranking Nazi-politicians in August 1934 and 
cited his services to the Nazi movement. He subsequently re- 
ceived payments from the Nazi government. 

In negotiations that took place with the occupational forces in 
1 949, Adenauer made efforts to prevent laboratories belonging 
to the drug company Bayer from being dismantled. 

During his 1 4-year long tenure, Adenauer strategically put Nazi 
criminals back into power in governmental positions. Others 
were helped to obtain release from jail and to regain their senior 
corporate positions. 

One of those Nazi criminals was Hans Globke, whom Adenauer 
employed as his National Security Advisor. 

Another example was Walter Hallstein, whom Adenauer 
helped to establish as the key architect of the structure of the 
"Brussels EU" and the first president of its so-called "European 



In 1956, Adenauer founded the German secret service "Bun- 
desnachrichtendienst" (BND).The head of the BND and a large 
number of its employees were recruited from former Nazi SS 
and Gestapo staff. 

Further information: GB5KA364 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Ambros, Otto 

(*1901 t1990) 

Otto Ambros was a member of the IG 
FARBEN executive committee between 
1938 and 1945. 

• Ambros oversaw the choice of loca- 
tion, planning, building and running of 
the "IG Auschwitz" factory / concentra- 
tion camp as an operations manager. 

• Between 1 940 and 1 945, Ambros was advisor to the head of the 
"Vier-jahresplan" (Four Year Plan) office, Carl Krauch, and head 
of its Department for "Research and Development" 

• Ambros was appointed as "Wehrwirtschafsfuhrer" (military in- 
dustry leader) with responsibility for chemical warfare agents. 
He personally advocated the use of the nerve agents Sarin and 
Tabun to Adolf Hitler. 

• Ambros developed the chemical weapons Sarin, in 1939, and 
Soman, in 1944, for IG Farben. 

• At the Nuremberg Tribunal against IG Farben, Ambros was held 
accountable for the crimes he committed during World War II. 
He was found guilty of "enslavement" and sentenced to eight 
years in prison. 

• In 1 952, he was released from prison without having served his 
full sentence. He subsequently became employed as an advisor 
to Konrad Adenauer and various drug companies 

Further information: GB50A882 



Augstein, Rudolf 


Rudolf Augstein, publisher of "Der 
Spiegel" news magazine, was one of the 
most important journalists in post-war 

Augstein used his influence to distract the public's attention 
away from the Nazi's responsibility for the fire that burned down 
the German parliament, the Reichstag, in 1933. The myth of the 
fire being started by Marinus van der Lubbe, who was alleged 
to be the sole culprit, was laid out in a series of articles in Der 

Augstein used the experience of former SS- and Gestapo-officials 
to set up a system of "investigative journalism", which aimed at 
influencing the politics of post-war Germany. 

Augstein's imprisonment in 1962, following the so-called 
"Spiegel Affair," was used as propaganda to enable him to be 
perceived by the public as "left-wing." Not unsurprisingly, there- 
fore, Der Spiegel subsequently became seen as a defender of 
press freedom. 

Augstein also selectively placed high-ranking Nazi officials in 
senior positions on his editorial staff: 

Wilfried van Oven, personal press officer for the Nazi-Min- 
ister for Propaganda, Josef Goebbels, became correspondent 
for South America - personally chosen by Augstein, who 
signed his press card. 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Paul Carell, former press officer for the WWII Minister for 
Foreign Affairs, Joachim von Ribbentrop, wrote regularly for 
Augstein's magazine 

Georg Wolff, a high ranking official in the Reich Main Se- 
curity Office, was hired for Der Spiegel in the early 1950s, 
eventually becoming deputy editor-in-chief in the 1960s. 

Horst Mahnke, another high ranking official in the Reich 
Main Security Office, was head of the foreign department 
of Der Spiegel. Mahnke later also wrote for Axel Springer. 

Karl-Friedrich Grosse, a high ranking official in Ribbentrop's 
ministry, became head of Der Spiegel's Berlin bureau. 

Erich Fischer, head of a department in Goebbel's ministry, be- 
came publishing manager in Der Spiegel's Dusseldorf bureau. 

Rudolf Diels, first head of the Gestapo, was hired to write a 
series of articles about his own secret police, which white- 
washed the roles of former colleagues that were active in 
post-war Germany. In 1933, Diels - then in charge of the 
Gestapo - was the main interrogator of Marinus van der 
Lubbe following the Reichstag fire. 

Further information: GB5RA733 



Bangemann, Martin 


Martin Bangemann, a German politician, 
was a member of the European Commis- 
sion between 1 989 and 1 999. 

• During his first term in the European 
Commission, between 1989 and 
1 995, Bangemann served as Commis- 
sioner for the Internal Market and Industrial Affairs. 

• As a Commissioner, Bangemann got into trouble in the 1990s 
when he took hefty payments for speaking engagements - de- 
spite this being outlawed for Commissioners. 

• Bangemann was also accused of abusing his authority after get- 
ting his Commission chauffeur to drive his Commission limou- 
sine to Southern France to meet him at his yacht. 

• Bangemann was EU Commissioner for Industrial Affairs, Infor- 
mation and Telecommunications Technologies during the 
Jacques Santer Commission. In 1 999, he was involved in a fraud 
scandal and was forced to resign along with the entire Santer 

• After the resignation of the Santer Commission, Bangemann was 
appointed to the Board of Directors of the Spanish telecommu- 
nications company Telefonica just weeks later. The EU filed a 
lawsuit in 1999 because of possible conflicts of interests. The 
lawsuit was later dropped after Bangemann agreed to not start 
working for Telefonica before 2001 . 

Further information: GB5MB824 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Bolkestein, Frits 


Frits Bolkestein was European Commis- 
sioner for Internal Market & Services be- 
tween 1999 and 2004. 

• In 1996, Bolkestein, who at the time 
was leader of the governing WD party in 
the Netherlands, tried to persuade the 
Dutch health minister Els Borst to have a cholesterol-lowering 
drug included in the reimbursement scheme operated by the 
Dutch health service. The drug, Cozaar, was marketed by Merck, 
Sharp & Dome, for whom Bolkestein was then a director. Ac- 
cording to the news program Netwerk, Bolkestein was also re- 
ported to have been urging Borst to reduce the reimbursement 
limit for Zocor, another Merck, Sharp & Dome drug. 

During his time as European Commissioner for Internal Market 
Services, Bolkestein drafted the "Directive on services in the in- 
ternal market". The so-called "Bolkestein Directive" was aimed 
at creating a single market for services, essentially in the spirit 
of the plans designed by Nazi lawyer Walter Hallstein. 

In 2001 , Bolkestein refused to take action after European MP's had 
asked the Commission to investigate accusations of undeclared 
accounts maintained at Clearstream, a division of the financial 
services provider, Deutsche Borse. Five years later, in 2006, EU- 
whistleblower Raul van Buitenen - who had previously exposed 
the Santer Commission scandal in 1 996 - alleged that Bolkestein 
was a member of the consultative council of the Russian "Bank 



"Bank Menatep" had previously been accused by Harlem Desir, 
a French MEP, of maintaining an unpublished secret account at 
Clearstream - thus potentially raising questions regarding 
Bolkestein's refusal to take action against Clearstream. 

Bolkestein worked for the petrochemical company Royal Dutch 
Shell from 1960 to 1975. 

Further information: GB5FB421 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Bosch, Carl 


Carl Bosch was chairman of the supervi- 
sory board of IG Farben from 1931 until 
his death. 

• In 1910, together with Fritz Haber, 
Bosch developed a process to produce 
ammonia in large quantities for use in 
the production of explosives. This opened up a highly profitable 
ammonia monopoly for Bosch's company, BASF, and later for 
IG Farben. 

In 1 91 8, Bosch was economic consultant for the German gov- 
ernment in the peace negotiations that followed World War I. 
Contrary to the initial intentions of the victorious powers to dis- 
mantle all chemical production facilities, Bosch reached a deal 
to save the factories. In exchange, the allied forces obtained se- 
cret knowledge of the dyestuffs industry and the Haber-Bosch 
process for the production of ammonia. 

After the formation of IG Farben in 1925, Bosch became chair- 
man of its board of directors. 

In 1 931 , after the death of Carl Duisberg, Bosch became chair- 
man of the Farben's supervisory board. He held this top position 
until his death in 1940. 

In 1937, Bosch was appointed as chairman of the Kaiser Wil- 
helm Society, the umbrella organization for the Kaiser Wilhelm 
Institutes and one of the spearheads of the unethical scientific 
research carried out during the Nazi era. The society was 
funded with public and private money. Private financiers in- 
cluded IG Farben and the Rockefeller Foundation. 

Further information: GB5CB992 



Daitz, Werner 


Werner Daitz was one of the leading ad- 
vocates of the Nazi "Greater Sphere" the- 
ory of a Europe under German control. 

• Werner Daitz studied technical 
chemistry and worked for 1 years as 
a director general for "Schon & Co.". 
The factory later became part of IG Farben 

In 1916, Daitz was the first to coin the term "European Eco- 
nomic Community." Forty years later, this term became used by 
his successors to describe the forerunner to the European Union. 

At around that time, Daitz started to publish articles and books 
on economic and social issues, with the main focus being a 
greater European economic market under the leadership of Nazi 

In 1 931 , Daitz became a member of the Reich management of 
Hitler's Nazi party, responsible for economic issues. 

After 1 933, Daitz was a member of the Reichstag for the Nazi 

In 1933, Daitz became head of the bureau for special issues 
and, later, of that for foreign trade in the Nazi party. The foreign 
trade bureau was one of the main Nazi ideological think-tanks 
and was headed by Arnold Rosenberg, one of Hitler's spin doc- 
tors on foreign issues. 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

In 1 939, Daitz founded the Society for European Economic 
Planning and Macroeconomics, which was funded by the Nazi 
party's foreign trade bureau. 

A direct branch of the Society for European Economic Planning 
and Macroeconomics was the Central Research Institute for Na- 
tional Economic Order and Greater Sphere Economy, which was 
headed by Arno Soelter. 

Further information: GB5WD198 



Davignon, Etienne 


Etienne Davignon is a former European 
Commissioner. Currently, he is Chairman 
of the Bilderberg Group and a member of 
the board of directors of the pharmaceu- 
tical company Gilead. 

Davignon was EU Commissioner for Industrial Markets, Customs 
Union and Industrial Affairs during the Jenkins Commission from 
1977 to 1981 and, from 1981 to 1985, was EU Commissioner 
for Industrial Affairs and Energy during the Thorn Commission. 

Davignon is a member of the Trilateral Commission. 

From 1 989 to 2001 Davignon was chairman of the Belgian com- 
pany Societe Generale de Belgique. 

Since 1990, Davignon has been a member of the board of di- 
rectors of of the pharmaceutical company Gilead Sciences - the 
same company that former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald 
Rumsfeld worked for as a member of the board of directors and 
chairman of the board. 

In 2005, Davignon became chairman of the secretive Bilderberg 
Group, the clandestine meetings of whom are held behind 
closed doors, away from the public eye, and attended on an in- 
vitation-only basis by the rich and powerful ultra elite from the 
worlds of the aristocracy, politics, business, banking and jour- 

Further information: GB5ED424 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Frattini, Franco 


Franco Frattini is the current Italian For- 
eign Minister and former European Com- 

• Appointed to the Commission in 2004, Frattini's selection was 
immediately mired in controversy amidst accusations that he 
was a Freemason. 

• In 2008, Frattini announced plans to fingerprint and screen all 
visitors who cross the EU's borders. The following year, it be- 
come mandatory for all new EU passports to include a digital 
fingerprint and photograph. From 201 1 , all non-EU citizens who 
apply for a EU visa will have to give their biometric details. 

• Associates of Frattini, such the Italian Prime Minister Silvio 
Berlusconi, have been accused of having links to Freemasonry 
and the Mafia. 

Further information: GB5FF666 



Globke, Hans 


Hans Globke worked on the Nazis' Holo- 
caust laws and was the "grey eminence" 
behind Konrad Adenauer, Germany's first 
postwar Chancellor. 

• Globke studied law and political sci- 
ences before joining the Prussian and, 
later, the German civil service. 

In 1 929, Globke became administrative councillor to the Pruss- 
ian Ministry of the Interior. 

After the Reichstag fire, Globke became involved in writing the 
Enabling Act and the Prussian Dissolution Act. He was subse- 
quently transferred to the German Ministry of the Interior. 

Globke gained a reputation as an expert on racial issues. He 
worked on the "Zweite Verordnung zur Durchfuhrung des 
Gesetzes uber die Anderung von Familiennamen und Vorna- 
men" (Second regulation to enforce the law on changing sur- 
names and first names). 

The laws and regulations that Globke worked on in the Ministry 
of the Interior played a substantial role in paving the way for the 
Nuremberg racial laws. 

In 1936, Globke co-wrote the commentary to the Nuremberg 
racial laws. 

During WWII, Globke played an essential role in transferring 
the Nazi Holocaust laws to the annexed European territories. 

In post-war Germany, Globke became the "grey eminence" be- 
hind the first West German Chancellor, Konrad Adenauer. In this 
role, he had immense power in the shaping of the new Germany 
and the working out of the plans for the "Brussels EU". 

Further information: GB5HG188 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Goring, Hermann 


Hermann Goring was one of the leading 
Nazi politicians and head of the IG Far- 
ben-led Four Year Plan. 

• Goring was the son of the first Reich 
commissioner of German South-West 
Africa (today: Namibia). 

In WWI, after initially fighting for the German ground forces, 
he joined the German air force. In 1 91 7, he became leader of 
an air force squadron and, in 1 91 8, was appointed commander 
of a fighter squadron. By the end of WWI, Goring held the rank 
of a captain. 

In 1922, while studying history and economics in Munich, 
Goring met Adolf Hitler in Munich. He was named first leader 
of the Sturmabteilung (SA). In 1928, he became a member of 
the German parliament for the Nazi party and, in his second 
term in the parliament, became its president. From this posi- 
tion, Goring played a crucial role in the destroying of German 
democracy and the establishing of the dictatorial Nazi regime. 

In 1933, Goring became Reich Minister for Aviation and was 
given responsibility for the reconstruction of the German air 
force. For his efforts in this respect, Hitler initially promoted 
him to the highest existing military rank - "Generalfeld- 
marschall" (General Field Marshal) - before eventually, in 1 940, 
creating a new, even higher, rank- "Reichsmarschall" (Marshal 
of the Empire) - and appointing Goring to it by decree. 

In 1936, Goring was named Commissioner Plenipotentiary of 
the Four Year Plan, with responsibility to prepare the German 



military for war within four years. Carl Krauch, who had lob- 
bied for such a position, was later given a key role in the plan. 
Subsequently, on the occasion of a birthday celebration, 
Goring thanked Hermann Schmitz - chairman of the board of 
directors of IG Farben - for giving him Krauch. 

In his role as head of the Four Year Plan, Goring was responsi- 
ble for the economic exploitation of the occupied areas. The 
fact that millions of people died of starvation was deemed 
"necessary" by Goring. 

In 1940, although Goring's Four Year Plan was extended, his 
influence in the Nazi regime was waning. Hitler grew dissat- 
isfied with Goring, who had become addicted to morphine. In 
1 942, the duties of the Four Year Plan were mostly taken over 
by Albert Speer's Ministry for Armaments. 

After the war had ended, Goring was a defendant in the 
Nuremberg Trial of the Major War Criminals. In 1 946, he was 
found guilty for participation in a common plan or conspiracy 
for the accomplishment of a crime against peace; planning, 
initiating and waging wars of aggression; war crimes; and 
crimes against humanity. He was sentenced to death by hang- 
ing, but committed suicide shortly before the execution. 

Further information: GB5HG322 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

zu Guttenberg, 


Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg is the cur- 
rent German Minister of Defense and a 
descendant of old German aristocracy. 

His ancestors include Joachim von Ribbentrop, the Minister 
of State during the Nazi era who was sentenced to death in the 
post-WWII Nuremberg Tribunals. 

Further information: GB5KG822 



Heath, Edward 

(*1 91 6 +2005) 

Edward Heath was British prime minister be- 
tween 1970 and 1974. Britain joined the "Brus- 
sels EU" in January 1973 under his premiership. 

• Heath had long harboured a desire to bind 
his country into a European federation. In his 
inaugural parliamentary speech, given on 26 
June 1 950 upon entering the British House of Commons, he openly called 
on the government to join the Schuman Plan. Presented by the French for- 
eign minister Robert Schuman only a month prior to Heath becoming a 
member of the British parliament, the Schuman Plan ultimately led directly 
to the creation of the Brussels EU. 

• Heath was well-connected with the elite of the Cartel, attending a meeting 
of the clandestine Bilderberg Group in 1976 and addressing a meeting of 
the Rockefeller-led Trilateral Commission in 1980. He was also a friend of 
the Glaxo drug company Chairman and Chief Executive Sir Austin Bide. 

• Another close friend of Heath was Eric Roll, later to become Baron Roll of 
Ipsden and a member of the British House of Lords. Roll was also a frequent 
Bilderberg meeting attendee and a member of the group's powerful steering 

• After French President Charles de Gaulle had vetoed Britain's entry into the 
Brussels EU during the 1 960s, Heath invited the ex-Nazi lawyer Walter Hall- 
stein, by then President of the European Commission, to Chequers, his prime 
ministerial country residence. This visit was one of several that Hallstein 
made to Chequers during Heath's tenure as prime minister. Behind the 
scenes, during the decade leading up to Britain joining the EU in 1 973, Hall- 
stein and Heath met on numerous occasions and worked closely together. 

• In his foreword to the German edition of Andrew Roth's 1973 book, 'Ed- 
ward Heath - Ein Mann fur Europa', Hallstein summed up Heath's role in 
delivering Britain into the arms of the Brussels EU by stating outright that: 
"The success of this battle was, to a decisive extent, his victory." 

Further information: GB5EH388 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

llgner, Max 


Max llgner was a member of the board 
of directors of IG Farben and, to all in- 
tents and purposes, the main connection 
between the Nazi government and IG 

llgner was born into the chemistry business; his father worked 
for BASF. After visiting the Prussian Officer Candidate School in 
Berlin, llgner studied chemistry, law, metallurgy and political 

In 1 924, llgner was head of procurement and an authorized sig- 
natory for Cassella, the first company to produce chemotherapy 

After Cassella merged into IG Farben, llgner became head of the 
central financial department in Berlin. 

In the following years, llgner established a system of manipulat- 
ing the Nazi government that became known as "System llgner". 
In the Berlin offices of IG Farben, the "Berlin NVV7" (department 
for political economics), led by llgner, was set up to deal with 
contacts to governmental representatives. 

The economics department in the llgner-led Berlin offices of IG 
Farben was used to spy for the Nazi government in foreign coun- 
tries. Its reports were widely used in government offices. 

llgner was an integral part of the so-called "F Circle" of industry 
leaders. The "F-Circle" met in llgner's bureau and advised Joseph 
Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda minister, on issues affecting the 
foreign propaganda of German industries. 



Max llgner was appointed as military industry leader in 1938. 

Part of llgner's responsibility in the Berlin offices of IG Farben 
was to develop strategies for the establishment of the European 
greater sphere economy. In this respect, he actively represented 
IG Farben in the Central European business forum - an interest 
group of German industry, banks and trade associations set up 
to conquer the Central European market - as a vice chairman. 

Prior to German army's the invasion of Poland, llgner presented 
the Nazi government with a wish list of factories to be appro- 
priated by IG Farben. This procedure was subsequently repeated 
before the Nazi occupation of each new country. 

llgner was arrested in 1945 by the U.S. military and sentenced 
to three years in jail for war crimes; crimes against humanity 
through the plundering and spoliation of occupied territories; 
and the seizure of plants. 

Further information: GB5MI444 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Kohl, Helmut 


Helmut Kohl is a former German Chancellor and 
full-time lobbyist of the pharmaceutical industry. 

• After World War II, the chemical and pharmaceu- 
tical industries systematically groomed politicians 
for the highest offices of government. One of those 
was Helmut Kohl. 

From 1 959 to 1 969, Kohl was a full-time lobbyist for the pharmaceutical industry 
at the "Verband der Chemischen Industrie" (association of the chemical industry) 

In 1969, Kohl became Minister-President of the German state Rhineland-Palati- 
nate, a state strongly influenced by the pharmaceutical industry. 

In 1982, Kohl seized the top job in the German federal government- Chancellor 
- through a so-called constructive vote of no confidence. The pharmaceutical 
cartel had given Kohl a leg-up from being an ordinary BASF member of staff to 
someone who occupied the central corridors of power. 

Kohl showed a special interest in European Unification. He was one of the main 
architects of the Treaty of Maastricht and of the Euro. The decision to make Frank- 
furt the head office of the European Central Bank was mainly due to his influence. 

For 1 6 years, Helmut Kohl promoted the pharmaceutical cartel's global political 
interests from the Chancellor's office of the Federal Republic of Germany. 

In 1995, while Kohl was Chancellor, it emerged that an arms dealer had given 
a series of undeclared contributions to Kohl's Christian Democratic party, the 
CDU.The scandal grew larger in November 1999, when public prosecutors in 
the German city of Augsburg issued an arrest warrant for a former treasurer of 
the CDU, who was charged with tax evasion for failing to declare a donation 
from an arms industry lobbyist. Investigators also found that the money was not 
a one-off payment and that the CDU had long been using a system of secret ac- 
counts to receive donations. Nevertheless, Kohl has repeatedly refused to name 
the donors and it still remains unclear how many millions his CDU party actually 
received in this way. 

Further information: GB5HK841 



Krauch, Carl 


Carl Krauch was chairman of the super- 
visory board of IG Farben. 

Carl Krauch studied chemistry and 
started to work for BASF in 1912. He 
became manager of BASF's ammonia 
factory in Merseburg in 1922. 

Krauch studied chemistry and began working for BASF in 1912. 
He became manager of BASF's ammonia factory in Merseburg 
in 1922. 

In 1929, Krauch became head of the new IG Farben branch 
"Hochdruck-Chemie" (high-pressure chemistry) and, in 1934, 
became a member of the board of directors of IG Farben. 

In addition to his job as head of Farben's high-pressure chemistry 
branch, Krauch also became head of the "Vermittlungsstelle 
Wehrmacht", the link between IG Farben and the German mil- 

In 1936, Krauch became head of the Department for Research 
and Development at the Four Year Plan office. The Four Year Plan 
was a government department created to get German ready for 
war within four years. Prior to the creation of the department, 
Krauch had actively lobbied for a department for war mobiliza- 

In 1 938, Krauch became a General Agent for Special Issues con- 
cerning Chemical Products at the Four Year Plan office. His spe- 
cial focus was the widespread use of IG Farben's poison gas in 
the upcoming war. 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

In 1 939, Krauch was promoted to president of the Department 
for Economic Expansion that was part of the Four Year Plan. 

In 1940, Krauch succeeded Carl Bosch as chairman of the su- 
pervisory board of IG Farben. In addition to his new job at Far- 
ben, however, Krauch remained active at the Four Year Plan 

In 1 948, Krauch was sentenced in Nuremberg to six years in jail 
for war crimes and crimes against humanity through participa- 
tion in the enslavement and deportation of slave labor. 

He was released in 1 950 and became a member of the supervi- 
sory board of Chemische Werke Huls AG, one of the companies 
formed after the break-up of IG Farben. 

Further information: GB5CK498 



Merkel, Angela 


Angela Merkel became German Chancel- 
lor in 2005 and has close connections to 
the chemical lobby. 

Merkel studied physics at the univer- 
sity of Leipzig in Eastern Germany 
from 1973 to 1978. Later, she was awarded a doctorate for a 
thesis on quantum chemistry. Between 1978 and 1990, Merkel 
worked and studied at the Central Institute for Physical Chem- 
istry at the Academy of Sciences in Eastern Berlin. 

After the reunification of Germany, Merkel was elected as Mem- 
ber of Parliament of the German Bundestag in 1 990. 

In 1991, Merkel became Minister for Women and Youth in 
Helmut Kohl's cabinet. From 1994 to 1998, Merkel served as 
Minister for Environment and Nuclear Safety. She had a close 
relationship with Kohl and became known as "Kohls Madchen" 
(Kohl's girl). In 2000, Merkel succeeded Kohl as the party chair 
of the CDU party. 

In 2005, Merkel became Chancellor in Germany. In a speech, 
shortly before being elected, she said: "The people of Germany 
have no right to democracy and a free market economy in the 
future!" It was obvious that Merkel had been briefed by repre- 
sentatives of the cartel. 

One of her close advisors is the chief executive of BASF, Jurgen 
Hambrecht. During WWII, BASF was one of the members of the 
IG Farben cartel. 

Further information: GB5AM988 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Oettinger, Gunther 


Gunther Oettinger became European 
Commissioner for Energy in 201 

• In 1 972, Oettinger began to study law 
and economics at the University of 
Tubingen. From 1984, he worked as a 
lawyer in Ditzingen. 

His political career started in 1983 when he took over as the 
chair of the "Junge Union", the youth organization of the reign- 
ing conservative party in his home state Baden-Wurttemberg. 

During his time as the chair of the Junge Union, Oettinger was 
co-founder of the "Andenpakt". The "Andenpakt" was an infor- 
mal group of politicians that included the Minister-Presidents 
Roland Koch (of the Hesse region) and Christian Wulff (Lower 
Saxony region), former ministers Matthias Wissmann and Franz- 
Josef Jung, the MEP Elmar Brok and the former President of the 
European Parliament, Hans-Gerd Pottering. 

In 2005, Oettinger became Minister-President of Baden-Wurt- 
temberg. While in office, Oettinger gave a eulogy in which he 
praised one of his predecessors, the Nazi lawyer Hans Filbinger. 
Instead of describing Filbinger as the Nazi criminal that he was, 
Oettinger attempted to portray him as an opponent of the Nazi 

Despite Oettinger's apparent attempt to revise the history of Fil- 
binger's Nazi past, Angela Merkel went on to nominate him as 
Germany's European Commissioner, leading to his becoming 
European Commissioner for Energy in 2010. Perhaps not sur- 
prisingly, however, Oettinger's lack of experience in European 
politics and global energy issues has led to his appointment 
being much criticized. 

Further information: GB5GT422 



Ophiils, Carl Friedrich 


Carl Friedrich Ophiils was a German 

Ophuls studied economics and law, before starting to work for 
the German Foreign Ministry in 1923. 

Between 1925 and 1931, Ophuls worked for the German em- 
bassy in London. 

After the Nazis seized power, Ophuls worked as a judge on 
patent law and as a district court director in Frankfurt, Germany. 

In 1 942, he received a teaching assignment from the University 
of Frankfurt. 

After the war, Ophuls became a legal advisor to the German 
government on European integration. Between 1955 and 1958, 
he was the German ambassador in Belgium. 

Further information: GB5C0266 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Ortoli, Fran<:ois-Xavier 


Frangois-Xavier Ortoli was President of 
the European Commission from 1973 to 
1977 and an EU Commissioner from 
1977 to 1984. 

Ortoli became French Minister of Economy and Finance in 
1 968. From 1 969 to 1 972, he was Minister of Industrial and Sci- 
entific Development. 

Ortoli became President of the EU Commission in 1973, serving 
until 1 977. In the following commission, under Roy Jenkins, he 
was EU Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs. 

In 1983, Ortoli attended the first meeting of the "European 
Round Table of Industrialists", an influential interest group com- 
prising, amongst others, high-ranking representatives from the 
chemical, petrochemical and pharmaceutical industries. The at- 
tendees at the meeting Ortoli attended included high-ranking 
representatives from the Shell petrochemical company, the 
Ciba-Geigy chemical/pharmaceutical company and the ICI 
chemical company. 

In 1 984, directly after his last term in the EU Commission, Ortoli 
was appointed as chairman of Total, the French petrochemical 

Further information: GB5F0552 



Reithinger, Anton 

(*1 898 - ? ) 

Anton Reithinger was head of IG Farben's 
politico-economic department in Berlin. 
His department was used to spy for the 
Nazi government in foreign countries and 
its reports were widely used 
in Nazi government offices. 

Anton Reithinger was head of IG Farben's "Volkswirtschaftliche 
Abteilung" (economic department, Vowi) in the Berlin offices 


Reithinger's Vowi was used to spy for the Nazi government in 
foreign countries. The reports made by Vowi were widely used 
in government offices and therefore presented plenty of room 
for manipulation. 

Further information: GB5AR877 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

von Ribbentrop, 


Joachim von Ribbentrop was German For- 
eign Minister between 1 938 and 1 945. A 
convicted war criminal, he was hanged in 
1 946 after the Nuremberg Trials. 

After fighting for Germany in World War I, during which he 
reached the rank of lieutenant, von Ribbentrop became a sales 
representative for a French wine and liqueurs company. In 1 920, 
he married Anna Elisabeth Henkell, daughter of Otto Henkell, 
the wealthy head of the champagne company Henkell & Co. 
During the 1920s, von Ribbentrops's import/export-company 
was one of the biggest in Germany. 

Von Ribbentrop met Adolf Hitler in the late 1920s and joined 
the Nazi party in 1932, subsequently arranging contacts be- 
tween the Nazis and other influential individuals. 

After Hitler gained power, Von Ribbentrop became the Nazi 
party's advisor on foreign politics. Later he became Reich Min- 
ister Ambassador-Plenipotentiary at Large, a post he held be- 
tween 1935 and 1936. After two years as German ambassador 
in London, he became German Foreign Minister in 1938. 

Von Ribbentrop was a driving force in the growing anti-British 
mood of Hitler and the German government. In 1 939, he played 
a key role in negotiating the German-Soviet non-aggression pact. 

After the successful occupation of France and other West Euro- 
pean countries, von Ribbentrop's Foreign Ministry became re- 
sponsible for Jews living in these regions. Von Ribbentrop was 



actively involved in the organized killing of Jews in those regions 
and, in 1943, received a present of 1 Million Reichsmark from 
Adolf Hitler for this. 

Von Ribbentrop was arrested in 1 945 and, at the Nuremberg Tri- 
als, found guilty of crimes against peace, deliberately planning 
a war of aggression, war crimes and crimes against humanity. 
He was sentenced to death and hanged in October 1 946. 

Further information: GB5JR411 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Sarkozy, Nicolas 


Nicolas Sarkozy is the current President 
of France, the office of which he assumed 
in 2007. 

Sarkozy studied private and business law at the University of 
Paris X Nanterre in France. He subsequently worked as a lawyer 
specializing in business and family law. One of his clients was 
Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister and media mogul. 

Sarkozy's political career started in 1982, when he became 
mayor of Neuilly-sur-Seine, one of the wealthiest communes of 
France. He stayed in office until 2002. 

In 2002, Sarkozy became French Minister of the Interior. While 
in office, he coerced the marriage between French pharmaceu- 
tical dwarf Sanofi and Swiss/German drug giant Aventis/ 
Hoechst. Between 2004 and 2005, Sarkozy was the French Min- 
ister of Finance after which, from 2005 to 2007, he again served 
as Minister of the Interior. 

In 2006, Sarkozy announced his plans to run for President of 
France. During his divisive election campaign, in an effort to 
scare mainstream France, Sarkozy widely criticized foreigners 
and immigrants. He even went so far as to call disenfranchised 
juveniles in Paris suburbs "scum," thereby deliberately heating 
up the political climate and presenting himself as the "law and 
order" candidate. 

Further information: GB5NS721 



Sdlter, Arno 

(*1911 t1987) 

Arno Solter was a strong advocate of the 
Nazi Greater Sphere Theory. 

Solter was head of the official Nazi "Central Research Institute 
for National Economic Order and Greater Sphere Economy". 

In 1941, Solter authored the influential book "The Greater 
Sphere Cartel" ("Das Groftraum-Kartell"), which outlined an 
economic plan for a Europe under German control. 

After World War II, Solter worked for the German "Bundesver- 
band der Industrie" (BDI), an industrial lobby group. 

Further information: GB5AS335 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Sutherland, Peter 


Peter Sutherland was a European Commis- 
sioner from 1 985 to 1 989 and has served on 
the boards of a number of multi-billion dollar 
multinational corporations, including the BP 
petrochemicals company. 

• Sutherland studied law at University Col- 
lege Dublin. In 1 982, he became Attorney General of Ireland. 

He joined the EU Commision in 1 985 as Commissioner for Competition 
Policy. In 1990, after his term ended, he joined the board of directors 
of the petrochemicals company BP. In 1997, he was appointed as chair- 
man of BP's board of directors. 

In 1992, while on the board of BP, Sutherland became chairman of a 
committee that reported to the EU Commission on the functioning of 
the EU's so-called 'Internal Market". 

In 1995 he became director-general of the World Trade Organization. 

In 2007, concurrent with his chairmanship of BP, Sutherland became 
an advisor on energy and climate change issues to EU Commission 
President Barroso. 

In addition to serving as chairman of the board of BP, Sutherland is also 
chairman of Goldman Sachs International. He was previously a non- 
executive director of the Royal Bank of Scotland and a member of the 
board of the multinational engineering corporation, ABB. 

Sutherland is a member of the powerful steering committee of the Bilder- 
berg Group. He is also European chairman of the Rockefeller-financed 
Trilateral Commission, whose membership comprises elite leaders from 
the worlds of business, the media, academia, politics and non-govern- 
mental organizations from Japan, Europe and North America. 

Further information: GB5PS961 



ter Meer, Fritz 


Fritz ter Meer was a member of the board 
of directors of IG Farben and a convicted 
war criminal. 

Ter Meer studied chemistry and law 

in France and Germany, after which 

he worked for his father's chemistry company, Dr. E. ter Meer & 

Cie. In 1925, the company merged into IG Farben. 

Ter Meer became a member of the board of directors of IG Farben 
in 1 925 and stayed on the board until 1 945. He also was a mem- 
ber of the working committee and the technical committee of IG 

Ter Meer served as a director of section II in the German Ministry 
of War. 

In 1 939, he convinced the head of the German Army Weapons 
Agency to use the IG Farben-produced poison gas, Tabun. 

From 1 941 onwards, ter Meer was responsible for the construc- 
tion and operation of the IG Farben factory at the Auschwitz con- 
centration camp. 

In 1 943, ter Meer became General Agent for Italy, the Reich Min- 
ister for armaments and war production. 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 

Ter Meer was arrested in 1 945 and faced trial at the Nuremberg 
Trial against IG Farben, where he was found guilty of war crimes 
and crimes against humanity through the plundering and spolia- 
tion of occupied territories; the seizure of plants; and participation 
in the enslavement and deportation of slave labor. He was sen- 
tenced to seven years in prison but was released early, in 1 950. 

In 1952, ter Meer became chairman of the supervisory board of 

During the Nuremberg trial against the IG Farben cartel, Fritz ter 
Meer's counsel specifically stated that the concept of a total Eu- 
ropean economic area shaped his client's aims. 

Further information: GB5FM677 



Wurster, Carl 


Carl Wurster worked for IG Farben and 
Degesch and was among those responsi- 
ble for the poison gas, Zyklon B. 

Wurster studied chemistry and began work for BASF in 1924. In 
1 925, he began working for the department of inorganic chem- 
istry at IG Farben. 

In 1 934, Wurster became head of the inorganic chemistry depart- 
ment at IG Farben. 

Wurster also served on the management board of the IG Far- 
benowned Degesch, the manufacturer of Zyklon B - the poison 
gas used in the gas chambers of Auschwitz. 

Wurster became a member of the board of directors of IG Farben 
in 1938. 

In 1952, Wurster became executive director of the re-formed 

Further information: GB5CW892 


Who's Who in the 'Brussels EU' 


Chapter 8 

Relay Of Life 

Chapter 8 

Relay Of Life 

In the previous chapters of this book, we shared with you our sober- 
ing analysis of the way in which the heirs of the architects of 
Auschwitz are making yet another attempt at world conquest. 

Recognizing the dimension of deception and fraud that would allow 
those interests to even have a chance at this latest attempt, it should 
teach a lesson to every reader: The only way in which the takeover 
of the world can be prevented - now and in future generations - is 
to immunize ourselves against the lies and deceptions that form the 
very basis of the modus operandi of these interests. 

More importantly, now that we have exposed the truth about the ar- 
chitects of Auschwitz, we consider it incumbent upon us to propose 
the way ahead. 

This book does nothing less than to rewrite the history of the twen- 
tieth century. 

It therefore follows that plans for the twenty first century have to be 
revised in order to take into account our new understanding of the 

The sobering analysis documented in this book now provides a 
unique opportunity to shape the future without repeating the mis- 
takes of the past. Considering the magnitude of these mistakes, the 
steps to be taken now will have to be courageous, far-reaching and 
global in nature. 

Moreover, the time to design the path to a better world is now. For 
if we do not draw accurate and immediate conclusions from the les- 
sons of history, mankind will lose an important opportunity for re- 
charting its course. 


Relay Of Life 

In this chapter, we will outline the actions necessary to create a 
world of health, peace and social justice. This world is no longer an 
illusion. It can and must be built now. 

How soon this world becomes a reality depends upon one single 
factor: How many of us are prepared to commit ourselves to reach- 
ing this goal. This call to action is particularly directed towards the 
younger generation, for it is their world and their future that is being 
decided now. 

Mankind stands at a crossroads. The alternatives could not be more 
distinct. On one side are the economic interests that are benefiting 
from disease, misery and the deaths of millions. On the other side 
are the people of the world, for whom there is no higher interest 
than the protection of their health and lives. 

The survivors of the Auschwitz concentration camps have recog- 
nized this defining moment in the history of mankind. With their 
call for a 'Relay of Life', as the few survivors left from the hell on 
earth of decades ago, they are passing on the moral obligation to all 
of mankind today. 

The 'Relay of Life' is not just a moral obligation but a call to action 
to protect life on earth in its broadest sense - and thereby creating 
the foundation for a better world. 


Chapter 8 

The Goals 

Mankind now has the opportunity to create a world of health, peace 
and social justice. But this new world will not come about by itself; 
we, the people, will be required to construct it ourselves. 

This book lays the foundation for one of the largest movements in 
the history of mankind: The "Movement of Life". The purpose of this 
movement is to liberate mankind from the shackles of a century- 
long dependency upon the Oil and Drug Cartel, and to protect 
human life for all future generations. 

For every movement, it is important to have clearly-defined goals. 
The goals for the "Movement of Life" are the following: 

• Spreading the truth 

It is now obvious that we, the people of the world, have been 
deceived with respect to such important questions as: Who was 
ultimately responsible for the largest crimes of the twentieth 
century - the sixty million deaths of World War Two? If the in- 
terests that have withheld this information from us for more than 
seven decades still control public opinion today, we have to 
ask ourselves further important questions: 

1 . Why did they lie to us? 

2. If they lied to us about such important matters as these, why 
should we believe anything they are telling us today? 

It is obvious that understanding and distributing the truth about 
history is the precondition for building a better world. 

• Protecting Health and Life 

The most important goal of the "Movement of Life" is the pro- 
tection of the health and lives of the citizens of this planet - 
now and in all future generations - from being abused by, or 
sacrificed to, corporate interests. 


Relay Of Life 

• Outlawing patents on health and life 

Mankind had to go through two world wars, with over one hun- 
dred million deaths, to realize that the root cause behind each 
of them was the principle of patents. Thus, the key goal has to 
be to outlaw patents on health and life. 

• Creation of a new healthcare system 

Over the past century, pharmaceutical interests have tried to 
build a monopoly on world health based on two main ele- 
ments: The exclusivity of patented drugs as therapies and the 
privatization of the healthcare sector under their control. It goes 
without saying that the precondition for a new healthcare sys- 
tem is the elimination of these two elements of control. 

As opposed to the existing healthcare system, which is based 
upon the promotion and expansion of diseases for patented 
drugs, the focus of the new healthcare system is the prevention 
and elimination of diseases. The first step in refocusing a new 
healthcare system towards these goals is the abolishing of all 
patents for therapeutic drugs and other medicines. 

The second step is bringing the healthcare sector under the con- 
trol of the people. This is the only way to guarantee that medical 
research, education and practice serves exclusively the health 
interests of the people and not the financial interests behind the 
pharmaceutical industry. 

• Protection of life 

The genome of humans as the blueprint and the biological basis 
of life belongs to us all. Efforts to own this genetic code, with 
the goal to re-build, sell and manipulate the human body or 
parts of it for corporate gain, should be prohibited. 

• Protection of the food supply 

The genetic information contained in animals, plants and the 
food that has been growing in our fields and gardens for mil- 
lennia belongs to us all. Manipulating and altering the genetic 


Chapter 8 

code of life, with the goal of patenting and creating global mar- 
ket monopolies, bears the danger that our food supplies are 
controlled and used for political gain by corporate interests. 

• Protection of the environment 

Good health and the sustaining of life depend upon clean air, 
pure water and an absence of toxic chemicals in the environ- 
ment. Over the past century, carbon-derived pollution of the 
atmosphere originating from oil drilling and coal mining indus- 
tries has become one of the major threats to our environment. 
Global warming and other consequences are also threatening 
the survival of our planet. In addition, conventional intensive 
agricultural techniques requiring the use of large quantities of 
toxic patented pesticides, herbicides and synthetic fertilizers 
have polluted our soil and water supplies, thereby threatening 
ecological balance and even life itself. 

In the twenty-first century, carbon-derived energies must be re- 
placed by hydrogen-based, solar, wind, tidal and other renew- 
able forms of energy, thereby simultaneously protecting human 
life and the environment. Similarly, intensive agricultural tech- 
niques must be replaced by organic farming and other decen- 
tralized natural agricultural methods. 

Protecting world peace 

The preservation of peace has been a dream for every genera- 
tion throughout history. While most wars were regional dis- 
putes, the twentieth century saw two wars that involved 
virtually the entire globe. 

The correct analysis of the causes of these two world wars is a 
precondition for the prevention of another global conflict. Since 
such a conflict will - no doubt - involve weapons of mass de- 
struction, this very analysis also determines the survival of 


Relay Of Life 

The facts documented in this book lead to only one conclusion: 
The termination of the principle of patentability in the sectors 
of health and life is the precondition for preserving world 

In a similar way, the termination of the dependency of the 
world's energy demand upon oil will take away the profit in- 
centive behind the military invasion of oil-rich regions. Conse- 
quently, the sooner the world's energy supply can be met by 
decentralized and renewable forms of energy, the less likely 
new wars will be to occur. 

Establishing social justice 

The colonial empires of earlier centuries that divided the world 
into rich and poor have been replaced by the world's leading 
export nations of chemical, pharmaceutical and petrochemical 
products. The global interests of the "Oil and Drug Cartel" not 
only cement the injustices on our planet but further expand 
them with every passing day. 

Of all these new modern forms of economic dependency, by 
far the most heinous form is that of "pharmaceutical colonial- 
ism." Behind the deceptive veils of charity and fighting epi- 
demics, toxic and deadly drugs that decimate the population 
and aggravate economic dependency are being promoted 
across the developing world. 

In a similar way, the divide between rich and poor nations is 
further aggravated by promoting patented genetically-modified 
seeds and foods to the developing world under the false pretext 
of fighting world hunger. 

The lessons from history are clear: As long as mankind allows 
the heirs of the Auschwitz architects to continue being the 
powerbrokers behind today's global economic order, there will 
be no social justice. 


Chapter 8 

The termination of the investment business with patented drugs 
and foods is a precondition for decreasing the gap between in- 
dustrialized and developing countries and establishing social 
justice on a world-wide scale. 

The modern decentralized technologies in the fields of health, 
nutrition, energy and others are the basis for economic growth 
in the developing world and for decreasing dependencies. 
Moreover, the termination of "tribute payments'' by developing 
nations to the Oil and Drug Cartel will liberate vast amounts of 
economic resources in those countries that can be directed to 
meet the basic needs of the people including food, health, ed- 
ucation and employment. 

We, the People, are the architects 
of this new world 

At this very moment in history, we, the people, have two alterna- 
tives: First, we can allow corporate interests to continue cementing 
and expanding their monopoly over this planet in key areas of our 
lives. Or, we, the people, take responsibility to build this new world 
for ourselves and all future generations. 

If we leave this world to corporate interests, they will continue their 
business with poverty, hunger, environmental pollution, disease and 
death. Of course, maintaining this world - and the economic ben- 
efits deriving from it - can only be accomplished under a global 
dictatorship that allows these corporate interests to curtail civil 
rights and disregard the will of the people. 

If we, as the people, decide to take responsibility, we can take ad- 
vantage of the most modern technologies, such as renewable ener- 


Relay Of Life 

gies and science-based natural health, and create a world of health, 
peace and social justice. The free exchange of information among 
the people, and the huge amount of economic resources suddenly 
becoming available, will enable mankind to take a quantum leap 
forward towards such a just world. 

The choice seems obvious. However, two aspects must be clear to 
everyone: First, we, the people, have to build this world ourselves 
because it is us and our children who will have the greatest benefits 
from it. Second, we have to do it now; for everyday that we wait to 
seize this opportunity, the status quo will attempt to cement its con- 
trol over this planet. 

The next steps 

Every reader of this book, every recipient of this documentation, 
who understands the urgency of now, should take immediate ac- 
tions to start building this better world. Following are some of the 
most urgent tasks that need to be undertaken: 

• Think for yourself! 

When you reflect on the contents of this book, and carry out 
your own research, you will realize to what extent you have 
been deceived and cheated from gaining a proper understand- 
ing of history, including your own past. In particular, you have 
to develop a critical attitude towards the media because it 
serves the status quo and thereby contributes to the global de- 

• Disseminate the information contained in this book. 

This book contains unique information, documentation and 
analysis that you will not find anywhere else. We have tried to 
substantiate as much as we can from official records, including 


Chapter 8 

material long hidden in governmental and international 
archives. We encourage you to study all of the links in the on- 
line version of this book and to conduct your own research. We 
encourage you to forward the online version of this book to 
everyone you know and to include a personal comment regard- 
ing what you have learned. 

Contact your political representatives. 

Do not assume that your political representatives are aware of 
the facts contained in this book. While some of them have been 
brought to power by these interests, many others have simply 
been victimized - as, indeed, all of us have been. Those in the 
latter group deserve a chance to prove that they really represent 
your interests. 

Send a copy of this book to your political representatives. 

Ask your politicians whether they are aware of the historical 
facts contained in this book. Their answers may surprise you. 

Organize to spread the message of this book. 

The best way we can make sure this book reaches the farthest 
corners of your village, town, city or country is by forming a 
group with other readers who share your determination to act. 
The first task of such a group, of course, is to develop ways to 
distribute this book in your community and to make sure that 
literally everybody reads it. As a result of carrying out this task, 
many other activities can be developed. 


Relay Of Life 

Seek out and work with like-minded people. 

There are many possibilities and many areas where you can be- 
come active and involved in campaigning. They include: 

Protection of the environment 

Alternative energy 

Science-based natural health 

Organic gardening 

Micro financing and alternative economies 

Any other areas whereby the hold that corporate interests 

have over our planet can be reduced 

Vote with your pocket. 

Be as careful in choosing where and upon what you spend your 
money on as you are in choosing which politicians to vote for. 
Where and upon what you spend your money on really does 
change the world. For example: 

By buying organic produce you are casting a vote against 
the chemical industry's business with pesticides. 
By buying an energy efficient car you are casting a vote 
against the petrochemicals industry and pollution. 
By choosing science-based natural health for yourself and 
your family, you are casting a vote against the pharmaceu- 
tical business with disease and its monopoly on health. 


Chapter 8 

Platform for a Better World 

The documentation and analysis contained in this book forms the 
launching pad upon which mankind can build a better world. 

Already, two years ago, more than two dozen survivors of these 
concentration camps gathered in the city of Auschwitz to present a 
new constitution to the governments of Europe. This constitution 
"For the People, by the People", outlined the necessity to safeguard 
the interests of the people against corporate greed. 

Unfortunately, this historic call - presented as a "Relay of Life" by 
a group of people with the highest moral authority on this planet - 
was ignored by the political leaders of Europe. To the contrary, by 
signing the Lisbon "Enabling Act", these short-sighted politicians 
gave the green light to a process that would hand over the entire 
European continent to the very same corporate interests that have 
already been responsible for two world wars. 

In this situation, we, the authors of this book, have decided to in- 
clude this call in this book and spread it as a political platform and 
precondition to preserve democracy for this and future generations. 
On the following pages, we document the historic call for a "Relay 
of Life" towards the building of a Europe - and ultimately a World 
- for the People and by the People. As opposed to many national 
and regional political platforms, this international call can be car- 
ried by an overwhelming support from the people of the world be- 
cause it carries unprecedented credibility and authority: The moral 
weight of the survivors of the worst crimes committed against 
mankind combined with the correct analysis of the causes of two 
world wars. 


Relay Of Life 




We, survivors of the Holocaust - labeled as slaves by the numbers 

branded on us in the German Nazi concentration camps - 

feel that time is passing quickly The world has become 

increasingly resistant to our testimony about hunger and 

misery, about annihilating slave labor, about war and hatred, 

and other Nazi crimes. 

We have lived to see the growing realization of a wonderful idea 
of a new Europe. This Europe was to be built on the memory of 
the past, as a fundamental principle of a Europe for the people, 

by the people. 

However, what we are observing, are more and more violations 

of this principle. In the history of Europe, the basic human rights 

to health and life were the rights most frequently violated. 

In the last century alone, two world wars cost the lives of over 

1 00 million people. In the cycle of events shaping the picture 

of Europe, one place stood out as the symbol of agony and 

death: German Nazi concentration and extermination camp 


Hundreds of thousands of men and women from across Europe 

imprisoned in concentration camps lost their lives as slave 

laborers in the name of corporate greed. 


Chapter 8 

Even more, tens of thousands of them lost their lives in pseudo- 
medical experiments conducted on prisoners in order to obtain 
patents for various drugs on behalf of different pharmaceutical 
companies within IG Farben. 

Today, the building of a New Europe occurs at a time when 

we, the "witnesses of time", are still giving our testimony as to 

the consequences of the disregard for human lives and the needs 

of people. 

Our lives were shaped at the time when human life did not 

have any value and the slave was needed only for his labor. 

The absolute owners of a human being were not so much SS-men 

but the robots of money and power from IG Farben Auschwitz. 

This is why we feel responsible for the process of building a new 
Europe for the people and by the people. 

This is not an issue of political opinion. 

This is our call for remembrance. 

This is our call for life, 

For rational thinking, 

For a Europe for the people and by the people, 

For a relay of remembrance, 

For a relay of life. 

We should never allow this relay to be discontinued even if, from 
behind the curtains of a new Europe, strange masques appear re- 
sembling the faces of IG Farben Auschwitz. 


Relay Of Life 


The most fundamental human rights are the rights to health 

and life. These rights are not only threatened by military conflicts, 

but also by corporate interests and their increasing attempts to 

exploit the human body and knowledge of it as their exclusive 

property and source of profits. 




Our health and our bodies are the most valuable goods we have. 

They must not be exploited as a marketplace for patented drugs 

or any other form of commercialization. The expansion of 

diseases as markets for drugs is unconstitutional. 

Any healthcare system based on these principles and promoting 

them should be outlawed. 


The genome of humans as the blueprint of life and the biological 

basis of our existence, belongs to all mankind. Efforts to own this 

genetic code with the goal to re-build, sell and manipulate the 

human body or parts of it for corporate gain is unconstitutional 

and therefore prohibited. 


The genetic information of all plants and the food that has been 

growing in our fields and gardens for millennia belongs to all 

mankind. Manipulation and alteration of the genetic code of 

plants with the goal of patenting them and creating global market 

monopolies bears the danger that our food supplies are 

controlled by corporate interests. As with health and life, the 

monopolization of food leads to the control of entire societies. 


Chapter 8 


The reason why these fundamental human rights are not yet 
universally accepted and applied is the principle of patenting. 

Patents are the economic instrument of inflating returns on 

investments for entire industries including those industries that 

directly affect human health and life. 


In order to enforce this principle and protect the health and 
lives of this and future generations of Europeans, patents in the 
fields of health, life and food are declared unconstitutional. We 
call upon the CITIZENS of Europe who will read this proposed 


it with their signatures. 


This proposed constitution serves as a blueprint defining funda- 
mental human rights across Europe, including the right to healthy 
environment, respect for human dignity and protection of social 
values. We are passing this call to the citizens of Europe. They 
have been the true guardians of remembrance preserving the his- 
toric memory across generations and will continue the relay of re- 
membrance and relay of life. 


Relay Of Life 

This document, of course, is not just another impassioned call for 
a better world. The distinct analysis and the concise principles out- 
lined in the document predestine it to be the cornerstone of a world 
that is achievable within most of our lifetimes. 

• Becoming part of the Relay of Life 

If you, as a person or an organization, want to play a more ac- 
tive role in the 'Relay of Life' movement, please contact us. 

We are interested in building up a network of people and or- 
ganizations committed to disseminating the historical truth and 
ending decades of global deception. The information contained 
in this book and the related references constitute our road map. 

You can contact us via email at: